Shape and Dimensions of Sella Turcica in Cleft And Non-Cleft Palate Subjects: A Radiographic Study

Ayman Eltabakh, Walaa El Gemeay, Ahmed El Rawdy, A. Ramadan
{"title":"Shape and Dimensions of Sella Turcica in Cleft And Non-Cleft Palate Subjects: A Radiographic Study","authors":"Ayman Eltabakh, Walaa El Gemeay, Ahmed El Rawdy, A. Ramadan","doi":"10.21608/dsu.2023.142037.1127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The Sella turcica is a significant anatomical structure because the Sella point, S, is one of the most used landmarks in cephalometries. It is located at the center of the Sella turcica. In healthy individuals, the surface area of the Sella turcica varies from 18-115 mm in females and from 22-122 mm 2 in males. The shape of Sella turcica is usually oval.but round and flat types can also occur. Aim: This study aimed to describe and compare the shape and dimensions of Sella turcica in cleft and non-cleft palate subjects. Materials and methods: Cone beam computed tomography of 80 individuals (40 normal and 40 clefts) with age range 12-30 years were collected and analyzed. The linear measurements of length, depth, and diameter were measured and compared between both groups. Results: The Sella turcica normally appeared in the majority of subjects 61.5% in non-cleft subjects while in cleft group was 40%, the oblique anterior wall in the non-cleft was found to be 19%, and in cleft left 17%. Regarding notching in the posterior wall was found 9% in non-cleft and 14% in cleft group, and bridging was found to be 7% in non-cleft group and 16% in cleft group. In the non-cleft group pyramidal Sella turcica was 3.5% while in cleft double contour of the floor was seen in 13%. For linear measurements length, depth, and diameter of Sella turcica showed no significant differences between non cleft and cleft groups. Conclusion: No significance differences in the size of Sella turcica were found regarding length, depth, and diameter of Sella turcica of cleft CBCTs (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) when compared to those of non-cleft CBCTs. On comparing different cleft groups to each other there was only a significant increase in length for unilateral right complete cleft palate compared to other groups. No significance differences were found in comparing volume of Sella turcica between non cleft and cleft groups.","PeriodicalId":11270,"journal":{"name":"Dental Science Updates","volume":"232 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Science Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2023.142037.1127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Sella turcica is a significant anatomical structure because the Sella point, S, is one of the most used landmarks in cephalometries. It is located at the center of the Sella turcica. In healthy individuals, the surface area of the Sella turcica varies from 18-115 mm in females and from 22-122 mm 2 in males. The shape of Sella turcica is usually oval.but round and flat types can also occur. Aim: This study aimed to describe and compare the shape and dimensions of Sella turcica in cleft and non-cleft palate subjects. Materials and methods: Cone beam computed tomography of 80 individuals (40 normal and 40 clefts) with age range 12-30 years were collected and analyzed. The linear measurements of length, depth, and diameter were measured and compared between both groups. Results: The Sella turcica normally appeared in the majority of subjects 61.5% in non-cleft subjects while in cleft group was 40%, the oblique anterior wall in the non-cleft was found to be 19%, and in cleft left 17%. Regarding notching in the posterior wall was found 9% in non-cleft and 14% in cleft group, and bridging was found to be 7% in non-cleft group and 16% in cleft group. In the non-cleft group pyramidal Sella turcica was 3.5% while in cleft double contour of the floor was seen in 13%. For linear measurements length, depth, and diameter of Sella turcica showed no significant differences between non cleft and cleft groups. Conclusion: No significance differences in the size of Sella turcica were found regarding length, depth, and diameter of Sella turcica of cleft CBCTs (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) when compared to those of non-cleft CBCTs. On comparing different cleft groups to each other there was only a significant increase in length for unilateral right complete cleft palate compared to other groups. No significance differences were found in comparing volume of Sella turcica between non cleft and cleft groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腭裂与非腭裂患者蝶鞍形状与尺寸的影像学研究
蝶鞍是一个重要的解剖结构,因为蝶鞍点S是头位测量中最常用的标志之一。它位于蝶鞍的中心。在健康个体中,蝶鞍的表面积在雌性中为18-115毫米,在雄性中为22-122毫米。蝶鞍的形状通常为椭圆形。但圆形和扁平型也可能出现。目的:本研究旨在描述和比较腭裂和非腭裂患者蝶鞍的形状和尺寸。材料与方法:收集并分析了年龄12 ~ 30岁的80例正常人(40例)和唇腭裂患者(40例)的锥形束ct。测量两组之间的长度、深度和直径的线性测量并进行比较。结果:蝶鞍正常出现在大多数受试者中,无裂组为61.5%,裂组为40%,无裂组为19%,左裂组为17%。后壁缺口在非裂组中占9%,在裂组中占14%;桥接在非裂组中占7%,在裂组中占16%。非裂组中锥体蝶鞍占3.5%,而裂组中双底轮廓占13%。在线性测量中,蝶鞍的长度、深度和直径在非裂口组和裂口组之间没有显著差异。结论:裂唇型cbct与非裂唇型cbct在蝶鞍长度、深度和直径上均无显著性差异。在比较不同的腭裂组时,单侧右完全性腭裂的长度比其他组明显增加。非裂组和裂组蝶鞍体积比较无显著性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EFFECT OF GAMMA-RADIATION ON DE- AND RE-MINERALIZATION OF ENAMEL AND DENTIN (An IN-VITRO STUDY) Comparison of Upper and Lower Canine Retraction Rates Assisted by Flapless Laser Corticotomy. Evaluation of Position and Treatment Difficulty of Impacted Maxillary Canine Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Study Histological and Molecular Assessment of Anti-inflammatory Effect of Different Concentrations of Hyaluronic Acid Injected in Inflamed Rabbit’s Tempromandibular Joint Effect of Using Two Different Techniques of Denture Base Fabrication on Retention of Maxillary Complete Denture: An in Vivo Comparative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1