Factors Contributing to Increased Patient Wait Times in Selected Wound Care Patients: A Retrospective Study

J. Ade-Oshifogun, J. Aina
{"title":"Factors Contributing to Increased Patient Wait Times in Selected Wound Care Patients: A Retrospective Study","authors":"J. Ade-Oshifogun, J. Aina","doi":"10.20849/IJSN.V3I2.383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: ‘Waiting’ can be frustrating for anyone especially when it comes to healthcare. The Institute of Medicine advocates changes to improve the quality of the health care delivery system in the United States. Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the factors contributing to increased patient wait times in selected wound care patients. The question guiding this project is-in selected wound care patients who received treatment between September1-December 31, 2013; are factors contributing to prolonged wait times related to treatment-related diagnosis, providers, and clinicians? Method: After institutional review board approval, retrospective charts review was conducted. 300 charts were randomly selected from the electronic health record (EHR) database at a local hospital wound care clinic. 120 charts met the inclusive criteria and were analyzed using ANOVA and SPSS version 22. The Deming cycle for quality improvement was adopted as the framework for practice review and changes. Result: Among all the factors examined, Treatment diagnosis accounted for 4% of the variance (p = 0.416); Providers 1% (p = 0.208); and Clinicians 8% (p = 0.195). Though clinicians had the highest variance, it was not a significant factor for patient wait times. The Deming cycle helps to prioritize and improve communication by creating a chart for effective patient flow through the clinic to reduce wait time. Conclusion: Correcting and improving wait times has the potential for increasing timely access and patient satisfaction. Clinicians and providers are not significant factors contributing to wait times. Wait time should be given priority and be regularly reviewed as part of the quality improvement plan within any organization.","PeriodicalId":39544,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Security and Networks","volume":"1 1","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Security and Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20849/IJSN.V3I2.383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: ‘Waiting’ can be frustrating for anyone especially when it comes to healthcare. The Institute of Medicine advocates changes to improve the quality of the health care delivery system in the United States. Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the factors contributing to increased patient wait times in selected wound care patients. The question guiding this project is-in selected wound care patients who received treatment between September1-December 31, 2013; are factors contributing to prolonged wait times related to treatment-related diagnosis, providers, and clinicians? Method: After institutional review board approval, retrospective charts review was conducted. 300 charts were randomly selected from the electronic health record (EHR) database at a local hospital wound care clinic. 120 charts met the inclusive criteria and were analyzed using ANOVA and SPSS version 22. The Deming cycle for quality improvement was adopted as the framework for practice review and changes. Result: Among all the factors examined, Treatment diagnosis accounted for 4% of the variance (p = 0.416); Providers 1% (p = 0.208); and Clinicians 8% (p = 0.195). Though clinicians had the highest variance, it was not a significant factor for patient wait times. The Deming cycle helps to prioritize and improve communication by creating a chart for effective patient flow through the clinic to reduce wait time. Conclusion: Correcting and improving wait times has the potential for increasing timely access and patient satisfaction. Clinicians and providers are not significant factors contributing to wait times. Wait time should be given priority and be regularly reviewed as part of the quality improvement plan within any organization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在选定的伤口护理患者中导致患者等待时间增加的因素:一项回顾性研究
背景:“等待”对任何人来说都是令人沮丧的,尤其是在医疗保健方面。医学研究所提倡改变,以提高美国医疗保健服务系统的质量。目的:本回顾性研究的目的是确定在选定的伤口护理患者中导致患者等待时间增加的因素。本课题的指导问题是:选取2013年9月1日至12月31日期间接受治疗的伤口护理患者;导致等待时间延长的因素是否与治疗相关的诊断、提供者和临床医生有关?方法:经机构审查委员会批准后,进行回顾性图表审查。从当地一家医院伤口护理诊所的电子健康记录(EHR)数据库中随机选择300张图表。120张图表符合纳入标准,采用方差分析和SPSS版本22进行分析。采用戴明质量改进周期作为实践审查和变更的框架。结果:在所有检查的因素中,治疗诊断占方差的4% (p = 0.416);提供者1% (p = 0.208);临床医生8% (p = 0.195)。尽管临床医生的差异最大,但这并不是患者等待时间的重要因素。戴明循环通过创建一个有效的患者通过诊所的流程图来减少等待时间,从而帮助确定优先级并改善沟通。结论:纠正和改善等待时间有可能增加及时就诊和患者满意度。临床医生和提供者不是导致等待时间的重要因素。任何组织都应优先考虑等待时间,并将其作为质量改进计划的一部分进行定期评审。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Security and Networks
International Journal of Security and Networks Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: IJSN proposes and fosters discussion on and dissemination of network security related issues.
期刊最新文献
An Overview of Location Privacy Protection in Spatial Crowdsourcing Platforms During the Task Assignment Process Moving Object Location Prediction Based on a Graph Neural Network with Temporal Attention A Detailed Analysis of Public Industrial Control System Datasets Multi Group Key Agreement Protocol Using Secret Sharing Scheme A Security Control Scheme Based on Quantum Keys for IoT Terminals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1