Critical Comparison on Safety Management Systems, Identifying Opportunities for Companies Manufacturing and using Hazardous Substances

IF 0.6 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.7906/indecs.21.1.9
Joseph Lakatos, Á. Drégelyi-Kiss
{"title":"Critical Comparison on Safety Management Systems, Identifying Opportunities for Companies Manufacturing and using Hazardous Substances","authors":"Joseph Lakatos, Á. Drégelyi-Kiss","doi":"10.7906/indecs.21.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the life of companies operating with hazardous substances, the daily task is to maintain the safety on a high level and to introduce actions to increase safety performance. The companies covered by the Disaster Prevention Act have a special task, to operate a safety management system that also satisfies industrial safety aspects. To make this as efficient as possible, good practices from other safety management systems can be built into the currently used management system at the company. Perhaps the most frequently operated safety management systems for organizations producing and processing hazardous substances are the Occupational Health and Safety Management according to the ISO 45001 standard and the Process Safety Management systems. A comparison of the latter with what is required by law points to several points that may designate areas for improvement in the certified safety management system. In this way, they provide a basis for the development of a new system, that complying with the prescribed requirements, helps to maintain a high level of safety, to prevent the occurrence of accidents, and to work with safety-conscious employees and suppliers.","PeriodicalId":54126,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.21.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the life of companies operating with hazardous substances, the daily task is to maintain the safety on a high level and to introduce actions to increase safety performance. The companies covered by the Disaster Prevention Act have a special task, to operate a safety management system that also satisfies industrial safety aspects. To make this as efficient as possible, good practices from other safety management systems can be built into the currently used management system at the company. Perhaps the most frequently operated safety management systems for organizations producing and processing hazardous substances are the Occupational Health and Safety Management according to the ISO 45001 standard and the Process Safety Management systems. A comparison of the latter with what is required by law points to several points that may designate areas for improvement in the certified safety management system. In this way, they provide a basis for the development of a new system, that complying with the prescribed requirements, helps to maintain a high level of safety, to prevent the occurrence of accidents, and to work with safety-conscious employees and suppliers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全管理系统的关键比较,识别制造和使用有害物质的公司的机会
在经营有害物质的公司的生命中,日常任务是保持高水平的安全,并采取措施提高安全绩效。《灾害防治法》规定的企业有一项特殊任务,即运营符合产业安全要求的安全管理体系。为了使其尽可能高效,可以将其他安全管理系统的良好实践纳入公司当前使用的管理系统。对于生产和加工有害物质的组织来说,最常用的安全管理体系可能是基于ISO 45001标准的职业健康与安全管理体系和过程安全管理体系。将后者与法律要求进行比较,可以指出经认证的安全管理体系中需要改进的几个方面。这样,它们为开发符合规定要求的新系统提供了基础,有助于保持高水平的安全,防止事故的发生,并与具有安全意识的员工和供应商合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of Dace-Kriging Metamodel Collapsing the Complicated/Complex Distinction: It’s Complexity all the Way Down Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity: Jan Cornelius Schmidt’s Critical-reflexive Problem-oriented Interdisciplinarity Methodological and Health Reasons for Unsuccessful Biometric Identification Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises’ Perceptions of the Use of Cloud Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1