Evaluation of Leading Safety Performance of Primary School Buildings in Alexandria, Egypt: Cross-Sectional Study

G. Zaki, K. Tayel, M. Reda, A. H. Mahmoud, Engy Labib
{"title":"Evaluation of Leading Safety Performance of Primary School Buildings in Alexandria, Egypt: Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"G. Zaki, K. Tayel, M. Reda, A. H. Mahmoud, Engy Labib","doi":"10.21608/jhiph.2018.19913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Unsafe school buildings may adversely affect students, teachers, administrative workers, cleaning workers, and visitors. Objective(s): The aim of the present study was to evaluate the leading safety performance of public, private, and experimental primary school buildings in Alexandria, Egypt. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 30 primary schools in Alexandria selected by stratified cluster sampling. Two observational checklists were designed, validated, and used; including school building safety inspection checklist (SBSIC), and classroom safety inspection checklist (CSIC). The completed checklists were reviewed and coded. The safety performances (SP) for each category and for the overall checklists were then calculated. Results: The SP in private primary schools and classrooms [(66.1±13.0%), (68.7±12.5)] were higher than that of experimental [(59.9±14.0%), (65.1±14.2%)] and public ones [(39.3±7.8%), (46.0±11.8%) respectively]. The most common causes of reduced school SP were \"the absence of protective measures against vectors & insects,\" \"the non-daily refuse disposal,\" \"the non-inspected play areas.\" Other causes included \"the irregular fire drills,\" \"the absence of the alarm system,\" \"the non-earthed electrical equipment,\" \"the absence of emergency plan,\" and \"the unmarked tripping/slipping locations.\" The most frequent unsafe classroom conditions were \"the absence of classroom alarm point,\" \"the on-board glare,\" and \"the non-compliant windows to class area ratios.\" Conclusion: Many safety violations were found to occur in Alexandria primary schools. This would cause a reduction of the safety performance and consequently a lack of safety management. Safety performance in private schools was better than that in experimental and public ones.","PeriodicalId":34256,"journal":{"name":"Journal of High Institute of Public Health","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of High Institute of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jhiph.2018.19913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Unsafe school buildings may adversely affect students, teachers, administrative workers, cleaning workers, and visitors. Objective(s): The aim of the present study was to evaluate the leading safety performance of public, private, and experimental primary school buildings in Alexandria, Egypt. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 30 primary schools in Alexandria selected by stratified cluster sampling. Two observational checklists were designed, validated, and used; including school building safety inspection checklist (SBSIC), and classroom safety inspection checklist (CSIC). The completed checklists were reviewed and coded. The safety performances (SP) for each category and for the overall checklists were then calculated. Results: The SP in private primary schools and classrooms [(66.1±13.0%), (68.7±12.5)] were higher than that of experimental [(59.9±14.0%), (65.1±14.2%)] and public ones [(39.3±7.8%), (46.0±11.8%) respectively]. The most common causes of reduced school SP were "the absence of protective measures against vectors & insects," "the non-daily refuse disposal," "the non-inspected play areas." Other causes included "the irregular fire drills," "the absence of the alarm system," "the non-earthed electrical equipment," "the absence of emergency plan," and "the unmarked tripping/slipping locations." The most frequent unsafe classroom conditions were "the absence of classroom alarm point," "the on-board glare," and "the non-compliant windows to class area ratios." Conclusion: Many safety violations were found to occur in Alexandria primary schools. This would cause a reduction of the safety performance and consequently a lack of safety management. Safety performance in private schools was better than that in experimental and public ones.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃及亚历山大市小学建筑领先安全性能评价:横断面研究
背景:不安全的学校建筑可能对学生、教师、行政人员、清洁工人和访客产生不利影响。目的:本研究的目的是评估埃及亚历山大市公立、私立和实验小学建筑的领先安全性能。方法:采用分层整群抽样的方法对亚历山大市30所小学进行横断面调查。设计、验证并使用了两份观察性检查表;包括学校建筑安全检查清单(SBSIC)和教室安全检查清单(CSIC)。对完成的检查表进行了审查和编码。然后计算每个类别和总体清单的安全性能(SP)。结果:私立小学和教室的SP[(66.1±13.0%),(68.7±12.5)]高于实验小学[(59.9±14.0%),(65.1±14.2%)]和公立小学[(39.3±7.8%),(46.0±11.8%)]。学校SP降低的最常见原因是“缺乏针对病媒和昆虫的保护措施”,“非日常垃圾处理”,“未经检查的游乐区”。其他原因包括“不定期的消防演习”、“没有报警系统”、“未接地的电气设备”、“缺乏应急计划”和“未标记的跳闸/滑倒位置”。最常见的不安全教室条件是“没有教室报警点”、“车上的眩光”和“窗户与教室面积的比例不符合要求”。结论:亚历山德里亚小学发生了许多安全违规行为。这将导致安全性能的降低,从而导致安全管理的缺乏。私立学校的安全绩效优于实验学校和公立学校。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Economic Evaluation for Health Interventions: Narrative Review Mental Distress and Fears and Their Association with Health Care Access and Non-Adherence of Patients with Cancer to Treatment during COVID-19 Pandemic Mental Distress and Fears and Their Association with Health Care Access and Non-Adherence of Patients with Cancer to Treatment during COVID-19 Pandemic How Physically Active are University Students in Saudi Arabia? Assessment and Implementation of Pre-Requisite Programs in a Dairy Products Plant in Gaza Strip, Palestine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1