The digital transformation of knowledge order: a model for the analysis of the epistemic crisis

C. Neuberger, Anne Bartsch, Romy Fröhlich, Thomas Hanitzsch, C. Reinemann, Johanna Schindler
{"title":"The digital transformation of knowledge order: a model for the analysis of the epistemic crisis","authors":"C. Neuberger, Anne Bartsch, Romy Fröhlich, Thomas Hanitzsch, C. Reinemann, Johanna Schindler","doi":"10.1080/23808985.2023.2169950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In a proclaimed age of ‘post-truth,’ scholars have raised concerns about the spread of false information and the questioning of epistemic authorities. In this paper, we develop an analytical model to capture the digital transformation of knowledge order. Drawing on insights from social epistemology, sociology and history of knowledge, and media history, we identify epistemic practices as basic elements of knowledge order. We then analyze how epistemic practices are organized into an overarching structure of knowledge phases, contexts, roles, and hierarchies. Digital media tend to destabilize the traditional knowledge order. This destabilization is characterized by a more flexible order of phases, a dissolution of boundaries between contexts, an opening of professional roles to new actors, and a flattening of hierarchies.","PeriodicalId":36859,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the International Communication Association","volume":"47 1","pages":"180 - 201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the International Communication Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2023.2169950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT In a proclaimed age of ‘post-truth,’ scholars have raised concerns about the spread of false information and the questioning of epistemic authorities. In this paper, we develop an analytical model to capture the digital transformation of knowledge order. Drawing on insights from social epistemology, sociology and history of knowledge, and media history, we identify epistemic practices as basic elements of knowledge order. We then analyze how epistemic practices are organized into an overarching structure of knowledge phases, contexts, roles, and hierarchies. Digital media tend to destabilize the traditional knowledge order. This destabilization is characterized by a more flexible order of phases, a dissolution of boundaries between contexts, an opening of professional roles to new actors, and a flattening of hierarchies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识秩序的数字化转型:一个知识危机分析的模型
在一个被称为“后真相”的时代,学者们对虚假信息的传播和对认知权威的质疑提出了担忧。在本文中,我们开发了一个分析模型来捕捉知识秩序的数字化转型。根据社会认识论、社会学和知识史以及媒体史的见解,我们将认识论实践确定为知识秩序的基本要素。然后,我们分析了认知实践是如何组织成知识阶段、背景、角色和层次的总体结构的。数字媒体往往会破坏传统的知识秩序。这种不稳定的特点是阶段的顺序更加灵活,背景之间界限的消解,职业角色向新参与者开放,以及等级制度的扁平化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Four decades of biological measurement advancing mediated communication theory: a review of literature from 1980–2020 What is ‘Being There’? an ontology of the immersive experience Relational turbulence during family transitions: a lifespan perspective and roadmap for future research An enduring divide: revisiting the mass and family communication dichotomy and exploring paths of integration Mapping media literacy impact in the U.S.: a review of literature and call for equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1