SARS-CoV-2 Delta requires human ACE2 but not human TMPRSS2 to infect mice and elicits greater lung injury and adaptive immune response than Omicron in human ACE2 knock-in mice

S. Verma, Fernanda Ana-Sosa-Batiz, N. Shafee, Julia Timis, Erin Maule, Robyn Miller, Paolla DA Pinto, Kristen M. Valentine, Chris Conner, Devid Webb, K. Jarnagin, Kenneth Kim, S. Shresta
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 Delta requires human ACE2 but not human TMPRSS2 to infect mice and elicits greater lung injury and adaptive immune response than Omicron in human ACE2 knock-in mice","authors":"S. Verma, Fernanda Ana-Sosa-Batiz, N. Shafee, Julia Timis, Erin Maule, Robyn Miller, Paolla DA Pinto, Kristen M. Valentine, Chris Conner, Devid Webb, K. Jarnagin, Kenneth Kim, S. Shresta","doi":"10.4049/jimmunol.210.supp.75.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis remains poorly understood in large part due to lack of knowledge about the mechanisms of entry and behaviors of SARS-CoV-2 variants in vivo. We generated single and double knock-in (KI) mice expressing human ACE2 (hACE2) and/or human TMPRSS2 (hTMPRSS2) under endogenous promoters in place of murine ACE2 (mACE2) and TMPRSS2 on the C57BL/6 and BALAB/c genetic backgrounds to evaluate Delta vs Omicron BA.1 infection, disease, and immune response. Delta replication was observed in lungs of mice expressing hACE2 but not hTMPRSS2 or mACE2 following intranasal inoculation, and similar levels of Delta replication were observed in lungs of hACE2-KI and hACE2xhTMPRSS2-KI mice. Thus, Delta requires hACE2 but not hTMPRSS2 to infect mice. In contrast, BA.1 established similar levels of replication in lungs of single and double KI mice, demonstrating that BA.1 requires neither hACE2 nor hTMPRSS2 to infect mice. Although no significant differences in viral burden were observed in hACE2-KI mice infected with Delta vs BA.1, Delta-infected hACE2-KI mice exhibited increased histopathologic lung injury and higher SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses (spleen) and anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG titers (serum). Additionally, hACE2-KI mice on the C57BL/6 background showed more severe lung disease and stronger Th1 response than BALB/c. These results associate the severity of lung disease with the magnitude of Th1-dominant immune responses, and set a foundation for dissecting mechanisms of COVID-19 pathogenesis in hACE2-KI mice representing Th1- vs Th2-dominant genetic backgrounds.","PeriodicalId":22698,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Immunology","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.210.supp.75.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis remains poorly understood in large part due to lack of knowledge about the mechanisms of entry and behaviors of SARS-CoV-2 variants in vivo. We generated single and double knock-in (KI) mice expressing human ACE2 (hACE2) and/or human TMPRSS2 (hTMPRSS2) under endogenous promoters in place of murine ACE2 (mACE2) and TMPRSS2 on the C57BL/6 and BALAB/c genetic backgrounds to evaluate Delta vs Omicron BA.1 infection, disease, and immune response. Delta replication was observed in lungs of mice expressing hACE2 but not hTMPRSS2 or mACE2 following intranasal inoculation, and similar levels of Delta replication were observed in lungs of hACE2-KI and hACE2xhTMPRSS2-KI mice. Thus, Delta requires hACE2 but not hTMPRSS2 to infect mice. In contrast, BA.1 established similar levels of replication in lungs of single and double KI mice, demonstrating that BA.1 requires neither hACE2 nor hTMPRSS2 to infect mice. Although no significant differences in viral burden were observed in hACE2-KI mice infected with Delta vs BA.1, Delta-infected hACE2-KI mice exhibited increased histopathologic lung injury and higher SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses (spleen) and anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG titers (serum). Additionally, hACE2-KI mice on the C57BL/6 background showed more severe lung disease and stronger Th1 response than BALB/c. These results associate the severity of lung disease with the magnitude of Th1-dominant immune responses, and set a foundation for dissecting mechanisms of COVID-19 pathogenesis in hACE2-KI mice representing Th1- vs Th2-dominant genetic backgrounds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-CoV-2 δ需要人ACE2而不需要人TMPRSS2才能感染小鼠,并且在人ACE2敲入小鼠中引起比Omicron更大的肺损伤和适应性免疫反应
SARS-CoV-2的发病机制仍然知之甚少,这在很大程度上是由于缺乏对SARS-CoV-2变体在体内的进入机制和行为的了解。我们在C57BL/6和BALAB/c遗传背景下,在内源性启动子下生成表达人ACE2 (hACE2)和/或人TMPRSS2 (hTMPRSS2)的单敲入和双敲入(KI)小鼠,以取代小鼠ACE2 (mACE2)和TMPRSS2,以评估Delta与Omicron BA.1感染、疾病和免疫反应。鼻内接种后,在表达hACE2而不表达hTMPRSS2或mACE2的小鼠肺中观察到Delta复制,在hACE2- ki和hACE2xhTMPRSS2-KI小鼠肺中观察到相似水平的Delta复制。因此,Delta需要hACE2而不是hTMPRSS2来感染小鼠。相比之下,BA.1在单KI和双KI小鼠的肺中建立了相似的复制水平,这表明BA.1不需要hACE2或hTMPRSS2来感染小鼠。虽然感染Delta和BA.1的hACE2-KI小鼠的病毒负荷没有显著差异,但感染Delta的hACE2-KI小鼠表现出更大的组织病理学肺损伤和更高的sars - cov -2特异性CD4+和CD8+ T细胞反应(脾脏)和抗sars - cov -2刺突IgG滴度(血清)。此外,C57BL/6背景的hACE2-KI小鼠表现出比BALB/c更严重的肺部疾病和更强的Th1反应。这些结果将肺部疾病的严重程度与Th1显性免疫反应的程度联系起来,并为分析代表Th1显性与th2显性遗传背景的hACE2-KI小鼠的COVID-19发病机制奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges in the Development of NK-92 Cells as an Effective Universal Off-the-Shelf Cellular Therapeutic. Understanding the Role of miR-29a in the Regulation of RAG1, a Gene Associated with the Development of the Immune System. N-Glycan Branching Regulates BTLA Opposite to PD-1 to Limit T Cell Hyperactivity Induced by Branching Deficiency. Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 in Vaccine-naive Pregnant Women: Assessment of IgG and IgA Antibody Profile at Delivery and 42 Days Postpartum. Top Reads
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1