{"title":"“All poetry is born of play”: Spenser with Johan Huizinga","authors":"Abigail Shinn","doi":"10.1086/723163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture (1949) Johan Huizinga argues that “civilisation is, in its earliest phases, played,” and he sees this play as antithetical in nature, generated out of contrasts and competition. Viewing The Shepheardes Calender (1579) through the lens of Huizinga’s understanding of the play concept, I consider how Spenser uses antithetical cultural play in the form of contrasting classical and popular elements, to generate a new vision for English poetics. My analysis concentrates firstly on how the editor E.K. draws attention to, and misreads, cultural difference. This is followed by an examination of the August eclogue’s depiction of two contrasting visions for English song. Reading Spenser companionably with Huizinga helps us to see how difference can be generative of meaning in the poem, producing a hodgepodge in which a mixture of cultural types challenges the reader to imagine new possibilities for English poetry.","PeriodicalId":39606,"journal":{"name":"Spenser Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spenser Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/723163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture (1949) Johan Huizinga argues that “civilisation is, in its earliest phases, played,” and he sees this play as antithetical in nature, generated out of contrasts and competition. Viewing The Shepheardes Calender (1579) through the lens of Huizinga’s understanding of the play concept, I consider how Spenser uses antithetical cultural play in the form of contrasting classical and popular elements, to generate a new vision for English poetics. My analysis concentrates firstly on how the editor E.K. draws attention to, and misreads, cultural difference. This is followed by an examination of the August eclogue’s depiction of two contrasting visions for English song. Reading Spenser companionably with Huizinga helps us to see how difference can be generative of meaning in the poem, producing a hodgepodge in which a mixture of cultural types challenges the reader to imagine new possibilities for English poetry.
在《Ludens: A Study of the play - element In Culture》(1949)一书中,Johan Huizinga认为“文明在其最初阶段就是游戏”,他认为这种游戏本质上是对立的,产生于对比和竞争。通过惠伊津加对戏剧概念的理解来审视《牧羊人日历》(1579),我思考了斯宾塞如何以对比古典和流行元素的形式使用对立的文化游戏,从而为英国诗学创造了新的视野。我的分析首先集中在编辑E.K.如何引起对文化差异的注意和误读。接下来是八月牧歌对英语歌曲两种截然不同的愿景的描述。与惠伊津加一起阅读斯宾塞有助于我们了解差异如何在诗歌中产生意义,产生一种文化类型混合的大杂烩,挑战读者想象英语诗歌的新可能性。