Patient Safety Reporting and Implementation during the Pandemic Covid 19

Putu Sudarmika, Ni Nyoman Gunahariati, I. Sutajaya, I. B. Arnyana, Gede Sudirtha
{"title":"Patient Safety Reporting and Implementation during the Pandemic Covid 19","authors":"Putu Sudarmika, Ni Nyoman Gunahariati, I. Sutajaya, I. B. Arnyana, Gede Sudirtha","doi":"10.22038/PSJ.2021.58685.1333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:The goal of this research was to determine the recording and implementation of patient safety during a pandemic.Materials and Methods: This study was conducted through in 2 phases. In the first phase, the design used is pre and post-design. The researchers analyzed patient safety reports from each treatment room. The data collected retrospectively were patient safety data in the patient safety recording 2019 and data in the 2020 report. The second part consisted of conducting structured interviews through focus group discussions held in two sessions, with five respondents in each session.Results: A total of 33 patient care units were included in this study. There were differences in the recording and reporting of patient safety before the pandemic and during the pandemic (P=0.001), there were differences in the implementation of patient identification (P= 0.026), there was a difference in effective communication (P= 0.040), while drug alertness was not significantly different (P= 0.970); there was a difference in the accuracy of surgical procedures (P= 0.016), there was a difference in infection prevention (P= 0.011), and prevention of falling risk (P= 0.001).Conclusion:There was a decrease in the number of recordings and reporting on patient safety because officers serving patients are more focused on the condition of patients with Covid-19. Nurses are faced with a new disease that raises concerns about transmission and the use of complete PPE so that voices are not heard. Recommendations for using research results as learning materials in policymaking.","PeriodicalId":16681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement","volume":"39 1","pages":"141-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/PSJ.2021.58685.1333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction:The goal of this research was to determine the recording and implementation of patient safety during a pandemic.Materials and Methods: This study was conducted through in 2 phases. In the first phase, the design used is pre and post-design. The researchers analyzed patient safety reports from each treatment room. The data collected retrospectively were patient safety data in the patient safety recording 2019 and data in the 2020 report. The second part consisted of conducting structured interviews through focus group discussions held in two sessions, with five respondents in each session.Results: A total of 33 patient care units were included in this study. There were differences in the recording and reporting of patient safety before the pandemic and during the pandemic (P=0.001), there were differences in the implementation of patient identification (P= 0.026), there was a difference in effective communication (P= 0.040), while drug alertness was not significantly different (P= 0.970); there was a difference in the accuracy of surgical procedures (P= 0.016), there was a difference in infection prevention (P= 0.011), and prevention of falling risk (P= 0.001).Conclusion:There was a decrease in the number of recordings and reporting on patient safety because officers serving patients are more focused on the condition of patients with Covid-19. Nurses are faced with a new disease that raises concerns about transmission and the use of complete PPE so that voices are not heard. Recommendations for using research results as learning materials in policymaking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covid - 19大流行期间患者安全报告和实施
本研究的目的是确定大流行期间患者安全的记录和实施。材料与方法:本研究分为两期进行。在第一阶段,使用的设计是前期设计和后期设计。研究人员分析了每个治疗室的患者安全报告。回顾性收集的数据为2019年患者安全记录中的患者安全数据和2020年报告中的数据。第二部分是通过两届会议的焦点小组讨论进行有组织的访谈,每届会议有五名答复者。结果:本研究共纳入33个病人护理单位。大流行前和大流行期间患者安全记录和报告存在差异(P=0.001),患者识别执行存在差异(P= 0.026),有效沟通存在差异(P= 0.040),而药物警惕性差异无统计学意义(P= 0.970);在手术操作的准确性(P= 0.016)、预防感染(P= 0.011)和预防跌倒风险(P= 0.001)方面存在差异。结论:由于为患者服务的官员更关注Covid-19患者的病情,因此患者安全记录和报告的数量有所减少。护士面临着一种新的疾病,这种疾病引起了人们对传播和使用全套个人防护装备的担忧,因此无法听到他们的声音。建议使用研究成果作为决策的学习材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnosis of Lophomonas blattarum in bronchoalveolar lavage samples comparison of Social adjustment, school satisfaction and mental health in girls with and without precocious puberty A Critical Analysis Study of Pharmacological and Clinical Information Provided in Drug Package Inserts Based on Drugs and Cosmetics Rules Guidelines Evaluation of the Frequency of Stimulant and Opioid Abuse in the Poisoned Cases Referred To Hospitals in Ardabil, Iran Comparing Symptoms of Anxiety Disorders and Related Transdiagnostic Factors in Cancer Patients and Healthy Individuals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1