Forest policy goals in Poland in light of the current forestry aims in Europe Part 5. Towards a new forestry development strategy in Poland

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences USDA Forest Service - Research Papers PNW-RP Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.2478/frp-2018-0036
A. Kaliszewski
{"title":"Forest policy goals in Poland in light of the current forestry aims in Europe Part 5. Towards a new forestry development strategy in Poland","authors":"A. Kaliszewski","doi":"10.2478/frp-2018-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this paper was to review and evaluate drafts of forest policy documents that have been developed for the purpose of updating the Polish “National Forest Policy” of 1997, but never entered into force. A total of 14 documents were covered in this analysis including 13 Regional Operational Programmes of the National Forest Policy and the draft of the National Forest Programme (NFP) developed in 2000–2005, as well as nearly 300 recommendations for the “second” NFP, elaborated in 2012–2016. Very soon after the “National Forest Policy” came into force, it turned out that it needed to be adjusted to changing legal, social and economic conditions. The first attempts to revise and amend the document were made already in 2000. As a result, until 2004, 17 Regional Operational Programmes of the National Forestry Policy were developed and, on that basis, until mid-2005 a draft for a new NFP was worked out. However, the draft was neither adopted nor did it ever enter into force. The second attempt to work out the NFP was made in 2012 and resulted in the development of nearly 300 recommendations to the programme. However, to date, the NFP itself has not been finished. Most of the documents examined here refer to the current priorities of the European forest policy, and thus they would close gaps in the Polish “National Forest Policy”. In this context, the recommendations to the “second” NFP are of great importance, because they were prepared through a wide participation of various stakeholders and they refer to a wide range of problems, propose specific legal regulations, as well as indicate directions for further development of the Polish forest sector. However, the completion of the NFP is a matter of political decision that rests with the Council of Ministers.","PeriodicalId":35347,"journal":{"name":"USDA Forest Service - Research Papers PNW-RP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"USDA Forest Service - Research Papers PNW-RP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/frp-2018-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this paper was to review and evaluate drafts of forest policy documents that have been developed for the purpose of updating the Polish “National Forest Policy” of 1997, but never entered into force. A total of 14 documents were covered in this analysis including 13 Regional Operational Programmes of the National Forest Policy and the draft of the National Forest Programme (NFP) developed in 2000–2005, as well as nearly 300 recommendations for the “second” NFP, elaborated in 2012–2016. Very soon after the “National Forest Policy” came into force, it turned out that it needed to be adjusted to changing legal, social and economic conditions. The first attempts to revise and amend the document were made already in 2000. As a result, until 2004, 17 Regional Operational Programmes of the National Forestry Policy were developed and, on that basis, until mid-2005 a draft for a new NFP was worked out. However, the draft was neither adopted nor did it ever enter into force. The second attempt to work out the NFP was made in 2012 and resulted in the development of nearly 300 recommendations to the programme. However, to date, the NFP itself has not been finished. Most of the documents examined here refer to the current priorities of the European forest policy, and thus they would close gaps in the Polish “National Forest Policy”. In this context, the recommendations to the “second” NFP are of great importance, because they were prepared through a wide participation of various stakeholders and they refer to a wide range of problems, propose specific legal regulations, as well as indicate directions for further development of the Polish forest sector. However, the completion of the NFP is a matter of political decision that rests with the Council of Ministers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据欧洲目前的林业目标,波兰的森林政策目标第5部分。迈向波兰新的林业发展战略
本文的目的是审查和评价为更新波兰1997年“国家森林政策”而制定的森林政策文件草案,但这些文件尚未生效。本次分析共涉及14份文件,其中包括2000-2005年制定的国家森林政策的13个区域业务计划和国家森林计划草案,以及2012-2016年制定的“第二次”国家森林政策的近300项建议。“国家森林政策”实施后不久,人们发现它需要根据不断变化的法律、社会和经济条件进行调整。第一次修改和修改该文件是在2000年。因此,到2004年为止,制定了17个国家林业政策区域业务方案,并在此基础上直到2005年年中拟订了新的国家林业政策草案。然而,该草案既未获得通过,也从未生效。2012年第二次尝试制定国家方案,结果为该方案制定了近300项建议。然而,到目前为止,NFP本身还没有完成。这里审查的大多数文件都提到欧洲森林政策目前的优先事项,因此它们将弥补波兰“国家森林政策”中的空白。在这方面,向“第二个”国家森林方案提出的建议非常重要,因为这些建议是在各利益攸关方的广泛参与下编写的,它们提到了广泛的问题,提出了具体的法律条例,并指出了波兰森林部门进一步发展的方向。但是,国家方案的完成是一个由部长理事会作出政治决定的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
USDA Forest Service - Research Papers PNW-RP
USDA Forest Service - Research Papers PNW-RP Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recreation in nature reserves – preferences and satisfaction of tourists visiting the Polesie National Park Application of terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventory – an overview of selected issues Decline of Black Alder Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. along the Narewka River in the Białowieża Forest District Quality of Scots pine, European beech and pedunculate oak grown from sowing on soil with different compaction levels Multiplex detection of Phytophthora spp. using the Fluidigm platform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1