Corrective Feedback Interventions and EFL Learners’ Pronunciation: A Case of –s or –es Ending Words

{"title":"Corrective Feedback Interventions and EFL Learners’ Pronunciation: A Case of –s or –es Ending Words","authors":"Ali Mohammadi Darabad","doi":"10.5296/IJLD.V4I1.5010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This quasi-experimental study aimed to investigate the impact of two corrective feedback techniques (recasts and prompts) on students’ performance in pronunciation. Seventy-two students from SAMA High School in Ardabil were assigned as the participants of this study. The data were collected from 3 classroom-based studies; the two experimental conditions – one received corrective feedback in the form of recasts and the other in the form of prompts – and a control group. The instructional intervention, which was spread over a period of two weeks, targeted the final –s and –es endings pronunciation, a difficult aspect of English pronunciation for these learners. To measure the students’ prior knowledge of the targeted pronunciation, a pre-test was designed. Immediate post-tests were administrated after the treatments. Delayed post-tests were administrated 2 weeks after the immediate post-test. Fill-in-the-blank, oral picture-description, and read-aloud tasks formed the materials of this study. Comparison of group means across testing sessions using a one-way and repeated measure ANOVA consistently revealed that corrective feedback conditions had a positive effect on the learners’ pronunciation accuracy. The effects of recasts were greater than those of prompts for increasing accuracy in the targeted pronunciation of final English –s and –es ending words. Keywords: Corrective feedback, Recasts, Prompts, Pronunciation, Oral accuracy.","PeriodicalId":38847,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development","volume":"29 1","pages":"40-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/IJLD.V4I1.5010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This quasi-experimental study aimed to investigate the impact of two corrective feedback techniques (recasts and prompts) on students’ performance in pronunciation. Seventy-two students from SAMA High School in Ardabil were assigned as the participants of this study. The data were collected from 3 classroom-based studies; the two experimental conditions – one received corrective feedback in the form of recasts and the other in the form of prompts – and a control group. The instructional intervention, which was spread over a period of two weeks, targeted the final –s and –es endings pronunciation, a difficult aspect of English pronunciation for these learners. To measure the students’ prior knowledge of the targeted pronunciation, a pre-test was designed. Immediate post-tests were administrated after the treatments. Delayed post-tests were administrated 2 weeks after the immediate post-test. Fill-in-the-blank, oral picture-description, and read-aloud tasks formed the materials of this study. Comparison of group means across testing sessions using a one-way and repeated measure ANOVA consistently revealed that corrective feedback conditions had a positive effect on the learners’ pronunciation accuracy. The effects of recasts were greater than those of prompts for increasing accuracy in the targeted pronunciation of final English –s and –es ending words. Keywords: Corrective feedback, Recasts, Prompts, Pronunciation, Oral accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纠正反馈干预与英语学习者发音:以-s或-es结尾的单词为例
本拟实验研究旨在探讨两种纠正反馈技术(重铸和提示)对学生发音表现的影响。来自阿达比尔SAMA高中的72名学生被分配为本研究的参与者。数据收集自3个基于课堂的研究;在两种实验条件下——一种以重铸的形式接受纠正反馈,另一种以提示的形式接受纠正反馈——还有一个对照组。这项为期两周的教学干预针对的是-s和-es结尾的发音,这对这些学习者来说是英语发音的一个难点。为了测量学生对目标发音的先验知识,我们设计了一个前测。治疗后立即进行后验。延迟后测于即时后测后2周进行。填空任务、口头图片描述任务和大声朗读任务构成了本研究的材料。使用单向和重复测量方差分析比较各组测试的均值一致显示纠正反馈条件对学习者的发音准确性有积极影响。重铸的效果比提示提高英语最后以-s和-es结尾的单词的目标发音准确性的效果要大。关键词:纠正反馈,重铸,提示,发音,口语准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Gamification Strengthens Behavioral Intention to Motivate Customer’s Loyalty towards Using E-banking and E-wallets on Gen Z Mapping the Landscape of Research on Knowledge Workers: A Bibliometric Review The Influence of Institutional Resources on Doctorate Degree Enrolment and Completion Rates in Selected Public Universities Kenya Strategies Used in EFL Reading Comprehension: The Case Study of Seven Chinese High School Students Teaching in Digital Age: College of Education Students and in-Service Teachers’ Confidence in Integrating Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in their Educational Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1