{"title":"Moving From Fragmented to Seamless Sense-Making in Blended Learning","authors":"Bi Xiaofang","doi":"10.13152/ijrvet.8.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Sense-making, understood as meaning making or giving meaning to experience, is an integral part of everyday life, work and learning, and is a process critical in enabling people to recognise how and when to respond to situations appropriately so that they can resolve problems effectively (Weick et al., 2005). Earlier studies on sense-making in educational or organizational settings (e.g. Harverly et al., 2020; Weick et al., 2005) tended to focus on the sense-making process per se in particular setting such as classrooms or organizations, few of them have paid much attention to the sense-making process in blended learning (BL). BL in vocational training mainly aims to enable adult learners to apply what was learnt in classrooms to solve authentic problems in workplaces or simulated settings. High quality of sense-making is crucial to help the learners achieve the aim. This timely study is to offer a comparative look at how different dynamics of BL interplay together to mediate the quality of sense-making in achieving learning outcomes. The dynamics include industry and training connections, policy and institutional contexts, the inhabited pedagogical practices and curriculum design. Methods: This study adopted phenomenological (Moran, 2000) and semi-ethnographic approaches (Hammersley, 2010), including semi-structured interviews, observations, analysis of relevant documents (e.g. curriculum and learning materials) to capture the rich data in case studies to understand learners’ sense-making experience in BL. Researchers focused on seeking to understand how different environments, tools and artefacts mediate the quality of sense-making as the learners progressed through their learning journey. To triangulate the data, adult educators, curriculum designers and where possible, workplace supervisors, were also interviewed and observed for their perceptions and behaviours in learners’ sense-making in BL. Findings: The findings from two different BL courses (ICT and HR) surface that the degree to which learners’ sense-making is fragmented (low quality) or seamless (high quality) is mediated by the interplay of different contextual factors in BL in multiple ways, such as, the connections (or not) with industry, the use (or not) of authentic problems and tasks. Conclusion: The interplay between different dynamics in BL is of great importance to mediate the curriculum design and pedagogical approaches used in BL for high quality of sense-making of adult learners in vocational training.","PeriodicalId":37080,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13152/ijrvet.8.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Sense-making, understood as meaning making or giving meaning to experience, is an integral part of everyday life, work and learning, and is a process critical in enabling people to recognise how and when to respond to situations appropriately so that they can resolve problems effectively (Weick et al., 2005). Earlier studies on sense-making in educational or organizational settings (e.g. Harverly et al., 2020; Weick et al., 2005) tended to focus on the sense-making process per se in particular setting such as classrooms or organizations, few of them have paid much attention to the sense-making process in blended learning (BL). BL in vocational training mainly aims to enable adult learners to apply what was learnt in classrooms to solve authentic problems in workplaces or simulated settings. High quality of sense-making is crucial to help the learners achieve the aim. This timely study is to offer a comparative look at how different dynamics of BL interplay together to mediate the quality of sense-making in achieving learning outcomes. The dynamics include industry and training connections, policy and institutional contexts, the inhabited pedagogical practices and curriculum design. Methods: This study adopted phenomenological (Moran, 2000) and semi-ethnographic approaches (Hammersley, 2010), including semi-structured interviews, observations, analysis of relevant documents (e.g. curriculum and learning materials) to capture the rich data in case studies to understand learners’ sense-making experience in BL. Researchers focused on seeking to understand how different environments, tools and artefacts mediate the quality of sense-making as the learners progressed through their learning journey. To triangulate the data, adult educators, curriculum designers and where possible, workplace supervisors, were also interviewed and observed for their perceptions and behaviours in learners’ sense-making in BL. Findings: The findings from two different BL courses (ICT and HR) surface that the degree to which learners’ sense-making is fragmented (low quality) or seamless (high quality) is mediated by the interplay of different contextual factors in BL in multiple ways, such as, the connections (or not) with industry, the use (or not) of authentic problems and tasks. Conclusion: The interplay between different dynamics in BL is of great importance to mediate the curriculum design and pedagogical approaches used in BL for high quality of sense-making of adult learners in vocational training.
语境:意义构建,被理解为意义构建或赋予经验意义,是日常生活、工作和学习的一个组成部分,是一个关键的过程,它使人们能够认识到如何以及何时对情况做出适当的反应,从而有效地解决问题(Weick et al., 2005)。早期关于教育或组织环境中意义构建的研究(例如Harverly et al., 2020;Weick et al., 2005)倾向于关注特定环境(如教室或组织)中意义生成过程本身,很少有人关注混合式学习(BL)中的意义生成过程。职业培训中的BL主要是为了使成人学习者能够将课堂上学到的知识应用于解决工作场所或模拟环境中的真实问题。高质量的意义构建是帮助学习者实现目标的关键。这项及时的研究提供了一个比较的视角,看看不同的BL动态是如何相互作用的,以调解实现学习成果的意义建构的质量。动态包括行业和培训联系,政策和制度背景,居住的教学实践和课程设计。方法:本研究采用现象学(Moran, 2000)和半民族志方法(Hammersley, 2010),包括半结构化访谈、观察、相关文件(如课程和学习材料)分析,以获取案例研究中的丰富数据,了解学习者在BL中的意义构建体验。当学习者在他们的学习过程中取得进展时,工具和人工制品调节了意义形成的质量。为了对数据进行三角测量,我们还采访了成人教育工作者、课程设计师,如果可能的话,还采访了工作场所主管,并观察了他们对学习者在BL中意义建构的看法和行为。两门不同的BL课程(ICT和HR)的研究结果表明,学习者的意义构建是碎片化(低质量)还是无缝化(高质量)的程度是由BL中不同背景因素以多种方式相互作用介导的,例如与行业的联系(或不联系),真实问题和任务的使用(或不使用)。结论:在职业培训中,不同动机间的相互作用对指导成人学习者的课程设计和教学方法具有重要意义。