Ichthyofauna of Gibe Sheleko National Park and Some Morphometric Relationships of Fish of the Tributary Rivers, Southern Ethiopia

IF 0.6 Q4 FISHERIES Journal of Fisheries Pub Date : 2021-02-10 DOI:10.21203/RS.3.RS-157750/V1
S. Mekonen, Abera Hailu
{"title":"Ichthyofauna of Gibe Sheleko National Park and Some Morphometric Relationships of Fish of the Tributary Rivers, Southern Ethiopia","authors":"S. Mekonen, Abera Hailu","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.RS-157750/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study was carried out along a tributary of Gibe Sheleko National Park to investigate the diversity, relative abundance and morphometric characteristics of fish. By using monofilament gill-nets, fish were collected, their species identifiedand their morphometric data measured. A total of 10 species were identified, dominated overall by Synodontis schall (28.52%), followed by Labeobarbus nedgia (18.88%) and Labeobarbus intermedius (14.06%). According to the Index of Relative Importance (IRI), S. schall was also first (49.13%), followed by L. intermedius (15.49%). There were no significance differences in the IRI values of fish and relative abundance between the dry and wet season (p > 0.05). Synodontis schall had the largest girth (23.1 cm), but Clarias gariepinus had the largest eye diameter (8.4 mm) and body weight (1713.4 g). Heterobranchus longifilis was first in total fork and standard length (64.7 cm, 64.7 cm and 59.8 cm, respectively). However, the paired t test of the total body length was not significantly different from the fork length (Pn> 0.05), but not showing statistical differences from standard length, weight and girth (P < 0.05). Gibe River had a higher number of species (N) than Wabe River in both seasons. The Shannon Diversity Index (H') in Gibe River was also higher (2.09) than Wabe (1.84) during the dry season, but lowest in the wet season (1.52 and 1.57, respectively). Furthermore, both (N) and (H') were not statistically different between tributaries and seasons (p > 0.05). Generally, differences in sampling habitats and fishing effort might have contributed to discovered variants findings. Fishery development should be implemented in the Park to use the fish resource sustainably.","PeriodicalId":55944,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fisheries","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-157750/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was carried out along a tributary of Gibe Sheleko National Park to investigate the diversity, relative abundance and morphometric characteristics of fish. By using monofilament gill-nets, fish were collected, their species identifiedand their morphometric data measured. A total of 10 species were identified, dominated overall by Synodontis schall (28.52%), followed by Labeobarbus nedgia (18.88%) and Labeobarbus intermedius (14.06%). According to the Index of Relative Importance (IRI), S. schall was also first (49.13%), followed by L. intermedius (15.49%). There were no significance differences in the IRI values of fish and relative abundance between the dry and wet season (p > 0.05). Synodontis schall had the largest girth (23.1 cm), but Clarias gariepinus had the largest eye diameter (8.4 mm) and body weight (1713.4 g). Heterobranchus longifilis was first in total fork and standard length (64.7 cm, 64.7 cm and 59.8 cm, respectively). However, the paired t test of the total body length was not significantly different from the fork length (Pn> 0.05), but not showing statistical differences from standard length, weight and girth (P < 0.05). Gibe River had a higher number of species (N) than Wabe River in both seasons. The Shannon Diversity Index (H') in Gibe River was also higher (2.09) than Wabe (1.84) during the dry season, but lowest in the wet season (1.52 and 1.57, respectively). Furthermore, both (N) and (H') were not statistically different between tributaries and seasons (p > 0.05). Generally, differences in sampling habitats and fishing effort might have contributed to discovered variants findings. Fishery development should be implemented in the Park to use the fish resource sustainably.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚南部Gibe Sheleko国家公园鱼类区系与支流河流鱼类的形态关系
本研究沿着Gibe Sheleko国家公园的一条支流进行,以调查鱼类的多样性、相对丰度和形态特征。采用单丝刺网采集鱼类,鉴定鱼种,测定形态特征。共鉴定出10种,总体上以小唇唇虫(Synodontis schall)为主,占28.52%,其次为negia Labeobarbus negia,占18.88%,中间Labeobarbus intermedius,占14.06%。相对重要性指数(IRI)显示,沙蝇(49.13%)居首,中蝇(15.49%)次之。鱼的IRI值和相对丰度在干湿季节间无显著差异(p < 0.05)。长尾异枝(Heterobranchus longifilis)的总叉长和标准长分别为64.7 cm、64.7 cm和59.8 cm,长尾异枝(Clarias gariepinus)最大,眼直径为8.4 mm,体重为1713.4 g。但经配对t检验,总体长与叉长差异无统计学意义(Pn> 0.05),与标准体长、体重、周长差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。吉布河在两个季节的种数(N)均高于瓦贝河。干季吉贝河的香农多样性指数(H’)为2.09,高于Wabe河(1.84),湿季最低,分别为1.52和1.57。此外,(N)和(H’)在支流和季节之间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。一般来说,取样栖息地和捕鱼努力的差异可能导致了发现的变异结果。在园区内实施渔业开发,实现鱼类资源的可持续利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Production and economics of Gangetic mystus (Mystus cavasius) farming under different feed restriction periods in cages of floodplain ecosystem Determining overwintering performance and economic viability of monosex tilapia fingerling production in hapa cum cage aquaculture system for Bangladesh's haor fishers Reproductive biology of the silky shark Carcharhinus falciformis (Müller & Henle, 1839) in waters off Côte d’Ivoire (West Africa) Anaesthetic effects of different concentrations of sodium bicarbonate on common carp (Cyprinus carpio) Organoleptic qualities and proximate composition of fish grown in good aquaculture practice-based carp fattening pond
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1