Ayurveda drug usage pattern among rural and urban populations: A cross-sectional survey from Bengaluru, Karnataka

R. Naik, M. Shubhashree, C. Chandrasekharan, S. Bhat, R. Acharya
{"title":"Ayurveda drug usage pattern among rural and urban populations: A cross-sectional survey from Bengaluru, Karnataka","authors":"R. Naik, M. Shubhashree, C. Chandrasekharan, S. Bhat, R. Acharya","doi":"10.4103/ijar.ijar_10_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Rational use of medicines by following the prescription guidelines is a primary determinant of treatment success. Rationality when using Ayurvedic prescriptions is even more critical, since the prescriptions are often individualized. Nonadherence to the medication guidelines both in clinical practice and research activity hinders the therapeutic efficacy and shows low clinical outcomes. Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the Ayurveda drug usage pattern in urban and rural populations. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 400 participants, 200 each from urban and rural areas of Bengaluru, Karnataka. Results: It is observed that most participants followed the doctor's or pharmacist's directions, clarified their doubts about the medicines, and completed the course of treatment as per the doctor's advice. Only 30% of rural and 43.5% of the urban population reported that they follow advice regarding using a vehicle with the medicines. Comparatively, a more proportion of rural participants (11.50%) were always practicing self-medication compared to urban (5%). About 17% of rural and 23.50% of urban participants reported the practice of concurrent medication. Although more than half of the participants in the present study (52.5%) were storing the medicines in air-tight containers, inappropriate storage practices such as keeping the medication on open shelves (19.75%) and the table (4.5%) were also observed. Only 49% of rural and 70% of the urban population reported the practice of checking the expiry date. Inappropriate disposal practices such as throwing and storing unused/expired medicines were observed both in rural and urban regions. Conclusion: Although a fair medication usage pattern and behavior is noticed, both rural and urban communities have imperfections with drug use practices such as self-medication, medicine lending, storage, and disposal practices.","PeriodicalId":88901,"journal":{"name":"International journal of Ayurveda research","volume":"4 1","pages":"61 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of Ayurveda research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijar.ijar_10_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rational use of medicines by following the prescription guidelines is a primary determinant of treatment success. Rationality when using Ayurvedic prescriptions is even more critical, since the prescriptions are often individualized. Nonadherence to the medication guidelines both in clinical practice and research activity hinders the therapeutic efficacy and shows low clinical outcomes. Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the Ayurveda drug usage pattern in urban and rural populations. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 400 participants, 200 each from urban and rural areas of Bengaluru, Karnataka. Results: It is observed that most participants followed the doctor's or pharmacist's directions, clarified their doubts about the medicines, and completed the course of treatment as per the doctor's advice. Only 30% of rural and 43.5% of the urban population reported that they follow advice regarding using a vehicle with the medicines. Comparatively, a more proportion of rural participants (11.50%) were always practicing self-medication compared to urban (5%). About 17% of rural and 23.50% of urban participants reported the practice of concurrent medication. Although more than half of the participants in the present study (52.5%) were storing the medicines in air-tight containers, inappropriate storage practices such as keeping the medication on open shelves (19.75%) and the table (4.5%) were also observed. Only 49% of rural and 70% of the urban population reported the practice of checking the expiry date. Inappropriate disposal practices such as throwing and storing unused/expired medicines were observed both in rural and urban regions. Conclusion: Although a fair medication usage pattern and behavior is noticed, both rural and urban communities have imperfections with drug use practices such as self-medication, medicine lending, storage, and disposal practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿育吠陀药物在农村和城市人口中的使用模式:来自卡纳塔克邦班加罗尔的横断面调查
背景:遵循处方指南合理用药是治疗成功的主要决定因素。使用阿育吠陀处方时的合理性更为关键,因为处方通常是个性化的。在临床实践和研究活动中,不遵守用药指南阻碍了治疗效果,临床结果不佳。目的:研究阿育吠陀药物在城乡人群中的使用情况。材料和方法:对400名参与者进行了横断面调查,其中各200名来自卡纳塔克邦班加罗尔的城市和农村地区。结果:大部分患者遵守医生或药师的指导,澄清对药物的疑虑,并按照医嘱完成疗程。只有30%的农村人口和43.5%的城市人口报告说,他们遵循有关使用载药车辆的建议。相比之下,农村参与者(11.50%)经常进行自我药疗的比例高于城市参与者(5%)。约17%的农村和23.50%的城市参与者报告了同时用药的做法。虽然在本研究中超过一半的参与者(52.5%)将药物储存在气密容器中,但也观察到不适当的储存方法,例如将药物放在开放式架子上(19.75%)和桌子上(4.5%)。只有49%的农村人口和70%的城市人口报告有检查有效期的做法。在农村和城市地区都发现了诸如丢弃和储存未使用/过期药品等不当处置做法。结论:虽然农村和城市社区的用药模式和用药行为较为公平,但在自我用药、药物出借、储存和处置等用药实践方面存在不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive review of Pāṭhabheda (variant readings) in Carakasaṁhitā Vaidya Saadhana: Dharmaparo Bhavet (act righteously) Artificial intelligence in the sector of Ayurveda: Scope and opportunities Use of Ayush measures and advocacies by Ayush practitioners and health seekers for the prevention of coronavirus disease-19: Cross-sectional analysis of an application-based data Preparation and preliminary physicochemical profile of Kaphaketu rasa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1