Determinants of working poverty in Indonesia

Faharuddin Faharuddin, Darma Endrawati
{"title":"Determinants of working poverty in Indonesia","authors":"Faharuddin Faharuddin, Darma Endrawati","doi":"10.1108/jed-09-2021-0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe study’s first aim is to estimate the scale of working poverty using a nationwide household survey. The second aim is to answer the following research questions: is working enough to escape poverty, and what are the determinants of working poverty?Design/methodology/approachThe focus is on working people in Indonesia who have per capita household expenditure below the provincial poverty line. The determinant analysis used logistic regression on the first quarter of 2013 Susenas microdata.FindingsThe study found that the scale of the working poverty problem is equivalent to the scale of the poverty, although the in-work poverty rate is lower than the poverty rate in all provinces. The logistic regression results conclude that the three factors, namely individual-level, employment-related and household-level variables, have significant contributions to the incidence of the working poor in Indonesia.Practical implicationsSome practical implications for reducing the incidence of working poverty are increasing labor earnings through productivity growth and improving workers' skills, encouraging the labor participation of the poor and reducing precarious work. This study also suggests the need to continue assisting the working poor, particularly by increasing access to financial credit.Originality/valueResearch aimed at studying working poverty in Indonesia in the peer-reviewed literature is rare until now based on the authors' search. This study will fill the gap and provoke further research on working poverty in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":34568,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics and Development","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jed-09-2021-0151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

PurposeThe study’s first aim is to estimate the scale of working poverty using a nationwide household survey. The second aim is to answer the following research questions: is working enough to escape poverty, and what are the determinants of working poverty?Design/methodology/approachThe focus is on working people in Indonesia who have per capita household expenditure below the provincial poverty line. The determinant analysis used logistic regression on the first quarter of 2013 Susenas microdata.FindingsThe study found that the scale of the working poverty problem is equivalent to the scale of the poverty, although the in-work poverty rate is lower than the poverty rate in all provinces. The logistic regression results conclude that the three factors, namely individual-level, employment-related and household-level variables, have significant contributions to the incidence of the working poor in Indonesia.Practical implicationsSome practical implications for reducing the incidence of working poverty are increasing labor earnings through productivity growth and improving workers' skills, encouraging the labor participation of the poor and reducing precarious work. This study also suggests the need to continue assisting the working poor, particularly by increasing access to financial credit.Originality/valueResearch aimed at studying working poverty in Indonesia in the peer-reviewed literature is rare until now based on the authors' search. This study will fill the gap and provoke further research on working poverty in Indonesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚工作贫困的决定因素
该研究的第一个目的是通过全国家庭调查来估计工作贫困的规模。第二个目标是回答以下研究问题:工作是否足以摆脱贫困,以及工作贫困的决定因素是什么?设计/方法/方法重点是印度尼西亚的劳动人民,他们的人均家庭支出低于省贫困线。决定因素分析采用logistic回归对2013年第一季度的Susenas微数据。研究发现,尽管在职贫困率低于各省的贫困率,但在职贫困问题的规模与贫困的规模相当。逻辑回归结果表明,三个因素,即个人层面、就业相关和家庭层面的变量,对印度尼西亚的工作贫困发生率有重大贡献。减少工作贫困发生率的一些实际影响是通过提高生产率和提高工人技能来增加劳动收入,鼓励穷人参与劳动,减少不稳定的工作。这项研究还表明,有必要继续帮助有工作的穷人,特别是通过增加获得金融信贷的机会。原创性/价值根据作者的搜索,在同行评议的文献中,旨在研究印度尼西亚工作贫困的研究迄今很少。这项研究将填补这一空白,并引发对印度尼西亚工作贫困的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The impact of technical change on income inequality in Vietnam Asymmetric thresholds of macroeconomic volatility's impact on stock volatility in developing economies: a study in Vietnam Mobile money, food security and coping strategies in a post-conflict and fragile context: evidence from Burundi The effect of financial inclusion and economic integration on green growth in ASEAN Optimum firm size in Vietnam: does subcontracting matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1