Configuring more responsible knowledge-based bio-economies: the case of alternative agro-food networks

IF 3.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Journal of Responsible Innovation Pub Date : 2023-04-27 DOI:10.1080/23299460.2023.2196818
K. Psarikidou
{"title":"Configuring more responsible knowledge-based bio-economies: the case of alternative agro-food networks","authors":"K. Psarikidou","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2023.2196818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ‘ knowledge-based bio-economy ’ (KBBE) constitutes a prominent research and innovation policy narrative underlining the centrality of knowledge and innovation as important products and resources driving contemporary economies and societies. However, a narrow understanding of the KBBE prevails, resulting in the exclusion of a wider diversity of stakeholders and knowledges that could lead to the production of more responsible research and innovation (RRI). This paper aims to contribute to con fi guring more responsible knowledge-based bio-economies, by exploring the potential of other economic developments, such as this of alternative agro-food networks (AAFNs) to constitute knowledge-based bio-economies. Drawing on research conducted in the Northwest England, this paper unpacks the diversity of knowledges and knowledge production processes within AAFNs, arguing for their potential to constitute an alternative, more responsible KBBE. In doing so, it encourages consideration of the centrality of knowledge inclusion and re fl exivity in con fi guring more responsible research and innovation processes for agriculture and food.","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2196818","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ‘ knowledge-based bio-economy ’ (KBBE) constitutes a prominent research and innovation policy narrative underlining the centrality of knowledge and innovation as important products and resources driving contemporary economies and societies. However, a narrow understanding of the KBBE prevails, resulting in the exclusion of a wider diversity of stakeholders and knowledges that could lead to the production of more responsible research and innovation (RRI). This paper aims to contribute to con fi guring more responsible knowledge-based bio-economies, by exploring the potential of other economic developments, such as this of alternative agro-food networks (AAFNs) to constitute knowledge-based bio-economies. Drawing on research conducted in the Northwest England, this paper unpacks the diversity of knowledges and knowledge production processes within AAFNs, arguing for their potential to constitute an alternative, more responsible KBBE. In doing so, it encourages consideration of the centrality of knowledge inclusion and re fl exivity in con fi guring more responsible research and innovation processes for agriculture and food.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
配置更负责任的以知识为基础的生物经济:以替代农业粮食网络为例
“以知识为基础的生物经济”(KBBE)构成了一个突出的研究和创新政策叙事,强调了知识和创新作为推动当代经济和社会的重要产品和资源的中心地位。然而,普遍存在对KBBE的狭隘理解,导致排除了更广泛的利益相关者和知识多样性,而这些利益相关者和知识可能导致更负责任的研究与创新(RRI)的产生。本文旨在通过探索其他经济发展的潜力,例如替代农业食品网络(aafn),为构建更负责任的知识生物经济做出贡献。根据在英格兰西北部进行的研究,本文揭示了AAFNs内部知识和知识生产过程的多样性,认为它们有可能构成另一种更负责任的KBBE。在这样做的过程中,它鼓励考虑在制定更负责任的农业和粮食研究和创新过程中知识包容和可重复性的中心地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
20.50%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Responsible Innovation (JRI) provides a forum for discussions of the normative assessment and governance of knowledge-based innovation. JRI offers humanists, social scientists, policy analysts and legal scholars, and natural scientists and engineers an opportunity to articulate, strengthen, and critique the relations among approaches to responsible innovation, thus giving further shape to a newly emerging community of research and practice. These approaches include ethics, technology assessment, governance, sustainability, socio-technical integration, and others. JRI intends responsible innovation to be inclusive of such terms as responsible development and sustainable development, and the journal invites comparisons and contrasts among such concepts. While issues of risk and environmental health and safety are relevant, JRI especially encourages attention to the assessment of the broader and more subtle human and social dimensions of innovation—including moral, cultural, political, and religious dimensions, social risk, and sustainability addressed in a systemic fashion.
期刊最新文献
Responsible innovation across societal sectors: a practice perspective on Quadruple Helix collaboration Navigating diverging responsibilities for inclusion in a biobased value chain: the case of Solaris tobacco in South Africa Towards transformative innovation ecosystems: a systemic approach to responsible innovation Conceptualizing RRI from a Global South perspective through Indigenous innovation practices in Aotearoa New Zealand’s high-tech science sector Brokering responsible research and innovation in in silico medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1