Continuous monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in children using residual blood samples from routine clinical chemistry

Felix Wachter, A. Regensburger, Antonia Sophia Peter, F. Knieling, A. Wagner, David Simon, A. Hoerning, J. Woelfle, K. Überla, A. Neubert, M. Rauh
{"title":"Continuous monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in children using residual blood samples from routine clinical chemistry","authors":"Felix Wachter, A. Regensburger, Antonia Sophia Peter, F. Knieling, A. Wagner, David Simon, A. Hoerning, J. Woelfle, K. Überla, A. Neubert, M. Rauh","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2022-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives The assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children is still challenging, but essential for appropriate political decisions. The aim of this study was to investigate whether residual blood samples can be used for SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence monitoring in pediatrics. Methods In this repeated cross-sectional cohort study, anonymous residual blood samples from pediatric patients aged 0–17 years were collected in three time-periods (Oct.–Nov. 2020, April 2021, and June–July 2021) and analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein (anti-S) and nucleocapsid (anti-N) antibodies using commercial antibody assays. 28 reactive samples were used to compare antibody levels with a pseudotyped neutralization assay. The results were further compared to the official national COVID-19 surveillance data to calculate the number of unreported cases. Results In total, n=2,626 individual blood samples were analyzed. In this unvaccinated pediatric cohort anti-S and anti-N antibody seroprevalence increased over the three time periods (anti-S: 1.38–9.16%, and 14.59%; anti-N: 1.26%, to 6.19%, and 8.56%). Compared to the national surveillance data this leads to a 3.93–5.66-fold increase in the number of unreported cases. However, a correlation between the cumulative incidence of the individual provinces and our assigned data was found (r=0.74, p=0.0151). In addition, reactive samples with anti-S and anti-N and samples with only anti-S showed neutralization capabilities (11/14 and 8/14, respectively). Anti-S levels were not significantly different between age groups and sexes (all p>0.05). Conclusions The present study suggests that residual blood samples from routine laboratory chemistry could be included in the estimation of the total SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in children.","PeriodicalId":10388,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)","volume":"282 1","pages":"941 - 951"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children is still challenging, but essential for appropriate political decisions. The aim of this study was to investigate whether residual blood samples can be used for SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence monitoring in pediatrics. Methods In this repeated cross-sectional cohort study, anonymous residual blood samples from pediatric patients aged 0–17 years were collected in three time-periods (Oct.–Nov. 2020, April 2021, and June–July 2021) and analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein (anti-S) and nucleocapsid (anti-N) antibodies using commercial antibody assays. 28 reactive samples were used to compare antibody levels with a pseudotyped neutralization assay. The results were further compared to the official national COVID-19 surveillance data to calculate the number of unreported cases. Results In total, n=2,626 individual blood samples were analyzed. In this unvaccinated pediatric cohort anti-S and anti-N antibody seroprevalence increased over the three time periods (anti-S: 1.38–9.16%, and 14.59%; anti-N: 1.26%, to 6.19%, and 8.56%). Compared to the national surveillance data this leads to a 3.93–5.66-fold increase in the number of unreported cases. However, a correlation between the cumulative incidence of the individual provinces and our assigned data was found (r=0.74, p=0.0151). In addition, reactive samples with anti-S and anti-N and samples with only anti-S showed neutralization capabilities (11/14 and 8/14, respectively). Anti-S levels were not significantly different between age groups and sexes (all p>0.05). Conclusions The present study suggests that residual blood samples from routine laboratory chemistry could be included in the estimation of the total SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用常规临床化学残血样本持续监测儿童SARS-CoV-2血清阳性率
目的评估儿童SARS-CoV-2感染情况仍然具有挑战性,但对适当的政治决策至关重要。本研究的目的是探讨残血样本是否可用于儿科SARS-CoV-2血清阳性率监测。方法在这项重复横断面队列研究中,收集0-17岁儿童患者的匿名残血样本,时间为3个时间段(10月- 11月)。2020年、2021年4月和2021年6月至7月),并使用商业抗体测定法分析SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白(抗s)和核衣壳(抗n)抗体。28个反应性样品被用来比较抗体水平与假型中和试验。将结果进一步与官方国家COVID-19监测数据进行比较,以计算未报告病例数。结果共分析了n= 2626份个体血液样本。在这个未接种疫苗的儿童队列中,抗s和抗n抗体的血清阳性率在三个时间段内增加(抗s: 1.38-9.16%, 14.59%;anti-N分别为1.26%、6.19%和8.56%)。与国家监测数据相比,这导致未报告病例数量增加了3.93 - 5.66倍。然而,单个省份的累积发病率与我们分配的数据之间存在相关性(r=0.74, p=0.0151)。此外,含有抗s和抗n的活性样品和只含有抗s的活性样品表现出中和能力(分别为11/14和8/14)。抗s水平在不同年龄组和性别间无显著差异(p>0.05)。结论常规化验血残留样本可用于儿童SARS-CoV-2血清总阳性率的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Screening for sickle cell disease: focus on newborn investigations An automatic analysis and quality assurance method for lymphocyte subset identification Discriminating signal from noise: the biological variation of circulating calprotectin in serum and plasma Traumatic brain injury 43rd annual conference of the association of clinical biochemists in Ireland (ACBI 2021)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1