21st century home haemodialysis: a new approach to an old treatment.

P. Lunts
{"title":"21st century home haemodialysis: a new approach to an old treatment.","authors":"P. Lunts","doi":"10.1111/J.1755-6686.2001.TB00145.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Home therapies are increasingly being demonstrated to be the best treatments for the early stages of the dialysis life-cycle. Although home haemodialysis has declined dramatically over the last 20 years from 41% in 1983 (1) to 3.2% in 1998 in the UK alone (2), many studies have suggested that it offers the optimum dialysis in terms of outcomes (3,4,5). Evidence from a 1998 survey of UK dialysis staff indicates that the major perceived drawbacks of home haemodialysis were lack of suitable patients, family stress, cost of machines and training time (6). The study also strongly indicated that a lack of familiarity with the treatment was a major cause of its decline in many units. We set out to redesign our approach to home haemodialysis to make it suitable for many more patients.","PeriodicalId":79589,"journal":{"name":"EDTNA/ERCA journal (English ed.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDTNA/ERCA journal (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1755-6686.2001.TB00145.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Home therapies are increasingly being demonstrated to be the best treatments for the early stages of the dialysis life-cycle. Although home haemodialysis has declined dramatically over the last 20 years from 41% in 1983 (1) to 3.2% in 1998 in the UK alone (2), many studies have suggested that it offers the optimum dialysis in terms of outcomes (3,4,5). Evidence from a 1998 survey of UK dialysis staff indicates that the major perceived drawbacks of home haemodialysis were lack of suitable patients, family stress, cost of machines and training time (6). The study also strongly indicated that a lack of familiarity with the treatment was a major cause of its decline in many units. We set out to redesign our approach to home haemodialysis to make it suitable for many more patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
21世纪家庭血液透析:旧疗法的新方法。
家庭治疗越来越多地被证明是透析生命周期早期阶段的最佳治疗方法。尽管在过去的20年中,仅在英国,家庭血液透析的比例就从1983年的41%(1)急剧下降到1998年的3.2%(2),但许多研究表明,就结果而言,家庭血液透析提供了最佳的透析(3,4,5)。1998年对英国透析人员的调查证据表明,家庭血液透析的主要缺点是缺乏合适的患者、家庭压力、机器成本和培训时间(6)。该研究还强烈表明,缺乏对治疗的熟悉是许多单位血液透析下降的主要原因。我们开始重新设计我们的家庭血液透析方法,使其适合更多的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Merits and limitations of continuous blood volume monitoring during haemodialysis. Summary of the EDTNA/ERCA Journal Club discussion: Winter 2005. Why clown-doctors are needed in paediatric wards. Telephone interview with Fresenius Medical Care project leader Mr. Jonas: launch of 5008 Therapy System. The use of telemedicine to assess and advise patients regarding dietary treatment of hyperphosphataemia. The conductivity of dialysis fluid.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1