A preliminary evaluation of unified protocol in anxiety disorders in India: a multiple baseline study protocol

A. B., P. Sudhir, Shyam Sundar Arumugham
{"title":"A preliminary evaluation of unified protocol in anxiety disorders in India: a multiple baseline study protocol","authors":"A. B., P. Sudhir, Shyam Sundar Arumugham","doi":"10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20230054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent with high rates of comorbidity. Single disease protocols have been the predominant choice of psychological treatment, however, there has been an increasing focus on transdiagnostic, shared mechanisms. Unified protocol is an emotion-focused CBT that addresses core vulnerabilities by training individuals in adaptive emotion regulation skills. UP has gained research attention in the management of emotional disorders with its modular approach. A challenge in psychotherapy research has been to understand the mechanisms of interventions and their effect on symptoms. Thus single-case experimental design has the potential to address some of the key questions. We present a research protocol that aims to examine the effectiveness of the unified protocol, using the SCED.\nMethods: A single-case experimental design, with multiple baseline assessments, will be employed, with random allocation to 2- or 3-week baselines. Patients with a primary diagnosis of anxiety disorder, consenting to baseline assessments, and stabilized at least for 4 weeks of medication will be recruited. Assessments will be carried out at baseline, post, and three months, in addition to weekly assessments on the primary outcome measure, anxiety by an independent blind rater. Secondary outcomes include intolerance to uncertainty, neuroticism, emotion regulation, and anxiety sensitivity.\nConclusions: The findings of this study would contribute to the empirical status of transdiagnostic interventions in symptom reduction and in addressing shared mechanisms, enhancing its clinical relevance for co-morbid disorders.\nTrial Registration: The study has been registered in clinical trials registry of India, No. CTRI/2021/01/030803; 28 January 2021.","PeriodicalId":13787,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Trials","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20230054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent with high rates of comorbidity. Single disease protocols have been the predominant choice of psychological treatment, however, there has been an increasing focus on transdiagnostic, shared mechanisms. Unified protocol is an emotion-focused CBT that addresses core vulnerabilities by training individuals in adaptive emotion regulation skills. UP has gained research attention in the management of emotional disorders with its modular approach. A challenge in psychotherapy research has been to understand the mechanisms of interventions and their effect on symptoms. Thus single-case experimental design has the potential to address some of the key questions. We present a research protocol that aims to examine the effectiveness of the unified protocol, using the SCED. Methods: A single-case experimental design, with multiple baseline assessments, will be employed, with random allocation to 2- or 3-week baselines. Patients with a primary diagnosis of anxiety disorder, consenting to baseline assessments, and stabilized at least for 4 weeks of medication will be recruited. Assessments will be carried out at baseline, post, and three months, in addition to weekly assessments on the primary outcome measure, anxiety by an independent blind rater. Secondary outcomes include intolerance to uncertainty, neuroticism, emotion regulation, and anxiety sensitivity. Conclusions: The findings of this study would contribute to the empirical status of transdiagnostic interventions in symptom reduction and in addressing shared mechanisms, enhancing its clinical relevance for co-morbid disorders. Trial Registration: The study has been registered in clinical trials registry of India, No. CTRI/2021/01/030803; 28 January 2021.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度焦虑症统一方案的初步评价:多基线研究方案
背景:焦虑症是一种非常普遍的疾病,其合并症发生率很高。单一疾病方案一直是心理治疗的主要选择,然而,越来越多的人关注跨诊断、共享机制。统一协议是一种以情绪为中心的CBT,通过训练个体的适应性情绪调节技能来解决核心弱点。UP以其模块化的方法在情绪障碍管理方面获得了研究关注。心理治疗研究的一个挑战是了解干预的机制及其对症状的影响。因此,单例实验设计有可能解决一些关键问题。我们提出一份研究协议,目的是利用经济与经济发展局来检验统一协议的有效性。方法:采用单例实验设计,采用多基线评估,随机分配2周或3周基线。初步诊断为焦虑症的患者,同意基线评估,并稳定至少4周的药物将被招募。除了由独立的盲评者对主要结果指标焦虑进行每周评估外,还将在基线、术后和三个月进行评估。次要结局包括对不确定性的不耐受、神经质、情绪调节和焦虑敏感性。结论:本研究的发现将有助于提高跨诊断干预在减轻症状和解决共同机制方面的经验地位,增强其与共病疾病的临床相关性。试验注册:本研究已在印度临床试验注册中心注册,注册号:CTRI / 2021/01/030803;2021年1月28日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of video feedback intervention on mother-infant interactional quality for women with perinatal mental health illnesses: protocol for a pilot randomised control trial Perioperative management of hyperglycemic patients undergoing surgery: an observational cross sectional study in a tertiary care hospital Perception of decentralized clinical trials and home nursing in oncology clinical research: insights from a survey of clinical research professionals across experimental sites A randomized clinical study comparing Trupler skin stapler and Trulon polyamide suture in post-surgical skin closure during orthopaedic and open abdominal surgeries Immediate effects of bandha hasta utthanasana on cerebral hemodynamics in healthy individuals: a protocol for randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1