Eficacia y seguridad de una estrategia basal plus en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en la práctica clínica especializada. El estudio Basal Plus en España

Manuel Pérez-Maraver , Gracia Romero Meliá , Jordi Caballero Corchuelo , en representación del estudio Basal Plus
{"title":"Eficacia y seguridad de una estrategia basal plus en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en la práctica clínica especializada. El estudio Basal Plus en España","authors":"Manuel Pérez-Maraver ,&nbsp;Gracia Romero Meliá ,&nbsp;Jordi Caballero Corchuelo ,&nbsp;en representación del estudio Basal Plus","doi":"10.1016/j.avdiab.2015.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a Basal Plus strategy using insulin glargine (GLA) as basal insulin and insulin glulisine (GLU) as prandial insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in everyday clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Observational, retrospective study was performed between November 2010 and December 2011 (duration of observation: January-July 2010) in 65 endocrinology departments across Spain on consecutively enrolled T2DM patients previously treated with GLA, to whom one injection of GLU was added at the main meal. Primary analysis was to evaluate the change in HbA<sub>1c</sub> from baseline (start of basal plus therapy, basal visit [BV]) to endpoint (at least after 3 months, basal plus visit [BPV]).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 363 patients were included (age 65<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10 years old, 54% male). After 6 months, the HbA<sub>1c</sub> decreased from 8.5% to 7.4% (–1.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->.8%; 95% CI: 1.0-1.2; p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001). More than a quarter (25.9%) of patients achieved an HbA<sub>1c</sub> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->7.0% (.8% of patients at baseline). The percentage of patients with target fasting plasma glucose values (&lt;<!--> <!-->130<!--> <!-->mg/dl) was 51.0% at baseline (BV), and 62.8% at the endpoint (BPV). Only 3 episodes of severe hypoglycemia were reported, of which none of them was nocturnal.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A Basal plus strategy with once daily insulin glargine plus insulin glulisine at the main meal is effective and safe in improving glycemic control in clinical practice in patients with T2DM previously not on treatment targets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100152,"journal":{"name":"Avances en Diabetología","volume":"31 2","pages":"Pages 64-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.avdiab.2015.01.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avances en Diabetología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134323015000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a Basal Plus strategy using insulin glargine (GLA) as basal insulin and insulin glulisine (GLU) as prandial insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in everyday clinical practice.

Material and methods

Observational, retrospective study was performed between November 2010 and December 2011 (duration of observation: January-July 2010) in 65 endocrinology departments across Spain on consecutively enrolled T2DM patients previously treated with GLA, to whom one injection of GLU was added at the main meal. Primary analysis was to evaluate the change in HbA1c from baseline (start of basal plus therapy, basal visit [BV]) to endpoint (at least after 3 months, basal plus visit [BPV]).

Results

A total of 363 patients were included (age 65 ± 10 years old, 54% male). After 6 months, the HbA1c decreased from 8.5% to 7.4% (–1.1 ± .8%; 95% CI: 1.0-1.2; p < .001). More than a quarter (25.9%) of patients achieved an HbA1c < 7.0% (.8% of patients at baseline). The percentage of patients with target fasting plasma glucose values (< 130 mg/dl) was 51.0% at baseline (BV), and 62.8% at the endpoint (BPV). Only 3 episodes of severe hypoglycemia were reported, of which none of them was nocturnal.

Conclusions

A Basal plus strategy with once daily insulin glargine plus insulin glulisine at the main meal is effective and safe in improving glycemic control in clinical practice in patients with T2DM previously not on treatment targets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基础加策略在2型糖尿病患者专业临床实践中的有效性和安全性。西班牙的Basal Plus研究
目的评价甘精胰岛素(GLA)作为基础胰岛素、甘氨酸胰岛素(GLU)作为膳食胰岛素在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者日常临床应用的有效性和安全性。材料与方法观察性、回顾性研究于2010年11月至2011年12月(观察时间:2010年1月至2010年7月)在西班牙65个内分泌科连续入组曾接受GLA治疗的2型糖尿病患者,在主餐中加入GLU 1针。主要分析是评估HbA1c从基线(开始基础+治疗,基础访视[BV])到终点(至少3个月后,基础+访视[BPV])的变化。结果共纳入363例患者(年龄65±10岁,男性54%)。6个月后,HbA1c从8.5%降至7.4%(-1.1±0.8%;95% ci: 1.0-1.2;p & lt;措施)。超过四分之一(25.9%)的患者达到了HbA1c和lt;(7.0%。8%的基线患者)。达到目标空腹血糖值的患者百分比(<在基线(BV)为51.0%,在终点(BPV)为62.8%。报告3例严重低血糖,均不发生在夜间。结论每日1次甘精胰岛素加主餐胰甘氨酸胰岛素的基础加治疗方案在改善未达到治疗目标的T2DM患者血糖控制方面是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluación de la satisfacción del paciente diabético con la utilización del glucómetro portátil BGSTAR© mediante el cuestionario SATIGLU Escalas de cálculo del riesgo cardiovascular para pacientes con diabetes. ¿Qué son y de qué nos sirven? Reunión anual del grupo de trabajo «islotes pancreáticos» de la Sociedad Española de Diabetes Documento de consenso sobre el tratamiento con infusión subcutánea continua de insulina en el medio hospitalario Claves para avanzar hacia un rol más activo por parte del paciente con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en España
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1