Human cystic echinococcosis: Serological diagnosis by indirect hemagglutination test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunoelectrophoresis, and immunoblotting in surgically confirmed patients versus cases diagnosed by imaging techniques

Abstract

Introduction

Human cystic echinococcosis (CE) diagnosis is based on imaging findings and serology. Serology is the first-line test followed by imaging tests.

Materials and methods

A total of 268 serum samples from CE patients were included in this study. The serodiagnosis was made simultaneously by indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunoblotting test (IB), and immunoelectrophoresis (IEP).

Results

In serum samples belonging to surgically confirmed CE patients, we observed a percentage of positivity of 83.7% [77.2%–89.0%] and 80.7% [73.9%–86.4%] for IHA and IgG-ELISA, respectively. IgG-IB was associated with a higher positivity rate than IEP with 81.3% [74.6%–86.9%] and 62.0% [54.2%–69.5%], respectively. IHA and ELISA results were analyzed using cut-off generated by receiver operating curves. The best diagnostic performances were achieved by IHA (cut-off ≥ 1/128) and ELISA (> 1.16 index). Sensitivities reported in patients with suggestive imaging findings and positive Echinococcus IB were 86.2% [78.0%–92.2%], 72.5% [62.8%–80.9%], 49.0% [39.0%–59.1%] for IHA, IgG-ELISA, and IEP, respectively. All tests gave false negative results in the confirmed CE group. Overall, 18.6% of negative results were obtained by IgG-IB test. Cross-reactivities with non-hydatid serum samples were observed in all tests. Only one patient carrying Taenia saginata serum cross-reacted with 8/12 kDa band by IB. We observed specificity at 73% [63.2%–81.4%], 87% [78.8%–92.9%], 99% [94.6%–100.0%], and 99% [94.6%–100.0%] with IHA, IgG-ELISA, IEP, and IgG-IB, respectively. Serology was less sensitive (74%) in lung cysts. Sensitivity was better in liver cysts, especially by IgG-IB (96%).