{"title":"Comparison and Prediction of Hyperthyroidism Accuracy Rate Using Novel Deep Learning Technology and Vivo Monitoring","authors":"K. Reddy, D. Rani","doi":"10.47059/alinteri/v36i1/ajas21098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this research work is to determine the presence of hyperthyroidism using modern algorithms, and comparing the accuracy rate between deep learning algorithms and vivo monitoring. Materials and methods: Data collection containing ultrasound images from kaggle's website was used in this research. Samples were considered as (N=23) for Deep learning algorithm and (N=23) for vivo monitoring in accordance to total sample size calculated using clinical.com. The accuracy was calculated by using DPLA with a standard data set. Results: Comparison of accuracy rate is done by independent sample test using SPSS software. There is a statistically indifference between Deep learning algorithm and in vivo monitoring. Deep learning algorithm (87.89%) showed better results in comparison to vivo monitoring (83.32%). Conclusion: Deep learning algorithms appear to give better accuracy than in vivo monitoring to predict hyperthyroidism.","PeriodicalId":42396,"journal":{"name":"Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47059/alinteri/v36i1/ajas21098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this research work is to determine the presence of hyperthyroidism using modern algorithms, and comparing the accuracy rate between deep learning algorithms and vivo monitoring. Materials and methods: Data collection containing ultrasound images from kaggle's website was used in this research. Samples were considered as (N=23) for Deep learning algorithm and (N=23) for vivo monitoring in accordance to total sample size calculated using clinical.com. The accuracy was calculated by using DPLA with a standard data set. Results: Comparison of accuracy rate is done by independent sample test using SPSS software. There is a statistically indifference between Deep learning algorithm and in vivo monitoring. Deep learning algorithm (87.89%) showed better results in comparison to vivo monitoring (83.32%). Conclusion: Deep learning algorithms appear to give better accuracy than in vivo monitoring to predict hyperthyroidism.