Effect of Propolis as a Preservative Applied to Alpaca (Vicugna Pacos) Meat Hamburger, Huancavelica, Peru

Alfonso Ruiz Rodríguez, F. O. Areche, Oliver Taype Landeo, Olga Vicentina Pacovilca- Alejo, C. C. Z. Montesinos, R. J. M. Yapias, Jeny Yanet Marquez Sulca, T. J. C. Rivera, D. D. C. Flores, Flor Gamarra, O. M. L. Vilca, Jimmy Pablo Echevarría Victorio, B. Camayo-Lapa, Cecilia Yanett Reategui Valladoli, Russbelt Yaulilahua- Huacho, Sami Ullah
{"title":"Effect of Propolis as a Preservative Applied to Alpaca (Vicugna Pacos) Meat Hamburger, Huancavelica, Peru","authors":"Alfonso Ruiz Rodríguez, F. O. Areche, Oliver Taype Landeo, Olga Vicentina Pacovilca- Alejo, C. C. Z. Montesinos, R. J. M. Yapias, Jeny Yanet Marquez Sulca, T. J. C. Rivera, D. D. C. Flores, Flor Gamarra, O. M. L. Vilca, Jimmy Pablo Echevarría Victorio, B. Camayo-Lapa, Cecilia Yanett Reategui Valladoli, Russbelt Yaulilahua- Huacho, Sami Ullah","doi":"10.12944/crnfsj.11.1.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Natural preservatives have less of a negative effect on human health and other systems, making them the superior choice over conventional preservatives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of propolis, a natural preservative, affected the flavour and texture of an artisanal hamburger made with alpaca meat (Vicugna pacos). An experimental design with 5 treatments was established, a control treatment of alpaca hamburger with artificial preservative (T1) and four experimental treatments with the addition of propolis (0.25 ml, 0.50 ml, 0.75 ml and 1.0 ml in 100 g of meat mixture). The Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric variance test and the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test were utilised to examine the data collected from the randomised full blocks design of the experiment. Thirty semi-trained tasters evaluated propolis on its general look, smell, taste, colour, and texture, in addition to its antibacterial effects on Staphylococcus aureus. The results showed that the bacterial count of S. aureus was kept at 1.5x10 CFU/g, which is between the allowable ranges of 102 and 103, suggesting that propolis has the ability to inhibit this bacteria. The sensory tests showed that the addition of propolis does not produce negative effects on the general appearance, smell, taste and texture compared to the control treatment (p > 0.05), only the color was affected (p < 0.05) only in doses greater than 0.5 ml per 100 g of meat mixture. In conclusion, the applicability of propolis as a preservative in the alpaca meat hamburger is verified.","PeriodicalId":10916,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal","volume":"141 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12944/crnfsj.11.1.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural preservatives have less of a negative effect on human health and other systems, making them the superior choice over conventional preservatives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of propolis, a natural preservative, affected the flavour and texture of an artisanal hamburger made with alpaca meat (Vicugna pacos). An experimental design with 5 treatments was established, a control treatment of alpaca hamburger with artificial preservative (T1) and four experimental treatments with the addition of propolis (0.25 ml, 0.50 ml, 0.75 ml and 1.0 ml in 100 g of meat mixture). The Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric variance test and the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test were utilised to examine the data collected from the randomised full blocks design of the experiment. Thirty semi-trained tasters evaluated propolis on its general look, smell, taste, colour, and texture, in addition to its antibacterial effects on Staphylococcus aureus. The results showed that the bacterial count of S. aureus was kept at 1.5x10 CFU/g, which is between the allowable ranges of 102 and 103, suggesting that propolis has the ability to inhibit this bacteria. The sensory tests showed that the addition of propolis does not produce negative effects on the general appearance, smell, taste and texture compared to the control treatment (p > 0.05), only the color was affected (p < 0.05) only in doses greater than 0.5 ml per 100 g of meat mixture. In conclusion, the applicability of propolis as a preservative in the alpaca meat hamburger is verified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蜂胶作为防腐剂在秘鲁万卡维利卡羊驼肉汉堡包中的应用效果
天然防腐剂对人体健康和其他系统的负面影响较小,使其成为比传统防腐剂更好的选择。本研究的目的是评估蜂胶(一种天然防腐剂)对用羊驼肉(Vicugna pacos)制作的手工汉堡包的风味和质地的影响。建立了5个试验设计,分别以添加人工防腐剂(T1)的羊驼汉堡为对照处理和在100 g混合肉液中添加蜂胶(0.25 ml、0.50 ml、0.75 ml、1.0 ml)的4个试验处理。采用Kruskal-Wallis非参数方差检验和Mann-Whitney非参数检验来检验从实验的随机全块设计中收集的数据。30名半训练的品尝师评估蜂胶的外观、气味、味道、颜色和质地,以及对金黄色葡萄球菌的抗菌作用。结果表明,金黄色葡萄球菌的细菌数量保持在1.5 × 10 CFU/g,在允许范围102 ~ 103之间,说明蜂胶具有抑制金黄色葡萄球菌的能力。感官试验结果表明,蜂胶添加量大于0.5 ml / 100 g时,对肉制品的外观、气味、口感和质地均无不良影响(p > 0.05),仅对肉制品的颜色有影响(p < 0.05)。综上所述,验证了蜂胶作为防腐剂在羊驼肉汉堡包中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction and Validation of a New Suchitra Scoring System and Determining the Cut off Value for Healthy Lifestyle Among College Students - Kumbakonam Urban Rural Epidemiological Study- KURES- 8 Phenolic Compounds, Free Radical Scavenging Activity and α-Glucosidase Inhibition Properties of Green, Oolong and Black Sacha Inchi Tea Extract Production and Characterization of Nata from Yam Bean Juice using Komagataeibacter nataicola TISTR 975 The Biological, Biochemical, and Immunological Impact of Broccoli and Green Pea Sprouts on Acrylamide Intoxicated Rats Cholesterol-lowering Effect of Protein Hydrolysates from Lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1