Cardiac resynchronization: a novel therapy for heart failure.

K.-l. Wong, D. Kocovic, E. Loh
{"title":"Cardiac resynchronization: a novel therapy for heart failure.","authors":"K.-l. Wong, D. Kocovic, E. Loh","doi":"10.1111/J.1527-5299.2001.00242.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite advances in medical therapy for patients with congestive heart failure, morbidity and mortality remain high. Conduction abnormalities, such as left bundle branch block, right bundle branch block, and nonspecific conduction delay, are observed commonly in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. In patients with heart failure, the presence of intraventricular conduction delay is associated with more severe mitral regurgitation and worsened left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, and is an independent risk factor for increased mortality. Conventional dual-chamber (right atrial and right ventricular) pacing with a short atrioventricular delay was initially introduced as therapy for patients with advanced congestive heart failure to improve diastolic dysfunction and reduce mitral regurgitation. The acute beneficial hemodynamic effects observed in early, uncontrolled studies were not confirmed in subsequent randomized, controlled studies with longer follow-up. Cardiac resynchronization with novel biventricular (left and right ventricular) pacing systems has resulted in hemodynamic and functional benefits in patients with congestive heart failure and an underlying intraventricular conduction delay. Improvements in cardiac index, systolic blood pressure, and functional class have been reported with biventricular pacing, both acutely and at more than 1 year of follow-up. These encouraging preliminary results with biventricular pacing in patients with congestive heart failure will be validated in two prospective, randomized, controlled trials, Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE) and Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Chronic Heart Failure (COMPANION). These studies are designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of biventricular pacing in improving exercise capacity and in reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced, symptomatic congestive heart failure. (c)2001 by CHF, Inc.","PeriodicalId":10536,"journal":{"name":"Congestive heart failure","volume":"16 1 1","pages":"139-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congestive heart failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1527-5299.2001.00242.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Despite advances in medical therapy for patients with congestive heart failure, morbidity and mortality remain high. Conduction abnormalities, such as left bundle branch block, right bundle branch block, and nonspecific conduction delay, are observed commonly in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. In patients with heart failure, the presence of intraventricular conduction delay is associated with more severe mitral regurgitation and worsened left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, and is an independent risk factor for increased mortality. Conventional dual-chamber (right atrial and right ventricular) pacing with a short atrioventricular delay was initially introduced as therapy for patients with advanced congestive heart failure to improve diastolic dysfunction and reduce mitral regurgitation. The acute beneficial hemodynamic effects observed in early, uncontrolled studies were not confirmed in subsequent randomized, controlled studies with longer follow-up. Cardiac resynchronization with novel biventricular (left and right ventricular) pacing systems has resulted in hemodynamic and functional benefits in patients with congestive heart failure and an underlying intraventricular conduction delay. Improvements in cardiac index, systolic blood pressure, and functional class have been reported with biventricular pacing, both acutely and at more than 1 year of follow-up. These encouraging preliminary results with biventricular pacing in patients with congestive heart failure will be validated in two prospective, randomized, controlled trials, Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE) and Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Chronic Heart Failure (COMPANION). These studies are designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of biventricular pacing in improving exercise capacity and in reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced, symptomatic congestive heart failure. (c)2001 by CHF, Inc.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏再同步化:心力衰竭的新疗法。
尽管对充血性心力衰竭患者的医学治疗取得了进展,但发病率和死亡率仍然很高。传导异常,如左束支阻滞、右束支阻滞和非特异性传导延迟,常见于扩张型心肌病患者。在心力衰竭患者中,室内传导延迟的存在与更严重的二尖瓣反流和左心室收缩和舒张功能恶化相关,并且是死亡率增加的独立危险因素。传统的双室(右心房和右心室)起搏与短房室延迟最初被引入治疗晚期充血性心力衰竭患者,以改善舒张功能障碍和减少二尖瓣反流。早期非对照研究中观察到的急性有益血流动力学效应在随后的长期随访的随机对照研究中未得到证实。心脏再同步与新型双心室(左和右心室)起搏系统导致充血性心力衰竭和潜在的室内传导延迟患者的血液动力学和功能益处。双心室起搏在心脏指数、收缩压和功能分级方面均有改善的报道,无论是在急性期还是在超过1年的随访中。充血性心力衰竭患者双心室起搏的这些令人鼓舞的初步结果将在两项前瞻性、随机、对照试验中得到验证,多中心InSync随机临床评估(MIRACLE)和慢性心力衰竭药物治疗、起搏和除颤的比较(COMPANION)。这些研究旨在评估双心室起搏在改善晚期有症状的充血性心力衰竭患者的运动能力和降低发病率和死亡率方面的长期疗效。(c)2001年,CHF, Inc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Hospital Mortality With Intra‐Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation Insertion Before vs After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Increased Mortality Associated With Low Use of Clopidogrel in Patients With Heart Failure and Acute Myocardial Infarction Not Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Heart Failure: Current Clinical Understanding Pathophysiology of volume overload in acute heart failure syndromes Dynamic Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Elderly People
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1