Endovascular treatment of proximal venous outflow obstructions in patients with arteriovenous fistula: Our single-center experience

S. Ömür
{"title":"Endovascular treatment of proximal venous outflow obstructions in patients with arteriovenous fistula: Our single-center experience","authors":"S. Ömür","doi":"10.9739/tjvs.2022.1169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: In this study, we present our early and mid-term results of percutaneous treatment for proximal venous outflow obstruction (PVOO). Patients and methods: Between January 2017 and July 2019, a total of 40 patients (19 males, 21 females; mean age: 61.9±12.1 years; range, 49 to 74 years) who underwent hemodialysis from the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) were included. All patients had advanced edema due to PVOO in the extremity with AVF. All patients received endovascular treatment for PVOO. Results: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was performed to all patients. Stent implantation was performed in 20 patients who could not achieve full patency after PTA. A patient whose edema did not regress despite stent implantation underwent surgical AVF recreation. A total of six patients underwent minor/major surgical procedures. In 14 patients, edema completely regressed and the functionality of the fistula increased in the one-month follow-up after the PTA procedure. The patients who underwent percutaneous intervention were evaluated at 3, 6, 12, and 24-months of follow-up, and primary patency rates were found to be 92%, 82%, 67%, and 45%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that PVOO should not be overlooked in patients with AVF, edema in the extremity, and no loss of fistula functionality. Percutaneous interventions should be considered primarily in the treatment of PVOO.","PeriodicalId":23982,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9739/tjvs.2022.1169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we present our early and mid-term results of percutaneous treatment for proximal venous outflow obstruction (PVOO). Patients and methods: Between January 2017 and July 2019, a total of 40 patients (19 males, 21 females; mean age: 61.9±12.1 years; range, 49 to 74 years) who underwent hemodialysis from the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) were included. All patients had advanced edema due to PVOO in the extremity with AVF. All patients received endovascular treatment for PVOO. Results: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was performed to all patients. Stent implantation was performed in 20 patients who could not achieve full patency after PTA. A patient whose edema did not regress despite stent implantation underwent surgical AVF recreation. A total of six patients underwent minor/major surgical procedures. In 14 patients, edema completely regressed and the functionality of the fistula increased in the one-month follow-up after the PTA procedure. The patients who underwent percutaneous intervention were evaluated at 3, 6, 12, and 24-months of follow-up, and primary patency rates were found to be 92%, 82%, 67%, and 45%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that PVOO should not be overlooked in patients with AVF, edema in the extremity, and no loss of fistula functionality. Percutaneous interventions should be considered primarily in the treatment of PVOO.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动静脉瘘患者近端静脉流出梗阻的血管内治疗:我们的单中心经验
目的:在本研究中,我们报告了经皮治疗近端静脉流出梗阻(PVOO)的早期和中期结果。患者与方法:2017年1月- 2019年7月,共40例患者(男19例,女21例;平均年龄:61.9±12.1岁;范围49 - 74岁),包括因动静脉瘘(AVF)而接受血液透析的患者。所有患者均因AVF的下肢PVOO而出现晚期水肿。所有患者均接受血管内治疗。结果:所有患者均行经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)。20例PTA术后不能完全通畅的患者行支架植入术。患者的水肿没有消退,尽管支架植入手术AVF重建。共有6名患者接受了小/大手术。14例患者在PTA手术后1个月的随访中,水肿完全消退,瘘管功能增强。接受经皮介入治疗的患者分别在随访3、6、12和24个月时进行评估,发现原发性通畅率分别为92%、82%、67%和45%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在AVF、四肢水肿和无瘘功能丧失的患者中,PVOO不应被忽视。经皮介入治疗应主要考虑PVOO的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Undesirable complication after transradial coronary angiography: A case report The factors influencing compliance in post-EVAR surveillance regarding the perspectives of practitioners and patients Risk factors for chronic venous insufficiency in nurses in Türkiye - NueVo TR Investigation of factors affecting reintervention after type A aortic dissection Carotid-subclavian bypass in the treatment of subclavian artery occlusion during epidermoid cyst excision: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1