Disse index and free fatty acids as markers of insulin resistance and their association with hospital outcomes of coronary bypass surgery in patients with different glycemic status

IF 0.7 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes Mellitus Pub Date : 2023-02-10 DOI:10.14341/dm12869
N. Bezdenezhnykh, A. Sumin, A. Bezdenezhnykh, A. Kuzmina, A. Tsepokina, А. S. Pervushkina, S. T. Petrosyan, O. Barbarash
{"title":"Disse index and free fatty acids as markers of insulin resistance and their association with hospital outcomes of coronary bypass surgery in patients with different glycemic status","authors":"N. Bezdenezhnykh, A. Sumin, A. Bezdenezhnykh, A. Kuzmina, A. Tsepokina, А. S. Pervushkina, S. T. Petrosyan, O. Barbarash","doi":"10.14341/dm12869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM: to analyze various indices of insulin resistance and plasma free fatty acid (FFA) levels, and their association with the preoperative status and in-hospital complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in normoglycemic patients and patients with carbohydrate metabolism disorders (CMD).MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 708 patients who underwent CABG. The glycemic status, preoperative parameters, the specifics of surgical intervention, in-hospital complications were analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (n=266) — patients with CMD (type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and prediabetes); Group 2 (n=442) — patients without CMD. Plasma FFA and fasting plasma insulin levels were determined, the Disse index, the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), revised QUICKI were estimated in 383 patients.RESULTS: Screening prior to CABG increased the number of patients with T2DM from 15.2% to 24.1%, prediabetes – from 3.0% to 13.4%, with any CMD – from 18.2% to 37.5%.Patients with CMD showed a higher percentage of significant hospital complications (25.2% vs 17.0%, p=0.007), progression of renal failure (6.3% vs 2.9%, p=0.021), multiple organ failure (4.5% vs 1.7%, p=0.039), sternal wound complications (6.3% vs 2.9%, p=0.018), renal replacement therapy (3.7% vs 1.1%, p=0.020), surgery on peripheral arteries (1.5% vs 0%, p=0.039).According to the results of multivariate analysis, the Disse index turned out to be a significant predictor of the end point (hospital stay >10 days or any significant complication CABG) in several regression models (OR 1.060 in one of the models; 95% CI 1.016–1.105; p=0.006). Independent predictors of the end point were: female gender, age, body mass index, cardiopulmonary bypass duration, left atrium size, left ventricular end diastolic dimension, T2DM, FFA levels (OR 3.335; 95% CI 1.076–10.327; p=0.036), average postoperative glycemia on the 1st day after CABG, failure to achieve the target range of perioperative glycemia.CONCLUSION: Screening for CMD prior to CABG can significantly increase the number of patients with diagnosed CMD. Significant in-hospital complications after CABG tend to be more prevalent in patients with CMD compared with normoglycemic patients. Insulin resistance index Disse, FFA, postoperative glycemia are independent predictors of prolonged hospital stay or postoperative complications of CABG.","PeriodicalId":11327,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Mellitus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Mellitus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14341/dm12869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM: to analyze various indices of insulin resistance and plasma free fatty acid (FFA) levels, and their association with the preoperative status and in-hospital complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in normoglycemic patients and patients with carbohydrate metabolism disorders (CMD).MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 708 patients who underwent CABG. The glycemic status, preoperative parameters, the specifics of surgical intervention, in-hospital complications were analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (n=266) — patients with CMD (type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and prediabetes); Group 2 (n=442) — patients without CMD. Plasma FFA and fasting plasma insulin levels were determined, the Disse index, the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), revised QUICKI were estimated in 383 patients.RESULTS: Screening prior to CABG increased the number of patients with T2DM from 15.2% to 24.1%, prediabetes – from 3.0% to 13.4%, with any CMD – from 18.2% to 37.5%.Patients with CMD showed a higher percentage of significant hospital complications (25.2% vs 17.0%, p=0.007), progression of renal failure (6.3% vs 2.9%, p=0.021), multiple organ failure (4.5% vs 1.7%, p=0.039), sternal wound complications (6.3% vs 2.9%, p=0.018), renal replacement therapy (3.7% vs 1.1%, p=0.020), surgery on peripheral arteries (1.5% vs 0%, p=0.039).According to the results of multivariate analysis, the Disse index turned out to be a significant predictor of the end point (hospital stay >10 days or any significant complication CABG) in several regression models (OR 1.060 in one of the models; 95% CI 1.016–1.105; p=0.006). Independent predictors of the end point were: female gender, age, body mass index, cardiopulmonary bypass duration, left atrium size, left ventricular end diastolic dimension, T2DM, FFA levels (OR 3.335; 95% CI 1.076–10.327; p=0.036), average postoperative glycemia on the 1st day after CABG, failure to achieve the target range of perioperative glycemia.CONCLUSION: Screening for CMD prior to CABG can significantly increase the number of patients with diagnosed CMD. Significant in-hospital complications after CABG tend to be more prevalent in patients with CMD compared with normoglycemic patients. Insulin resistance index Disse, FFA, postoperative glycemia are independent predictors of prolonged hospital stay or postoperative complications of CABG.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疾病指数和游离脂肪酸作为胰岛素抵抗的标志物及其与不同血糖状态的冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的医院预后的关系
目的:分析血糖正常和碳水化合物代谢紊乱患者冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)术前状态及院内并发症与胰岛素抵抗、血浆游离脂肪酸(FFA)水平的关系。材料和方法:该研究包括708例接受CABG的患者。分析两组患者的血糖状况、术前参数、手术具体情况、院内并发症。将患者分为两组:第一组(266例)-合并CMD(2型糖尿病(T2DM)和糖尿病前期)的患者;第二组(n=442):无CMD患者。测定383例患者血浆FFA和空腹血浆胰岛素水平,测定Disse指数、定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数(QUICKI)、修正QUICKI。结果:CABG术前筛查使T2DM患者数量从15.2%增加到24.1%,糖尿病前期患者数量从3.0%增加到13.4%,伴有CMD的患者数量从18.2%增加到37.5%。CMD患者的显著医院并发症(25.2%比17.0%,p=0.007)、肾功能衰竭进展(6.3%比2.9%,p=0.021)、多器官功能衰竭(4.5%比1.7%,p=0.039)、胸骨伤口并发症(6.3%比2.9%,p=0.018)、肾脏替代治疗(3.7%比1.1%,p=0.020)、外周动脉手术(1.5%比0%,p=0.039)的比例较高。根据多变量分析结果,在多个回归模型中,Disse指数是终点(住院时间bbb10天或任何显著并发症CABG)的显著预测因子(其中一个模型or为1.060;95% ci 1.016-1.105;p = 0.006)。终点的独立预测因子为:女性性别、年龄、体重指数、体外循环时间、左心房大小、左室舒张末期尺寸、T2DM、FFA水平(OR 3.335;95% ci 1.076-10.327;p=0.036), CABG术后第1天平均血糖,未达到围手术期血糖目标范围。结论:冠脉搭桥前进行CMD筛查可显著增加确诊CMD患者的数量。与血糖正常的患者相比,CABG术后显著的院内并发症在CMD患者中更为普遍。胰岛素抵抗指数Disse、FFA、术后血糖是冠脉搭桥术后住院时间延长或并发症的独立预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Mellitus ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
40.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Time in range prediction using the experimental mobile application in type 1 diabetes Clinical prediction model for MODY type diabetes mellitus in children Remission of type 2 diabetes: opportunities of different nutrition styles Evaluation of the effect of testosterone replacement therapy with a transdermal testosterone on glycemic control in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus The impact of innovative glucose-lowering drugs on the course and outcome of COVID-19 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1