Gait Training Interventions for Lower Extremity Amputees: A Systematic Literature Review.

IF 0.7 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Technology and Innovation Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI:10.21300/18.2-3.2016.99
M. J. Highsmith, Casey R Andrews, Claire Millman, Ashley Fuller, Jason T. Kahle, Tyler D. Klenow, Katherine L Lewis, Rachel C Bradley, John J Orriola
{"title":"Gait Training Interventions for Lower Extremity Amputees: A Systematic Literature Review.","authors":"M. J. Highsmith, Casey R Andrews, Claire Millman, Ashley Fuller, Jason T. Kahle, Tyler D. Klenow, Katherine L Lewis, Rachel C Bradley, John J Orriola","doi":"10.21300/18.2-3.2016.99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lower extremity (LE) amputation patients who use prostheses have gait asymmetries and altered limb loading and movement strategies when ambulating. Subsequent secondary conditions are believed to be associated with gait deviations and lead to long-term complications that impact function and quality of life as a result. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to determine the strength of evidence supporting gait training interventions and to formulate evidence statements to guide practice and research related to therapeutic gait training for lower extremity amputees. A systematic review of three databases was conducted followed by evaluation of evidence and synthesis of empirical evidence statements (EES). Eighteen manuscripts were included in the review, which covered two areas of gait training interventions: 1) overground and 2) treadmill-based. Eight EESs were synthesized. Four addressed overground gait training, one covered treadmill training, and three statements addressed both forms of therapy. Due to the gait asymmetries, altered biomechanics, and related secondary consequences associated with LE amputation, gait training interventions are needed along with study of their efficacy. Overground training with verbal or other auditory, manual, and psychological awareness interventions was found to be effective at improving gait. Similarly, treadmill-based training was found to be effective: 1) as a supplement to overground training; 2) independently when augmented with visual feedback and/or body weight support; or 3) as part of a home exercise plan. Gait training approaches studied improved multiple areas of gait, including sagittal and coronal biomechanics, spatiotemporal measures, and distance walked.","PeriodicalId":44009,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Innovation","volume":"53 1","pages":"99-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21300/18.2-3.2016.99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

Abstract

Lower extremity (LE) amputation patients who use prostheses have gait asymmetries and altered limb loading and movement strategies when ambulating. Subsequent secondary conditions are believed to be associated with gait deviations and lead to long-term complications that impact function and quality of life as a result. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to determine the strength of evidence supporting gait training interventions and to formulate evidence statements to guide practice and research related to therapeutic gait training for lower extremity amputees. A systematic review of three databases was conducted followed by evaluation of evidence and synthesis of empirical evidence statements (EES). Eighteen manuscripts were included in the review, which covered two areas of gait training interventions: 1) overground and 2) treadmill-based. Eight EESs were synthesized. Four addressed overground gait training, one covered treadmill training, and three statements addressed both forms of therapy. Due to the gait asymmetries, altered biomechanics, and related secondary consequences associated with LE amputation, gait training interventions are needed along with study of their efficacy. Overground training with verbal or other auditory, manual, and psychological awareness interventions was found to be effective at improving gait. Similarly, treadmill-based training was found to be effective: 1) as a supplement to overground training; 2) independently when augmented with visual feedback and/or body weight support; or 3) as part of a home exercise plan. Gait training approaches studied improved multiple areas of gait, including sagittal and coronal biomechanics, spatiotemporal measures, and distance walked.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
步态训练干预下肢截肢者:系统的文献综述。
下肢(LE)截肢患者使用假肢时步态不对称,肢体负荷和运动策略改变。随后的继发性疾病被认为与步态偏差有关,并导致影响功能和生活质量的长期并发症。本研究的目的是系统地回顾文献,以确定支持步态训练干预的证据强度,并制定证据陈述,以指导与下肢截肢者治疗性步态训练相关的实践和研究。对三个数据库进行了系统回顾,随后进行了证据评估和经验证据陈述(EES)的合成。这篇综述收录了18篇手稿,涵盖了步态训练干预的两个领域:1)地面训练和2)基于跑步机的训练。合成了8个EESs。四项涉及地面步态训练,一项涉及跑步机训练,三项涉及两种形式的治疗。由于步态不对称、生物力学改变以及与左下肢截肢相关的继发性后果,需要进行步态训练干预并研究其疗效。口头或其他听觉、手动和心理意识干预的地面训练被发现对改善步态是有效的。同样,基于跑步机的训练被发现是有效的:1)作为地上训练的补充;2)在视觉反馈和/或体重支持下独立;或者3)作为家庭锻炼计划的一部分。步态训练方法研究了步态的多个领域,包括矢状面和冠状面生物力学、时空测量和步行距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Innovation
Technology and Innovation MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
VA TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM RESPONDS TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC. TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER ASSISTANCE PROJECT BRINGS VA HEALTH CARE IDEAS TO LIFE. On Capital, Innovation, and Government Innovative Infrared Heating Technologies for Food and Agricultural Processing Journeys of Innovation: Positively Connected
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1