The interobserver reliability of first metatarsal rotational component of axial sesamoid radiographs in hallux valgus

M. García-Limón, J. Ortiz-Garza, A. Espinosa-Uribe, Eduardo R. Carranza-Cantú, J. Meza-Flores, J. Gutierrez-De la O
{"title":"The interobserver reliability of first metatarsal rotational component of axial sesamoid radiographs in hallux valgus","authors":"M. García-Limón, J. Ortiz-Garza, A. Espinosa-Uribe, Eduardo R. Carranza-Cantú, J. Meza-Flores, J. Gutierrez-De la O","doi":"10.30795/jfootankle.2020.v14.1196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Hallux valgus is a progressive triplanar deformity of the forefoot with an important rotational component (RC) in the first metatarsal, which has been associated with recurrence. There is controversy about using weight-bearing vs. non-weight-bearing radiographs in RC measurement. This study aims to assess interobserver reliability for RC of the first metatarsal using a non-weight-bearing sesamoid view, as well as to correlate the hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) and sesamoid position regarding RC. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional and descriptive study was conducted with 81 feet from 48 patients (66.6% female). RC was evaluated regarding the first metatarsal proximal shaft in non-weight-bearing axial metatarsal radiographs and weight-bearing anteroposterior radiographs. Measurements were taken independently by two foot and ankle subspecialists and an orthopedic resident, all of whom were blinded. Results: Statistically significant intraclass correlations (p = 0.02) were obtained for first metatarsal RC assessment among the three observers (95%CI 0.01–0.65; Cronbach’s α =0.41) in non-weight-bearing axial metatarsal views. Significant correlations (Spearman ρ) were also found for hallux valgus angle (p = 0.04) and DMAA (p = 0.01), and non-significant correlations were found for intermetatarsal angle and sesamoid position (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The significant correlations between hallux valgus angle and DMAA for RC suggest that RC is isolated from the first metatarsal bone structure. This practical assessment method may isolate the first metatarsal head RC regarding the proximal metatarsal in the metaphyseal region and could be useful in centers where weight-bearing CT scans are not available. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutic Studies; Case Series.","PeriodicalId":21602,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of the Foot & Ankle","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of the Foot & Ankle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30795/jfootankle.2020.v14.1196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Hallux valgus is a progressive triplanar deformity of the forefoot with an important rotational component (RC) in the first metatarsal, which has been associated with recurrence. There is controversy about using weight-bearing vs. non-weight-bearing radiographs in RC measurement. This study aims to assess interobserver reliability for RC of the first metatarsal using a non-weight-bearing sesamoid view, as well as to correlate the hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) and sesamoid position regarding RC. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional and descriptive study was conducted with 81 feet from 48 patients (66.6% female). RC was evaluated regarding the first metatarsal proximal shaft in non-weight-bearing axial metatarsal radiographs and weight-bearing anteroposterior radiographs. Measurements were taken independently by two foot and ankle subspecialists and an orthopedic resident, all of whom were blinded. Results: Statistically significant intraclass correlations (p = 0.02) were obtained for first metatarsal RC assessment among the three observers (95%CI 0.01–0.65; Cronbach’s α =0.41) in non-weight-bearing axial metatarsal views. Significant correlations (Spearman ρ) were also found for hallux valgus angle (p = 0.04) and DMAA (p = 0.01), and non-significant correlations were found for intermetatarsal angle and sesamoid position (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The significant correlations between hallux valgus angle and DMAA for RC suggest that RC is isolated from the first metatarsal bone structure. This practical assessment method may isolate the first metatarsal head RC regarding the proximal metatarsal in the metaphyseal region and could be useful in centers where weight-bearing CT scans are not available. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutic Studies; Case Series.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拇外翻轴向籽骨x线片第一跖骨旋转分量的观察者间可靠性
目的:拇外翻是一种进行性前足三面畸形,在第一跖骨有一个重要的旋转部件(RC),与复发有关。在RC测量中使用负重x线片与不负重x线片存在争议。本研究旨在利用非负重的籽骨视图评估第一跖骨RC的观察者间可靠性,并将拇外翻角、跖骨间角、跖骨远端关节角(DMAA)和籽骨位置与RC相关联。方法:对48例患者(66.6%为女性)的81脚进行观察性、横断面和描述性研究。在非负重跖骨轴位片和负重跖骨正位片上评估第一跖骨近端轴的RC。测量由两名足部和踝关节专科医生和一名骨科住院医师独立进行,他们都是盲法的。结果:三名观察者第一跖骨RC评估的组内相关性有统计学意义(p = 0.02) (95%CI 0.01-0.65;Cronbach’s α =0.41)。拇外翻角(p = 0.04)与DMAA (p = 0.01)也有显著相关(Spearman ρ),跖间角与籽骨位置无显著相关(p > 0.05)。结论:RC的拇外翻角与DMAA有显著相关性,提示RC与第一跖骨结构分离。这种实用的评估方法可以在干骺端的近端分离出第一跖骨头RC,并可用于无法获得负重CT扫描的中心。证据水平IV;治疗研究;病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hallux valgus: Patología tridimensional. Nuevo enfoque terapéutico Conservative treatment of hallux rigidus: narrative review of scientific evidence The SUPERankle procedure in the treatment of foot and ankle deformities in fibular hemimelia Hallux rigidus: clinical examination, radiology, and classification Arthroscopic treatment for posteromedial talar process fracture (Cedell fracture): a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1