Bite-Force Scaling across Size Classes in the Alligator Snapping Turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) and the Common Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina)

IF 0.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Southeastern Naturalist Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1656/058.022.0sp1228
Seth LaGrange, E. Kessler, Zhuang Li, Flavio Morrissiey, Mark Merchant
{"title":"Bite-Force Scaling across Size Classes in the Alligator Snapping Turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) and the Common Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina)","authors":"Seth LaGrange, E. Kessler, Zhuang Li, Flavio Morrissiey, Mark Merchant","doi":"10.1656/058.022.0sp1228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract - Understanding feeding performance can inform feeding ecology and niche dynamics. Macrochelys temminckii (Alligator Snapping Turtle) and Chelydra serpentina (Common Snapping Turtle) are closely related, sympatric species with documented interactions. To understand ontogenetic and interspecific differences in bite performance, we measured bite force in an ontogenetic series of 62 Alligator Snapping Turtles and 33 Common Snapping Turtles. Within species, bite force positively correlated with size but scaled differently by species. Alligator Snapping Turtles produced higher maximum bite forces overall throughout ontogeny than Common Snapping Turtles, although Alligator Snapping Turtles reach significantly larger maximum sizes than Common Snapping Turtles, thereby enabling them to produce higher maximum bite forces. Differences in bite force between these species provide biomechanical context for distinctions in the ecologies of both species.","PeriodicalId":49490,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Naturalist","volume":"14 40 1","pages":"440 - 456"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeastern Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1656/058.022.0sp1228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract - Understanding feeding performance can inform feeding ecology and niche dynamics. Macrochelys temminckii (Alligator Snapping Turtle) and Chelydra serpentina (Common Snapping Turtle) are closely related, sympatric species with documented interactions. To understand ontogenetic and interspecific differences in bite performance, we measured bite force in an ontogenetic series of 62 Alligator Snapping Turtles and 33 Common Snapping Turtles. Within species, bite force positively correlated with size but scaled differently by species. Alligator Snapping Turtles produced higher maximum bite forces overall throughout ontogeny than Common Snapping Turtles, although Alligator Snapping Turtles reach significantly larger maximum sizes than Common Snapping Turtles, thereby enabling them to produce higher maximum bite forces. Differences in bite force between these species provide biomechanical context for distinctions in the ecologies of both species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
短吻鳄鳄龟(Macrochelys temminckii)和普通鳄龟(Chelydra serpentina)的咬合力分级
摘要-了解摄食性能可以为摄食生态学和生态位动力学提供信息。Macrochelys temminckii(短吻鳄鳄龟)和Chelydra serpentina(普通鳄龟)是密切相关的同域物种,具有文献记载的相互作用。为了了解咬合力在个体发生和种间的差异,我们测量了62只鳄鳄龟和33只普通鳄龟的咬合力。在物种内,咬合力与大小呈正相关,但不同物种的比例不同。鳄鳄鳄龟在整个个体发育过程中比普通鳄龟产生更高的最大咬合力,尽管鳄鳄鳄龟的最大体型明显大于普通鳄龟,从而使它们能够产生更高的最大咬合力。这些物种之间咬合力的差异为这两个物种的生态差异提供了生物力学背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Southeastern Naturalist
Southeastern Naturalist 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
31
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Southeastern Naturalist covers all aspects of the natural history sciences of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine organisms and the environments of the southeastern portion of North America, roughly bounded from North Carolina south to Florida, west to Texas, north to Oklahoma, and east back to North Carolina. Manuscripts based on field studies outside of this region that provide information on species within this region may be considered at the Editor’s discretion.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Breeding Birds in Central Business Districts of 10 Small Cities and Towns: The Northern Pee Dee Region of the Carolinas The Relationship between Female Body Size and Clutch Size in Frosted Flatwoods Salamanders (Ambystoma cingulatum) Diminished Seed Banks of Two Endemic Scrub Herbs in Roadside Habitat Belie Their Population Booms: Are Robust Roadside Populations a Conservation Mirage? Comparing Aratus pisonii Distributions across Built and Woody Habitats along a Population Range Margin Clay Models and eDNA are Useful Tools for Identifying Predators of Salamanders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1