Change in reflections of physiotherapy students over time in clinical placements

J. Wessel, H. Larin
{"title":"Change in reflections of physiotherapy students over time in clinical placements","authors":"J. Wessel, H. Larin","doi":"10.1111/J.1473-6861.2006.00124.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physiotherapy programmes are expected to develop reflective practitioners. Research has indicated that the reflections of senior students and clinicians are different from students beginning their clinical experience. However, most of these studies are cross-sectional in nature. The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe the changes in the reflections of a group of physiotherapy students from their first to their third clinical placements. Subjects were 15 female students (mean age: 20.1 years) in an undergraduate physiotherapy programme in the United Arab Emirates. They wrote weekly entries in a journal during their first and third clinical placements. They described an event, their reaction to it and how it might affect their future behaviour. Two evaluators independently read and coded the content of all journals, and then worked together to categorize the data, rate the level of reflection of each weekly entry and develop themes. The levels of reflection and the themes from the two time periods were compared. Quotes from individual students from both time periods illustrated the changes in reflections. Students’ highest level of reflection for each entry ranged from level 1 (only described the event) to level 4 (gained a new understanding), with a slightly higher mean level of reflection during the third clinical placement. Themes derived from the journals were Professional behaviour, Learning, Self-development, and Ethical issues, in the first placement, and Communication, Ethics, Learning, and Scope of practice, in the third placement. In the latter placement, students were more confident and more focused on the client compared with their first placement. Although the overall themes were somewhat similar in the first and third clinical placements, students broadened their perception of the roles and responsibilities of physiotherapists and of the ultimate impact of their actions on the patient.","PeriodicalId":100874,"journal":{"name":"Learning in Health and Social Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning in Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1473-6861.2006.00124.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

Physiotherapy programmes are expected to develop reflective practitioners. Research has indicated that the reflections of senior students and clinicians are different from students beginning their clinical experience. However, most of these studies are cross-sectional in nature. The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe the changes in the reflections of a group of physiotherapy students from their first to their third clinical placements. Subjects were 15 female students (mean age: 20.1 years) in an undergraduate physiotherapy programme in the United Arab Emirates. They wrote weekly entries in a journal during their first and third clinical placements. They described an event, their reaction to it and how it might affect their future behaviour. Two evaluators independently read and coded the content of all journals, and then worked together to categorize the data, rate the level of reflection of each weekly entry and develop themes. The levels of reflection and the themes from the two time periods were compared. Quotes from individual students from both time periods illustrated the changes in reflections. Students’ highest level of reflection for each entry ranged from level 1 (only described the event) to level 4 (gained a new understanding), with a slightly higher mean level of reflection during the third clinical placement. Themes derived from the journals were Professional behaviour, Learning, Self-development, and Ethical issues, in the first placement, and Communication, Ethics, Learning, and Scope of practice, in the third placement. In the latter placement, students were more confident and more focused on the client compared with their first placement. Although the overall themes were somewhat similar in the first and third clinical placements, students broadened their perception of the roles and responsibilities of physiotherapists and of the ultimate impact of their actions on the patient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理治疗学生在临床实习期间反映的变化
物理治疗课程有望培养反思的从业人员。研究表明,高年级学生和临床医生的反思与刚开始临床经验的学生不同。然而,这些研究大多是横向的。本定性研究的目的是描述一组物理治疗学生从第一次到第三次临床实习的反映变化。研究对象为阿拉伯联合酋长国本科物理治疗项目的15名女学生(平均年龄:20.1岁)。在第一次和第三次临床实习期间,他们每周都会写日记。他们描述了一个事件,他们对它的反应,以及它如何影响他们未来的行为。两名评估员独立阅读和编码所有期刊的内容,然后共同对数据进行分类,对每周条目的反映水平进行评级,并制定主题。比较了两个时期的反思水平和主题。来自两个时期的个别学生的引用说明了反思的变化。学生对每个条目的最高反思水平从1级(仅描述事件)到4级(获得新的理解)不等,在第三次临床实习期间,学生的平均反思水平略高。来自期刊的主题是专业行为、学习、自我发展和道德问题,排在第一,沟通、道德、学习和实践范围,排在第三。与第一次实习相比,后一次实习的学生更自信,更专注于客户。尽管在第一次和第三次临床实习中,总体主题有些相似,但学生们拓宽了对物理治疗师的角色和责任以及他们的行为对患者的最终影响的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experiential placements and scaffolding for reflection A qualitative evaluation of an interprofessional learning project Becoming a lecturer in nurse education: the work-place learning of clinical experts as newcomers Lost in translation: barriers to learning in health professional clinical education Undergraduate socialization in medical education: ideals of professional physicians’ practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1