Role of imaging modalities in assessment of gynecological causes of pelvic pain

Eman Alhalawany, Magda Yakut, Nahed Abd-Allatif
{"title":"Role of imaging modalities in assessment of gynecological causes of pelvic pain","authors":"Eman Alhalawany, Magda Yakut, Nahed Abd-Allatif","doi":"10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_168_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Pelvic pain is common in females present to the OB/GYN Department. Ultrasonography (US) is the first imaging modality for assessment of pelvic pain of gynecological causes, sometimes followed by computed tomography (CT) or MRI to reach diagnosis. Objective The objective was to evaluate the role of imaging modalities in assessment of gynecologic causes of pelvic pain. Patients and methods The current study included 50 cases presented to the Radiology Department in Al Azhar University Hospital complaining of pelvic pain. All patients were subjected to history taking and clinical examination. Laboratory investigations, such as B-HCG or CA125, were included for selected cases. All patients underwent US (transabdominal or transvaginal) as a primary imaging modality, then CT, or MRI when indicated. Results Patients were divided into two groups: 33 (66%) patients with acute pelvic pain and 17 (34%) patients with chronic pelvic pain. Patients with acute pelvic pain were distributed according to diagnosis into seven (21.5%) simple ovarian cysts, five (15.5%) ectopic pregnancies, four (12%)hemorrhagic cysts, three (9%) dermoids, three (9%) pelvic inflammatory disease, two (6%) endometriomas, two (6%) adenomyosis, two (6%) missed abortions, one (3%) hematocolpos, one (3%)ovarian apoplexy, one (3%) perforated intrauterine device, one (3%) ovarian mass, and one (3%) partial vesicular mole. Patients with chronic pelvic pain were distributed according to diagnosis into six (35%) leiomyomas, four (23%) ovarian masses, two (2%) dermoids, two (2%) endometriomas, one (6%) adenomyosis, one (6%) cervical cancer, and one (6%) pelvic lipomatosis. Conclusion US is the reliable imaging modality for assessment of pelvic pain of gynecological causes. CT was performed if US is inconclusive, nondiagnostic, and if abnormality was beyond the field of view. MRI was superior to CT.","PeriodicalId":22975,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls","volume":"135 1","pages":"806 - 812"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_168_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Pelvic pain is common in females present to the OB/GYN Department. Ultrasonography (US) is the first imaging modality for assessment of pelvic pain of gynecological causes, sometimes followed by computed tomography (CT) or MRI to reach diagnosis. Objective The objective was to evaluate the role of imaging modalities in assessment of gynecologic causes of pelvic pain. Patients and methods The current study included 50 cases presented to the Radiology Department in Al Azhar University Hospital complaining of pelvic pain. All patients were subjected to history taking and clinical examination. Laboratory investigations, such as B-HCG or CA125, were included for selected cases. All patients underwent US (transabdominal or transvaginal) as a primary imaging modality, then CT, or MRI when indicated. Results Patients were divided into two groups: 33 (66%) patients with acute pelvic pain and 17 (34%) patients with chronic pelvic pain. Patients with acute pelvic pain were distributed according to diagnosis into seven (21.5%) simple ovarian cysts, five (15.5%) ectopic pregnancies, four (12%)hemorrhagic cysts, three (9%) dermoids, three (9%) pelvic inflammatory disease, two (6%) endometriomas, two (6%) adenomyosis, two (6%) missed abortions, one (3%) hematocolpos, one (3%)ovarian apoplexy, one (3%) perforated intrauterine device, one (3%) ovarian mass, and one (3%) partial vesicular mole. Patients with chronic pelvic pain were distributed according to diagnosis into six (35%) leiomyomas, four (23%) ovarian masses, two (2%) dermoids, two (2%) endometriomas, one (6%) adenomyosis, one (6%) cervical cancer, and one (6%) pelvic lipomatosis. Conclusion US is the reliable imaging modality for assessment of pelvic pain of gynecological causes. CT was performed if US is inconclusive, nondiagnostic, and if abnormality was beyond the field of view. MRI was superior to CT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影像学在评估骨盆疼痛的妇科原因中的作用
背景盆腔疼痛在妇产科就诊的女性中很常见。超声检查(US)是评估妇科原因盆腔疼痛的首选成像方式,有时其次是计算机断层扫描(CT)或MRI以达到诊断。目的探讨影像学在妇科盆腔疼痛诊断中的作用。患者和方法目前的研究包括50例到爱资哈尔大学医院放射科主诉骨盆疼痛的病例。所有患者均接受病史和临床检查。选定病例纳入实验室调查,如B-HCG或CA125。所有患者均行US(经腹或经阴道)作为主要影像学检查方式,然后行CT或MRI。结果患者分为急性盆腔疼痛组33例(66%),慢性盆腔疼痛组17例(34%)。急性盆腔疼痛患者根据诊断分布为单纯性卵巢囊肿7例(21.5%)、异位妊娠5例(15.5%)、出血性囊肿4例(12%)、皮样病变3例(9%)、盆腔炎3例(9%)、子宫内膜异位瘤2例(6%)、子宫腺肌病2例(6%)、漏产2例(6%)、结肠积血1例(3%)、卵巢中风1例(3%)、宫内节育器穿孔1例(3%)、卵巢肿块1例(3%)、部分水疱性痣1例(3%)。慢性盆腔疼痛患者根据诊断分为6例(35%)平滑肌瘤、4例(23%)卵巢肿块、2例(2%)皮样瘤、2例(2%)子宫内膜异位瘤、1例(6%)子宫腺肌病、1例(6%)宫颈癌和1例(6%)盆腔脂肪瘤。结论超声是评价妇科原因引起的盆腔疼痛的可靠影像学方式。如果超声不确定,不能诊断,并且异常超出了视野,则行CT检查。MRI优于CT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of nanofat injection in postburn and post-traumatic facial scars Immunological markers changes in pediatric immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura Minimally invasive strabismus surgery versus paralimbal approach for horizontal strabismus surgery Clinical applications of brain diffusion-tensor imaging and fiber tractography Choroidal and retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses in smokers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1