H. Olierook, K. Rankenburg, S. Ulrich, C. Kirkland, N. Evans, Stephen Brown, B. McInnes, A. Prent, J. Gillespie, B. McDonald, Miles Darragh
{"title":"Resolving multiple geological events using in situ Rb–Sr geochronology: implications for metallogenesis at Tropicana, Western Australia","authors":"H. Olierook, K. Rankenburg, S. Ulrich, C. Kirkland, N. Evans, Stephen Brown, B. McInnes, A. Prent, J. Gillespie, B. McDonald, Miles Darragh","doi":"10.5194/GCHRON-2-283-2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Dating multiple geological events in single samples using\nthermochronology and geochronology is relatively common, but it is only with\nthe recent advent of triple quadrupole laser ablation inductively coupled\nplasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) that in situ rubidium–strontium (Rb–Sr) dating has\nbecome a more commonly applied and powerful tool to date K-rich or\nRb-bearing minerals. Here, we date two generations of mineral assemblages in\nindividual thin sections using the in situ Rb–Sr method. Two distinct mineral\nassemblages, both probably associated with Au mineralization, are identified\nin samples from the Tropicana gold mine in the Albany–Fraser Orogen,\nWestern Australia. For Rb–Sr purposes, the key dateable minerals are two\ngenerations of biotite as well as additional phengite associated with the younger\nassemblage. Our results reveal that the first, coarse-grained generation of\nbiotite grains records a minimum age of 2535±18 Ma, coeval with\nprevious 40Ar∕39Ar biotite, rhenium–osmium (Re–Os) pyrite and uranium–lead (U–Pb) rutile results.\nThe second, fine-grained and recrystallized generation of biotite grains\nrecord an age of 1207±12 Ma across all samples. Phengite and\nmuscovite yielded broadly similar results at ca. 1.2 Ga, but data are\noverdispersed for a single coeval population of phengite and show elevated\nage uncertainties for muscovite. We propose that the ca. 2530 Ma age\nrecorded by various geochronometers represents cooling and exhumation and\nthat the age of ca. 1210 Ma is related to major shearing associated with the\nregional deformation as part of Stage II of the Albany–Fraser Orogeny.\nThis is the first time that an age of ca. 1210 Ma has been identified in the\nTropicana Zone, which may have ramifications for constraining the timing of\nmineralization in the region. The in situ Rb–Sr technique is currently the only\ntool capable of resolving both geological events in these rocks.\n","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/GCHRON-2-283-2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
Abstract. Dating multiple geological events in single samples using
thermochronology and geochronology is relatively common, but it is only with
the recent advent of triple quadrupole laser ablation inductively coupled
plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) that in situ rubidium–strontium (Rb–Sr) dating has
become a more commonly applied and powerful tool to date K-rich or
Rb-bearing minerals. Here, we date two generations of mineral assemblages in
individual thin sections using the in situ Rb–Sr method. Two distinct mineral
assemblages, both probably associated with Au mineralization, are identified
in samples from the Tropicana gold mine in the Albany–Fraser Orogen,
Western Australia. For Rb–Sr purposes, the key dateable minerals are two
generations of biotite as well as additional phengite associated with the younger
assemblage. Our results reveal that the first, coarse-grained generation of
biotite grains records a minimum age of 2535±18 Ma, coeval with
previous 40Ar∕39Ar biotite, rhenium–osmium (Re–Os) pyrite and uranium–lead (U–Pb) rutile results.
The second, fine-grained and recrystallized generation of biotite grains
record an age of 1207±12 Ma across all samples. Phengite and
muscovite yielded broadly similar results at ca. 1.2 Ga, but data are
overdispersed for a single coeval population of phengite and show elevated
age uncertainties for muscovite. We propose that the ca. 2530 Ma age
recorded by various geochronometers represents cooling and exhumation and
that the age of ca. 1210 Ma is related to major shearing associated with the
regional deformation as part of Stage II of the Albany–Fraser Orogeny.
This is the first time that an age of ca. 1210 Ma has been identified in the
Tropicana Zone, which may have ramifications for constraining the timing of
mineralization in the region. The in situ Rb–Sr technique is currently the only
tool capable of resolving both geological events in these rocks.