On the Progression of Belief

Artif. Intell. Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.24963/kr.2021/44
Daxin Liu, Qihui Feng
{"title":"On the Progression of Belief","authors":"Daxin Liu, Qihui Feng","doi":"10.24963/kr.2021/44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on weighted possible-world semantics, Belle and Lakemeyer recently proposed the logic DS, a probabilistic extension of a modal variant of the situation calculus with a model of belief. The logic has many desirable properties like full introspection and it is able to precisely capture the beliefs of a probabilistic knowledge base in terms of the notion of only-believing. While the proposal is intuitively appealing, it is unclear how to do planning with such logic. The reason behind this is that the logic lacks projection reasoning mechanisms. Projection reasoning, in general, is to decide what holds after actions. Two main solutions to projection exist: regression and progression. Roughly, regression reduces a query about the future to a query about the initial state while progression, on the other hand, changes the initial state according to the effects of actions and then checks whether the formula holds in the updated state. In this paper, we study projection by progression in the logic DS. It is known that the progression of a categorical knowledge base wrt a noise-free action corresponds to what is only-known after that action. We show how to progress a type of probabilistic knowledge base wrt noisy actions by the notion of only-believing after actions. Our notion of only-believing is closely related to Lin and Reiter's notion of progression.","PeriodicalId":8496,"journal":{"name":"Artif. Intell.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artif. Intell.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2021/44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Based on weighted possible-world semantics, Belle and Lakemeyer recently proposed the logic DS, a probabilistic extension of a modal variant of the situation calculus with a model of belief. The logic has many desirable properties like full introspection and it is able to precisely capture the beliefs of a probabilistic knowledge base in terms of the notion of only-believing. While the proposal is intuitively appealing, it is unclear how to do planning with such logic. The reason behind this is that the logic lacks projection reasoning mechanisms. Projection reasoning, in general, is to decide what holds after actions. Two main solutions to projection exist: regression and progression. Roughly, regression reduces a query about the future to a query about the initial state while progression, on the other hand, changes the initial state according to the effects of actions and then checks whether the formula holds in the updated state. In this paper, we study projection by progression in the logic DS. It is known that the progression of a categorical knowledge base wrt a noise-free action corresponds to what is only-known after that action. We show how to progress a type of probabilistic knowledge base wrt noisy actions by the notion of only-believing after actions. Our notion of only-believing is closely related to Lin and Reiter's notion of progression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论信仰的发展
Belle和Lakemeyer最近提出了基于加权可能世界语义的逻辑DS,这是基于信念模型的情景演算的模态变体的概率扩展。该逻辑具有许多理想的属性,如完全自省,并且能够根据只相信的概念精确地捕获概率知识库的信念。虽然这个提议在直觉上很有吸引力,但如何按照这种逻辑进行规划尚不清楚。这背后的原因是逻辑缺乏投射推理机制。投射推理,一般来说,是决定行动之后会发生什么。存在两种主要的投影解决方案:回归和进程。粗略地说,回归将对未来的查询简化为对初始状态的查询,而另一方面,进度根据动作的效果更改初始状态,然后检查公式是否在更新状态下成立。本文研究了逻辑DS中的递进投影。众所周知,分类知识库在无噪声操作中的进展与该操作之后的唯一已知内容相对应。我们展示了如何通过行动后才相信的概念来推进一种基于噪声行动的概率知识库。我们的“唯信”概念与林和瑞特的“进步”概念密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Entropy Estimation via Uniformization Task-Guided IRL in POMDPs that Scales Measuring power in coalitional games with friends, enemies and allies Defense coordination in security games: Equilibrium analysis and mechanism design Reasoning about general preference relations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1