Augmented Gravity Field Modelling by Combining EIGEN_6C4 and Topographic Potential Models

Remote. Sens. Pub Date : 2023-07-06 DOI:10.3390/rs15133418
Panpan Zhang, L. Bao, Yange Ma, Xinyu Liu
{"title":"Augmented Gravity Field Modelling by Combining EIGEN_6C4 and Topographic Potential Models","authors":"Panpan Zhang, L. Bao, Yange Ma, Xinyu Liu","doi":"10.3390/rs15133418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the key goals of geodesy is to study the fine structure of the Earth’s gravity field and construct a high-resolution gravity field model (GFM). Aiming at the current insufficient resolution problem of the EIGEN_6C4 model, the refined ultra-high degree models EIGEN_3660 and EIGEN_5480 are determined with a spectral expansion approach in this study, which is to augment EIGEN_6C4 model using topographic potential models (TPMs). A comparative spectral evaluation for EIGEN_6C4, EIGEN_3660, and EIGEN_5480 models indicates that the gravity field spectral powers of EIGEN_3660 and EIGEN_5480 models outperform the EIGEN_6C4 model after degree 2000. The augmented models EIGEN_3660 and EIGEN_5480 are verified using the deflection of the vertical (DOV) of China and Colorado, gravity data from Australia and mainland America, and GNSS/leveling in China. The validation results indicate that the accuracy of EIGEN_3660 and EIGEN_5480 models in determining height anomaly, DOV, and gravity anomaly outperform the EIGEN_6C4 model, and the EIGEN_5480 model has optimal accuracy. The accuracy of EIGEN_5480 model in determining south–north component and east–west component of the DOV in China has been improved by about 21.1% and 23.1% compared to the EIGEN_6C4 model, respectively. In the mountainous Colorado, the accuracy of EIGEN_5480 model in determining south–north component and east–west component of the DOV has been improved by about 28.2% and 35.2% compared to EIGEN_6C4 model, respectively. In addition, gravity value comparison results in Australia and mainland America indicate that the accuracy of the EIGEN_5480 model for deriving gravity anomalies is improved by 16.5% and 11.3% compared to the EIGEN_6C4 model, respectively.","PeriodicalId":20944,"journal":{"name":"Remote. Sens.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote. Sens.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the key goals of geodesy is to study the fine structure of the Earth’s gravity field and construct a high-resolution gravity field model (GFM). Aiming at the current insufficient resolution problem of the EIGEN_6C4 model, the refined ultra-high degree models EIGEN_3660 and EIGEN_5480 are determined with a spectral expansion approach in this study, which is to augment EIGEN_6C4 model using topographic potential models (TPMs). A comparative spectral evaluation for EIGEN_6C4, EIGEN_3660, and EIGEN_5480 models indicates that the gravity field spectral powers of EIGEN_3660 and EIGEN_5480 models outperform the EIGEN_6C4 model after degree 2000. The augmented models EIGEN_3660 and EIGEN_5480 are verified using the deflection of the vertical (DOV) of China and Colorado, gravity data from Australia and mainland America, and GNSS/leveling in China. The validation results indicate that the accuracy of EIGEN_3660 and EIGEN_5480 models in determining height anomaly, DOV, and gravity anomaly outperform the EIGEN_6C4 model, and the EIGEN_5480 model has optimal accuracy. The accuracy of EIGEN_5480 model in determining south–north component and east–west component of the DOV in China has been improved by about 21.1% and 23.1% compared to the EIGEN_6C4 model, respectively. In the mountainous Colorado, the accuracy of EIGEN_5480 model in determining south–north component and east–west component of the DOV has been improved by about 28.2% and 35.2% compared to EIGEN_6C4 model, respectively. In addition, gravity value comparison results in Australia and mainland America indicate that the accuracy of the EIGEN_5480 model for deriving gravity anomalies is improved by 16.5% and 11.3% compared to the EIGEN_6C4 model, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合EIGEN_6C4和地形势模型的增广重力场模拟
大地测量学的关键目标之一是研究地球重力场的精细结构,建立高分辨率的重力场模型。针对当前EIGEN_6C4模型分辨率不足的问题,本文采用谱展开方法确定了EIGEN_3660和EIGEN_5480的精细超高度模型,即利用地形势模型(TPMs)对EIGEN_6C4模型进行扩充。对EIGEN_6C4、EIGEN_3660和EIGEN_5480模型进行了光谱对比评价,结果表明,2000度后,EIGEN_3660和EIGEN_5480模型的重力场谱功率优于EIGEN_6C4模型。利用中国和科罗拉多州的垂直偏转(DOV)、澳大利亚和美洲大陆的重力数据以及中国的GNSS/水准对增强模型EIGEN_3660和EIGEN_5480进行了验证。验证结果表明,EIGEN_3660和EIGEN_5480模型在确定高程异常、DOV和重力异常方面的精度优于EIGEN_6C4模型,其中EIGEN_5480模型具有最佳精度。与EIGEN_6C4模型相比,EIGEN_5480模型测定中国DOV的南北分量和东西分量的精度分别提高了21.1%和23.1%。在科罗拉多州山区,与EIGEN_6C4模式相比,EIGEN_5480模式对DOV的南北分量和东西分量的测定精度分别提高了28.2%和35.2%。此外,澳大利亚和美洲大陆的重力值对比结果表明,与EIGEN_6C4模型相比,EIGEN_5480模型反演重力异常的精度分别提高了16.5%和11.3%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influences of Different Factors on Gravity Wave Activity in the Lower Stratosphere of the Indian Region Estimating Sugarcane Aboveground Biomass and Carbon Stock Using the Combined Time Series of Sentinel Data with Machine Learning Algorithms Dynamic Screening Strategy Based on Feature Graphs for UAV Object and Group Re-Identification The Expanding of Proglacial Lake Amplified the Frontal Ablation of Jiongpu Co Glacier since 1985 Investigation of Light-Scattering Properties of Non-Spherical Sea Salt Aerosol Particles at Varying Levels of Relative Humidity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1