SOVIET UKRAINE PHILOSOPHY OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 20th CENTURY IN THE ASSESSMENTS OF WESTERN PHILOSOPHERS OF THE TIME: IMAGE OF THE KYIV PHILOSOPHICAL SCHOOL OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 1960S – 1980S
{"title":"SOVIET UKRAINE PHILOSOPHY OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 20th CENTURY IN THE ASSESSMENTS OF WESTERN PHILOSOPHERS OF THE TIME: IMAGE OF THE KYIV PHILOSOPHICAL SCHOOL OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 1960S – 1980S","authors":"H. Vdovychenko","doi":"10.17721/2523-4064.2023/8-3/8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article continues to study the topic of the uprising of the image of the Kyiv philosophical school as a prominent leading Ukrainian participant in the world philosophical process of the Cold War period in the scientific and socio-political thought of the Western block, especially in the USA, Canada and Western Germany, in the second half of the twentieth century. The history of the formation of this image by scholars of the democratic world, mainly from the Ukrainian diaspora, can be conditionally divided into the following stages: 1. Scientific international interaction between the USSR and the Western bloc during the transition of the USSR from Khrushchew's \"thaw\" to neo-Stalinist \"stagnation\" (early 1960s – early 1970s); 2. Intensification of the ideological confrontation between the USSR and the Western bloc countries during transition of the USSR from said \"stagnation\" to Gorbachev's \"perestroika\" (early1970s – second half of the 1980s). In contrast to the first separate critical assessments by diaspora philosophers P. Fedenko, D. Soloviy and their colleagues of philosophy in the Ukrainian SSR in the 1950s and early 1960s, primarily articles of T. Shevcenko by the director of the Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR D. Ostryanin (1952 – 1962), the image of the Kyiv philosophical school in the 1970s and 1980s was significantly emphasized abroad. The political aspect of this image, dominant in which became, primarily due to its popularization by the Canadian philosopher T. Zakydalsky, the figure of a prisoner of conscience V. Lisovyi, was supplemented in the same and subsequent decades by the scientific aspect. In the memoirs of the Soviet prisoner of conscience and political immigrant L. Plyushch and in the publications of scientists from the US M. H. Teeter and B. Vitvitsky the image of the said school was generally drawn on the basis of their study of the history of the mentioned institute and the directions of its work in the 1940s – 1970s. At the same time, philosophers of the Ukrainian diaspora K. Mytrovych, W. Oleksiuk, W. Shayan and some their colleagues critically assessed the Ukrainian historical and philosophical achievements of this institute in the 1950s and 1980s.","PeriodicalId":33822,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Kiivs''kij nacional''nij universitet imeni Tarasa Sevcenka Istoria","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Kiivs''kij nacional''nij universitet imeni Tarasa Sevcenka Istoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2023/8-3/8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article continues to study the topic of the uprising of the image of the Kyiv philosophical school as a prominent leading Ukrainian participant in the world philosophical process of the Cold War period in the scientific and socio-political thought of the Western block, especially in the USA, Canada and Western Germany, in the second half of the twentieth century. The history of the formation of this image by scholars of the democratic world, mainly from the Ukrainian diaspora, can be conditionally divided into the following stages: 1. Scientific international interaction between the USSR and the Western bloc during the transition of the USSR from Khrushchew's "thaw" to neo-Stalinist "stagnation" (early 1960s – early 1970s); 2. Intensification of the ideological confrontation between the USSR and the Western bloc countries during transition of the USSR from said "stagnation" to Gorbachev's "perestroika" (early1970s – second half of the 1980s). In contrast to the first separate critical assessments by diaspora philosophers P. Fedenko, D. Soloviy and their colleagues of philosophy in the Ukrainian SSR in the 1950s and early 1960s, primarily articles of T. Shevcenko by the director of the Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR D. Ostryanin (1952 – 1962), the image of the Kyiv philosophical school in the 1970s and 1980s was significantly emphasized abroad. The political aspect of this image, dominant in which became, primarily due to its popularization by the Canadian philosopher T. Zakydalsky, the figure of a prisoner of conscience V. Lisovyi, was supplemented in the same and subsequent decades by the scientific aspect. In the memoirs of the Soviet prisoner of conscience and political immigrant L. Plyushch and in the publications of scientists from the US M. H. Teeter and B. Vitvitsky the image of the said school was generally drawn on the basis of their study of the history of the mentioned institute and the directions of its work in the 1940s – 1970s. At the same time, philosophers of the Ukrainian diaspora K. Mytrovych, W. Oleksiuk, W. Shayan and some their colleagues critically assessed the Ukrainian historical and philosophical achievements of this institute in the 1950s and 1980s.
本文继续研究基辅哲学学派在20世纪下半叶西方集团,特别是美国、加拿大和西德的科学和社会政治思想中,作为冷战时期世界哲学进程中杰出的乌克兰领导参与者的形象的崛起。民主世界的学者(主要来自乌克兰侨民)形成这一形象的历史,可以有条件地分为以下几个阶段:在苏联从赫鲁晓夫的“解冻”到新斯大林主义的“停滞”过渡期间(20世纪60年代初至70年代初),苏联与西方集团之间的科学国际互动;2. 在苏联从所谓的“停滞”过渡到戈尔巴乔夫的“改革”(20世纪70年代初至80年代后半期)期间,苏联与西方集团国家之间的意识形态对抗加剧。与20世纪50年代和60年代初乌克兰苏维埃社会主义共和国的离散哲学家P. Fedenko, D. Soloviy和他们的哲学同事的第一次独立的批判性评估相反,主要是乌克兰苏维埃社会主义共和国科学院哲学研究所所长T. shevchenko的文章D. Ostryanin(1952 - 1962),基辅哲学学派在20世纪70年代和80年代的形象在国外得到了极大的强调。这一形象的政治方面占主导地位,主要是由于加拿大哲学家t·扎基达尔斯基(T. Zakydalsky)将其推广为良心犯v·利索维(V. Lisovyi)的形象,在同一时期和随后的几十年里,科学方面补充了这一形象。在苏联良心犯和政治移民L. Plyushch的回忆录中,以及美国科学家M. H. Teeter和B. Vitvitsky的出版物中,上述学派的形象通常是根据他们对上述研究所的历史及其在20世纪40年代至70年代的工作方向的研究而绘制的。与此同时,乌克兰流散哲学家K. Mytrovych, W. Oleksiuk, W. Shayan和他们的一些同事批判性地评估了该研究所在20世纪50年代和80年代的乌克兰历史和哲学成就。