Accuracy of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in predicting placenta accreta: A retrospective study

P. Jaisankar, M. Kumar, R. Gowtham, T. Vinoth
{"title":"Accuracy of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in predicting placenta accreta: A retrospective study","authors":"P. Jaisankar, M. Kumar, R. Gowtham, T. Vinoth","doi":"10.4103/cmi.cmi_85_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Placenta accreta can cause significant morbidity and mortality in pregnant women. Timely diagnosis is essential for management. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in predicting placenta accreta. Methodology: A retrospective study was conducted at our institute from April 2014 to September 2017. Pregnant women with suspected placenta accrete were recruited for the study. Medical records of pregnant women who have undergone both USG and prenatal MRI were included. The accuracy of USG and MRI was compared. Results: Among the 56 cases evaluated in the study, the diagnosis was accurately obtained with ultrasonography in 75% of cases and with MRI in 68.51% of cases. Sensitivity for placenta accreta was 97.29% for USG and 78.37% for MRI. Specificities were 31.57% for USG and 47.05% for MRI. The positive predictive value was 73.46% for USG and 76.31% for MRI. Conclusion: Although a definite demarcation could not be obtained from the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the placenta accrete with ultrasonography and MRI, the diagnostic accuracy may be taken as a definite pointer. Hence, ultrasonography remains the mainstay of diagnosis for placenta accrete; and MRI can be considered complementary in cases with few USG signs.","PeriodicalId":72734,"journal":{"name":"Current medical issues","volume":"124 1","pages":"83 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current medical issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cmi.cmi_85_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Placenta accreta can cause significant morbidity and mortality in pregnant women. Timely diagnosis is essential for management. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in predicting placenta accreta. Methodology: A retrospective study was conducted at our institute from April 2014 to September 2017. Pregnant women with suspected placenta accrete were recruited for the study. Medical records of pregnant women who have undergone both USG and prenatal MRI were included. The accuracy of USG and MRI was compared. Results: Among the 56 cases evaluated in the study, the diagnosis was accurately obtained with ultrasonography in 75% of cases and with MRI in 68.51% of cases. Sensitivity for placenta accreta was 97.29% for USG and 78.37% for MRI. Specificities were 31.57% for USG and 47.05% for MRI. The positive predictive value was 73.46% for USG and 76.31% for MRI. Conclusion: Although a definite demarcation could not be obtained from the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the placenta accrete with ultrasonography and MRI, the diagnostic accuracy may be taken as a definite pointer. Hence, ultrasonography remains the mainstay of diagnosis for placenta accrete; and MRI can be considered complementary in cases with few USG signs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声和磁共振成像预测胎盘增生的准确性:回顾性研究
背景:妊娠妇女胎盘增生可引起显著的发病率和死亡率。及时诊断对治疗至关重要。本研究旨在评估超声(USG)和磁共振成像(MRI)技术预测胎盘增生的准确性。方法:回顾性研究于2014年4月至2017年9月在我院进行。研究招募了疑似胎盘增生的孕妇。包括同时进行USG和产前MRI的孕妇的医疗记录。比较USG和MRI的准确性。结果:本组56例病例中,超声诊断正确率为75%,MRI诊断正确率为68.51%。USG和MRI对胎盘增生的敏感性分别为97.29%和78.37%。USG和MRI的特异性分别为31.57%和47.05%。USG阳性预测值为73.46%,MRI阳性预测值为76.31%。结论:虽然超声和MRI对胎盘积液的敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值尚不能明确划分,但其诊断准确性可作为明确的指标。因此,超声检查仍然是诊断胎盘增生的主要手段;在USG征象较少的病例中,MRI可作为补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Should Medicine be Taught in Leading Medical Languages or the Mother Tongue? Utility of Sensate Pedicled Medial Thigh Perforator Flaps in Treating Recurrent Ischial Ulcers in Individuals with Cauda Equina Lesions and Spinal Dysraphism – A Retrospective Analysis Compound Odontome Causing Agenesis of Mandibular Canine Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis Beyond Childhood in India Rhythm Generating Mechanisms in Rat Sinoatrial Node
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1