China and Lithium Geopolitics in a Changing Global Market.

IF 3.1 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Chinese Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI:10.1007/s41111-022-00227-3
Suleyman Orhun Altiparmak
{"title":"China and Lithium Geopolitics in a Changing Global Market.","authors":"Suleyman Orhun Altiparmak","doi":"10.1007/s41111-022-00227-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The energy market is shifting from fossil fuels to renewables. This transition is creating new geopolitical dynamics. In the past, traditional energy geopolitics focused on the concentrated distribution of fossil fuel resources and the conflicts and dependencies that this created. In contrast, the 'new' renewable energy geopolitics emphasises the dispersed distribution or decentralisation of production capacity and the independence of states this generates. However, the market for lithium, which is essential to renewable energy storage through being a key component of lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, does not entirely fit theoretical conceptions of the renewable energy market's dynamics. By focusing on China as a critical case, this article shows that lithium geopolitics has potentially created new (inter)dependencies and opportunities for conflicts, while also paradoxically enhancing state interindependence in renewable technology energy production. Thus, this hybrid form of energy geopolitics necessitates revising conventional energy security explanations to match these new market conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":44455,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Political Science Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-022-00227-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The energy market is shifting from fossil fuels to renewables. This transition is creating new geopolitical dynamics. In the past, traditional energy geopolitics focused on the concentrated distribution of fossil fuel resources and the conflicts and dependencies that this created. In contrast, the 'new' renewable energy geopolitics emphasises the dispersed distribution or decentralisation of production capacity and the independence of states this generates. However, the market for lithium, which is essential to renewable energy storage through being a key component of lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, does not entirely fit theoretical conceptions of the renewable energy market's dynamics. By focusing on China as a critical case, this article shows that lithium geopolitics has potentially created new (inter)dependencies and opportunities for conflicts, while also paradoxically enhancing state interindependence in renewable technology energy production. Thus, this hybrid form of energy geopolitics necessitates revising conventional energy security explanations to match these new market conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球市场变化中的中国与锂地缘政治。
能源市场正在从化石燃料转向可再生能源。这种转变正在创造新的地缘政治动态。过去,传统的能源地缘政治关注的是化石燃料资源的集中分布以及由此产生的冲突和依赖。相比之下,“新的”可再生能源地缘政治强调生产能力的分散分布或分散以及由此产生的国家独立性。然而,作为锂离子(Li-ion)电池的关键组成部分,锂对可再生能源存储至关重要,但锂市场并不完全符合可再生能源市场动态的理论概念。通过将中国作为一个关键案例,本文表明,锂地缘政治可能会为冲突创造新的(相互)依赖和机会,同时也矛盾地增强了国家在可再生技术能源生产方面的相互独立性。因此,这种混合形式的能源地缘政治需要修改传统的能源安全解释,以适应这些新的市场条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: This journal aims to publish original and cutting-edge research in all areas of political science, such as political theory, comparative politics, international relations, public administration, public policy, methodology, and Chinese politics and government. In the meantime it also provides a major and visible platform for the intellectual dialogue between Chinese and international scholars, and disseminate scholarship that can shed light on the ever changing field of Chinese political studies, stimulate reflective discourse as the field continues to develop both within and outside China. All research articles published in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review. In additional original research articles, Chinese Political Science Review also publishes book reviews to disseminate comprehensive reviews of emerging topics in all areas of political science.
期刊最新文献
Small Data Approaches to Link Faster Time Scale Engagement Dynamics with Slower Time Scale Outcomes in Biobehavioral Interventions. The Social Integration of Floating Ethnic Minorities: A Comparative Study of Tibetans in Beijing and Chengdu, China The Disappearing “Period of Strategic Opportunity”: Implications for China’s Grand Strategy in a New Era "Whole-Process People’s Democracy" in China: Evidence from Shanghai New Chinese Economic Policy to Latin America? A QCA Approach to the Belt and Road Initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1