Comparison of outcome between traditional open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy operation

Farjana Haque Shumi, Md Omar Ali, Md. Akram Hossain
{"title":"Comparison of outcome between traditional open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy operation","authors":"Farjana Haque Shumi, Md Omar Ali, Md. Akram Hossain","doi":"10.3329/jss.v21i2.43917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Haemorrhoidectomy is a surgical excision and removal of the hemorrhoid used primarily only in severe cases. There are many different types of haemorrhoidectomy like open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy. \nObjective: To compare the outcome of stapled haemorrhoidectomy and traditional open haemorrhoidectomy. Methods: This is a cross sectional study of 72 cases who underwent open and stapled haemorrhoidectomy operation for symptomatic 2nd, 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids. Binomial probability pre-posttest were used for statistical analysis, p value less than 0.05 was taken as significant. \nResults: : Among 72 patients, 34 patients of conventional haemorrhoidectomy and 38 of stapled haemorrhoidectomy at 3 months post-surgery in conventional group 1 patient was unsatisfied, 12 patients were satisfied and 4 patients stated their condition good. In stapled group 14 patients stated their condition excellent and 5 patients stated their condition good. Statistical analysis shows that level of satisfaction at 3 months post-surgery in conventional group and stapled group was statistically significant(p-value<.001). \nConclusion: Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a relatively new procedure. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a safe procedure, less pain and disabled than the conventional haemorrhoidectomy. \nJournal of Surgical Sciences (2017) Vol. 21 (2): 99-104","PeriodicalId":33248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jss.v21i2.43917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Haemorrhoidectomy is a surgical excision and removal of the hemorrhoid used primarily only in severe cases. There are many different types of haemorrhoidectomy like open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Objective: To compare the outcome of stapled haemorrhoidectomy and traditional open haemorrhoidectomy. Methods: This is a cross sectional study of 72 cases who underwent open and stapled haemorrhoidectomy operation for symptomatic 2nd, 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids. Binomial probability pre-posttest were used for statistical analysis, p value less than 0.05 was taken as significant. Results: : Among 72 patients, 34 patients of conventional haemorrhoidectomy and 38 of stapled haemorrhoidectomy at 3 months post-surgery in conventional group 1 patient was unsatisfied, 12 patients were satisfied and 4 patients stated their condition good. In stapled group 14 patients stated their condition excellent and 5 patients stated their condition good. Statistical analysis shows that level of satisfaction at 3 months post-surgery in conventional group and stapled group was statistically significant(p-value<.001). Conclusion: Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a relatively new procedure. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a safe procedure, less pain and disabled than the conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2017) Vol. 21 (2): 99-104
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统切开痔切除术与缝合痔切除术疗效比较
背景:痔疮切除术是一种主要用于严重病例的手术切除和移除痔疮。有许多不同类型的痔疮切除术,如开放式痔疮切除术和缝合式痔疮切除术。目的:比较缝合痔切除术与传统切开痔切除术的疗效。方法:对72例有症状的二度、三度和四度痔疮行切开和缝合痔切除术的患者进行横断面研究。采用二项概率前后检验进行统计学分析,以p值< 0.05为显著性。结果:72例患者中,常规组术后3个月常规痔切除术34例,缝合痔切除术38例,不满意1例,满意12例,良好4例。缝合组14例表现良好,5例表现良好。统计分析显示,常规组与钉书钉组术后3个月满意度差异有统计学意义(p值< 0.001)。结论:痔钉切除术是一种较新的手术方法。吻合器痔切除术是一种安全的手术,比传统的痔切除术疼痛和残疾更少。外科杂志(2017)Vol. 21 (2): 99-104
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
3D PRINTING IN PEDIATRIC ORTHOPEDICS – THE NEW GENERATION OF PREOPERATIVE PLANNING IN THE FIELD OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPEDICS SPONTANEOUS RUPTURE OF DOUBLE J URETERAL STENT LARYNGEAL SYNOVIAL SARCOMA – A CASE REPORT EARLY OUTCOME OF PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY IN SEPTUAGENARIANS AND OCTOGENARIANS IN NEPAL The efficacy of serial physical examination in management of penetrating abdominal trauma to avoid negative laparotomy in selected cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1