Invasive Non-Arthroplasty Treatment Options for Knee Osteoarthritis: Review

Rohan Reddy, YuChia Wang, R. Scully, S. Thakkar
{"title":"Invasive Non-Arthroplasty Treatment Options for Knee Osteoarthritis: Review","authors":"Rohan Reddy, YuChia Wang, R. Scully, S. Thakkar","doi":"10.13107/jcorth.2023.v08i01.549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most common joint diseases in the world, such that there exists a variety of treatment methods, ranging from conservative treatments such as physical therapy and weight loss to total replacement of the diseased joint. Invasive non-arthroplasty treatment methods are growing in popularity and this review aims to explore the current literature. Better understanding of these alternatives could allow orthopedic surgeons and primary care providers to offer poor arthroplasty candidates meaningful symptomatic relief. Materials and Methods: A literature review using PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS was performed to examine the following invasive non-arthroplasty treatment options: Corticosteroid injections (CS), viscosupplementation, platelet-rich plasma injections, stem cell injections, ozone therapy, prolotherapy, radiofrequency nerve ablation (RFA), arthroscopy, and osteotomy. Articles with complete data on the outcomes following these treatment methods were included in the study. Results: CSs showed strong efficacy in providing short-term pain relief, while viscosupplementation and platelet-rich plasma have shown to be effective in long-term management as well. Aside from the more common injectable treatment options, newer options such as stem cell injection and ozone therapy have shown clinical efficacy while prolotherapy and RFA are still early-stage treatment options. Still, further studies are required to better assess these emerging therapies. Operatively, arthroscopic surgery has shown to be minimally effective while osteotomy demonstrated effective pain and functional improvement. Conclusion: Multiple therapeutic options exist for invasive management of KOA to a different degree of effectiveness and efficacy. We have analyzed the outcomes of multiple invasive non-arthroplasty treatment options for KOA. This review can better inform patients and surgeons of the pros and cons of different KOA treatment methods. Newer conservative options may have positive clinical implications but will require further investigation. Operative alternatives to arthroplasty can provide symptomatic relief but may increase the associated risk and complexity should the need for arthroplasty ever arises. Keywords: Total knee arthroplasty, injections, radiofrequency nerve ablation, arthroscopy, osteotomy.","PeriodicalId":15476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jcorth.2023.v08i01.549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most common joint diseases in the world, such that there exists a variety of treatment methods, ranging from conservative treatments such as physical therapy and weight loss to total replacement of the diseased joint. Invasive non-arthroplasty treatment methods are growing in popularity and this review aims to explore the current literature. Better understanding of these alternatives could allow orthopedic surgeons and primary care providers to offer poor arthroplasty candidates meaningful symptomatic relief. Materials and Methods: A literature review using PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS was performed to examine the following invasive non-arthroplasty treatment options: Corticosteroid injections (CS), viscosupplementation, platelet-rich plasma injections, stem cell injections, ozone therapy, prolotherapy, radiofrequency nerve ablation (RFA), arthroscopy, and osteotomy. Articles with complete data on the outcomes following these treatment methods were included in the study. Results: CSs showed strong efficacy in providing short-term pain relief, while viscosupplementation and platelet-rich plasma have shown to be effective in long-term management as well. Aside from the more common injectable treatment options, newer options such as stem cell injection and ozone therapy have shown clinical efficacy while prolotherapy and RFA are still early-stage treatment options. Still, further studies are required to better assess these emerging therapies. Operatively, arthroscopic surgery has shown to be minimally effective while osteotomy demonstrated effective pain and functional improvement. Conclusion: Multiple therapeutic options exist for invasive management of KOA to a different degree of effectiveness and efficacy. We have analyzed the outcomes of multiple invasive non-arthroplasty treatment options for KOA. This review can better inform patients and surgeons of the pros and cons of different KOA treatment methods. Newer conservative options may have positive clinical implications but will require further investigation. Operative alternatives to arthroplasty can provide symptomatic relief but may increase the associated risk and complexity should the need for arthroplasty ever arises. Keywords: Total knee arthroplasty, injections, radiofrequency nerve ablation, arthroscopy, osteotomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节骨关节炎的侵入性非关节成形术治疗方案:综述
膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)是世界上最常见的关节疾病之一,治疗方法多种多样,既有物理治疗、减肥等保守治疗,也有病变关节的全置换。侵入性非关节置换术治疗方法越来越受欢迎,本综述旨在探讨目前的文献。更好地了解这些替代方案可以让骨科医生和初级保健提供者提供有意义的不良关节置换候选人症状缓解。材料和方法:使用PubMed, Google Scholar和SCOPUS进行文献回顾,以检查以下侵入性非关节成形术治疗方案:皮质类固醇注射(CS),粘剂补充,富血小板血浆注射,干细胞注射,臭氧治疗,前体治疗,射频神经消融(RFA),关节镜检查和截骨术。本研究纳入了对这些治疗方法的结果有完整数据的文章。结果:CSs在提供短期疼痛缓解方面显示出强大的疗效,而补充粘胶和富血小板血浆在长期治疗方面也显示出有效的效果。除了更常见的注射治疗方案外,干细胞注射和臭氧治疗等较新的治疗方案已显示出临床疗效,而前驱疗法和RFA仍是早期治疗方案。不过,需要进一步的研究来更好地评估这些新兴疗法。手术方面,关节镜手术已显示出最低限度的效果,而截骨术显示出有效的疼痛和功能改善。结论:有创治疗KOA有多种治疗方案,疗效不同。我们分析了KOA的多种有创非关节置换术治疗方案的结果。本综述可以更好地告知患者和外科医生不同KOA治疗方法的优缺点。较新的保守选择可能有积极的临床意义,但需要进一步的研究。手术替代关节置换术可以缓解症状,但如果需要进行关节置换术,可能会增加相关的风险和复杂性。关键词:全膝关节置换术,注射,射频神经消融,关节镜,截骨术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Giant Cell Tumor of FDP Tendon Sheath in Young: A Rare Case Report Setting the Standard of Care – Ponseti Casting for Club Feet Non Standard Deviation – Managing angular deformities around the knee in young age Burnout in COVID-19 Residency Gout Arthritis Progression in Treatment with Herbal Therapy: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1