Practical Considerations in Choosing an Anchor Test Form for Equating Under the Random Groups Design

IF 0.6 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/15366367.2022.2087354
Zhongmin Cui, Yong He
{"title":"Practical Considerations in Choosing an Anchor Test Form for Equating Under the Random Groups Design","authors":"Zhongmin Cui, Yong He","doi":"10.1080/15366367.2022.2087354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Careful considerations are necessary when there is a need to choose an anchor test form from a list of old test forms for equating under the random groups design. The choice of the anchor form potentially affects the accuracy of equated scores on new test forms. Few guidelines, however, can be found in the literature on choosing the anchor form. Five indices were proposed in this study to aid the selection and their performances were evaluated through a real-data-based simulation. The results shed some light on how to choose an anchor form in practice.","PeriodicalId":46596,"journal":{"name":"Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2022.2087354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Careful considerations are necessary when there is a need to choose an anchor test form from a list of old test forms for equating under the random groups design. The choice of the anchor form potentially affects the accuracy of equated scores on new test forms. Few guidelines, however, can be found in the literature on choosing the anchor form. Five indices were proposed in this study to aid the selection and their performances were evaluated through a real-data-based simulation. The results shed some light on how to choose an anchor form in practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机群设计下方程锚点检验形式选择的实际考虑
在随机分组设计下,当需要从旧的测试表格列表中选择一个锚点测试表格时,需要仔细考虑。锚点表格的选择可能会影响新测试表格等效分数的准确性。然而,在选择锚点形式的文献中可以找到很少的指导方针。本研究提出了五个指标来辅助选择,并通过基于真实数据的模拟来评估它们的性能。研究结果对实践中如何选择锚形有一定的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives
Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
A Latent Trait Approach to the Measurement of Physical Fitness Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Fake News Classification The Use of Multidimensional Item Response Theory Estimations in Controlling Differential Item Functioning Opinion Instability and Measurement Errors: A G-Theory Analysis of College Students Predicting the Risk of Diabetes and Heart Disease with Machine Learning Classifiers: The Mediation Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1