A Study on Estimation of Degree of Compaction by Correction for Coarse Particle Ratio of Fill Material

IF 0.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.12814/JKGSS.2018.17.1.065
Yoo, Jaewon, Im Jong Chul, Seo Minsu, Changyoung Kim, Sang-Kyun Kang
{"title":"A Study on Estimation of Degree of Compaction by Correction for Coarse Particle Ratio of Fill Material","authors":"Yoo, Jaewon, Im Jong Chul, Seo Minsu, Changyoung Kim, Sang-Kyun Kang","doi":"10.12814/JKGSS.2018.17.1.065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The degree of compaction of embankments is generally measured using the sand replacement method or a soil density gauge. However, these methods include coarse particles, which are relatively large. The degree of compaction is overestimated if the in-situ soil density is simply compared with the density obtained from a Proctor compaction test (KS F 2312, 2001), because the density of coarse particles is higher than that of soil. However, there is no recommended correction for the coarse particle ratio in Korea, thus intentionally increasing the degree of compaction for structures to which large loads are applied or for which compaction is critical. Here, a correction considering the Korean Proctor compaction test and the difference between the maximum allowable particle sizes was recommended after corrections for coarse particle ratios in other countries were collected and analyzed. The degree of compaction was re-estimated by applying the recommended correction to the results of both Proctor compaction and sand replacement tests. The degree of compaction without the correction of coarse particle ratio was overestimated, because the re-estimated degree of compaction decreased as the coarse particle ratio increased. The relatively accurate results obtained from the field application of the correction will offer long-term cost savings due to reduced maintenance fees during operation.","PeriodicalId":42164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society","volume":"89 1","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12814/JKGSS.2018.17.1.065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The degree of compaction of embankments is generally measured using the sand replacement method or a soil density gauge. However, these methods include coarse particles, which are relatively large. The degree of compaction is overestimated if the in-situ soil density is simply compared with the density obtained from a Proctor compaction test (KS F 2312, 2001), because the density of coarse particles is higher than that of soil. However, there is no recommended correction for the coarse particle ratio in Korea, thus intentionally increasing the degree of compaction for structures to which large loads are applied or for which compaction is critical. Here, a correction considering the Korean Proctor compaction test and the difference between the maximum allowable particle sizes was recommended after corrections for coarse particle ratios in other countries were collected and analyzed. The degree of compaction was re-estimated by applying the recommended correction to the results of both Proctor compaction and sand replacement tests. The degree of compaction without the correction of coarse particle ratio was overestimated, because the re-estimated degree of compaction decreased as the coarse particle ratio increased. The relatively accurate results obtained from the field application of the correction will offer long-term cost savings due to reduced maintenance fees during operation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用填土粗粒比修正估算压实度的研究
堤防的压实程度一般采用换砂法或土壤密度计测量。然而,这些方法包括相对较大的粗颗粒。如果简单地将原位土壤密度与Proctor压实试验(KS F 2312, 2001)获得的密度进行比较,则会高估压实程度,因为粗颗粒的密度高于土壤的密度。然而,韩国没有建议对粗颗粒比进行修正,因此有意增加施加大载荷或对压实至关重要的结构的压实程度。这里,在收集和分析了其他国家粗颗粒比的修正后,建议考虑韩国的Proctor压实试验和最大允许粒径之间的差异进行修正。通过对Proctor压实和换砂试验的结果应用建议的修正,重新估计了压实程度。未校正粗粒比的压实度被高估,因为随着粗粒比的增加,重新估计的压实度减小。由于减少了作业期间的维护费用,现场校正获得的相对准确的结果将节省长期成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Field Applicability of Slope of Improved Soil for Ground Stabilizer Analysis of the Correlation between the velocity speed of High-Speed Railways and the Suppressing Effect of lateral Displacement of retaining wall according to the Arrangement of Stabilizing Piles Behavioral Characteristics and Safety Management Plan for Fill Dam During Water Level Fluctuation Using Numerical Analysis Application of Laboratory Pressurized Vane Shear Test and Discrete Element Method for Determination of Foam-conditioned Soil Properties Development and Reliability Verification of Quality Control System for Compaction Grouting Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1