Critical vulnerabilities for diversion of controlled substances in the emergency department: Observations and healthcare failure mode and effect analysis

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of patient safety and risk management Pub Date : 2023-05-10 DOI:10.1177/25160435231174309
Maaike de Vries, M. Fan, Dorothy Tscheng, M. Hamilton, P. Trbovich
{"title":"Critical vulnerabilities for diversion of controlled substances in the emergency department: Observations and healthcare failure mode and effect analysis","authors":"Maaike de Vries, M. Fan, Dorothy Tscheng, M. Hamilton, P. Trbovich","doi":"10.1177/25160435231174309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Drug theft by healthcare workers is a recognized problem in emergency departments (EDs) that can lead to patient, healthcare worker, and organization harm. Diversion takes various forms, including tampering with syringes, pilfering from waste containers and falsely documenting drug administration. Before implementing risk-mitigating interventions, we need a detailed understanding of the vulnerabilities in ED medication-use processes. This study sought to identify the critical failure modes (CFMs) within EDs that increase diversion risk and characterize the system factors contributing to CFMs. Methods Between June 2018 and February 2019, we conducted observations in two Ontario EDs. Observers recorded tasks carried out by nurses, pharmacists, and physicians. We performed a Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis, informed by the observation data, to proactively identify CFMs in the medication-use processes. Failure modes were coded for their effects on diversion risk and the contributing system factors. Results We identified 28 CFMs that increase diversion risk by enabling inappropriate access to controlled substances or compromising documentation. CFMs are multifactorial, stemming primarily from factors related to person (e.g., intent to divert) and tools/technology (e.g., limited automatic reconciliation of records), followed by organization (e.g., practices that diffuse accountability), environment (e.g., workspaces that obscure illicit behaviours), and task (e.g., unstructured processes leading to lapses). Conclusion The study findings inform opportunities to revise vulnerable processes and bolster safeguards, decreasing diversion risk and protecting patients and healthcare workers.","PeriodicalId":73888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","volume":"1 1","pages":"99 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435231174309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Drug theft by healthcare workers is a recognized problem in emergency departments (EDs) that can lead to patient, healthcare worker, and organization harm. Diversion takes various forms, including tampering with syringes, pilfering from waste containers and falsely documenting drug administration. Before implementing risk-mitigating interventions, we need a detailed understanding of the vulnerabilities in ED medication-use processes. This study sought to identify the critical failure modes (CFMs) within EDs that increase diversion risk and characterize the system factors contributing to CFMs. Methods Between June 2018 and February 2019, we conducted observations in two Ontario EDs. Observers recorded tasks carried out by nurses, pharmacists, and physicians. We performed a Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis, informed by the observation data, to proactively identify CFMs in the medication-use processes. Failure modes were coded for their effects on diversion risk and the contributing system factors. Results We identified 28 CFMs that increase diversion risk by enabling inappropriate access to controlled substances or compromising documentation. CFMs are multifactorial, stemming primarily from factors related to person (e.g., intent to divert) and tools/technology (e.g., limited automatic reconciliation of records), followed by organization (e.g., practices that diffuse accountability), environment (e.g., workspaces that obscure illicit behaviours), and task (e.g., unstructured processes leading to lapses). Conclusion The study findings inform opportunities to revise vulnerable processes and bolster safeguards, decreasing diversion risk and protecting patients and healthcare workers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科受控物质转移的关键脆弱性:观察和医疗失败模式及效果分析
医疗工作者的药物盗窃是急诊科(EDs)公认的一个问题,它可能导致患者、医疗工作者和组织的伤害。转移药品的形式多种多样,包括篡改注射器、从废物容器中偷窃和伪造药品管理文件。在实施降低风险的干预措施之前,我们需要详细了解ED用药过程中的脆弱性。本研究旨在识别EDs中增加导流风险的关键失效模式(cfm),并描述导致cfm的系统因素。方法在2018年6月至2019年2月期间,我们对安大略省的两名ed进行了观察。观察员记录了护士、药剂师和医生执行的任务。根据观察数据,我们进行了医疗失败模式和效果分析,以主动识别药物使用过程中的cfm。根据失效模式对导流风险的影响和系统影响因素对其进行编码。结果:我们确定了28个cfm,这些cfm通过不适当地获取受控物质或损害文件而增加了转移风险。cfm是多因素的,主要源于与人员(例如,转移的意图)和工具/技术(例如,有限的记录自动调节)相关的因素,其次是组织(例如,分散责任的实践)、环境(例如,模糊非法行为的工作空间)和任务(例如,导致失误的非结构化过程)。结论:研究结果为修改脆弱流程和加强保障措施提供了机会,降低了转移风险,保护了患者和医护人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) and safety management systems: An integrated approach to managing safety in healthcare Challenges of integrating patient safety into nursing curricula: An integrative literature review Patient safety near misses – Still missing opportunities to learn A five-step approach to safer skin surgery Gaps in patient safety: Areas that need our attention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1