Thrombectomy for distal medium vessel occlusion stroke: Combined vs. single-device techniques - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in stroke Pub Date : 2023-01-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fstro.2023.1126130
Enver De Wei Loh, Gabriel Yi Ren Kwok, Keith Zhi Xian Toh, Ming Yi Koh, Yao Hao Teo, Yao Neng Teo, Bernard P L Chan, Vijay Kumar Sharma, Megan Bi-Jia Ng, Hui Shi Lim, Betsy Soon, Anil Gopinathan, Cunli Yang, Ching-Hui Sia, Pervinder Bhogal, Patrick A Brouwer, Lukas Meyer, Jens Fiehler, Tommy Andersson, Benjamin Y Q Tan, Leonard L L Yeo
{"title":"Thrombectomy for distal medium vessel occlusion stroke: Combined vs. single-device techniques - A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Enver De Wei Loh, Gabriel Yi Ren Kwok, Keith Zhi Xian Toh, Ming Yi Koh, Yao Hao Teo, Yao Neng Teo, Bernard P L Chan, Vijay Kumar Sharma, Megan Bi-Jia Ng, Hui Shi Lim, Betsy Soon, Anil Gopinathan, Cunli Yang, Ching-Hui Sia, Pervinder Bhogal, Patrick A Brouwer, Lukas Meyer, Jens Fiehler, Tommy Andersson, Benjamin Y Q Tan, Leonard L L Yeo","doi":"10.3389/fstro.2023.1126130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal mechanical thrombectomy technique for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) caused by distal, medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) is uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of first-line thrombectomy with combined techniques, which entail simultaneous use of a stent retriever and aspiration catheter, vs. single-device techniques, whether stent retriever or direct aspiration alone, for DMVO-AIS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from inception until 2 September 2022 for studies comparing combined and single-device techniques in DMVO-AIS patients. We adopted the Distal Thrombectomy Summit Group's definition of DMVO. Our outcomes were the modified first-pass effect [mFPE; modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b-3 at first-pass], first-pass effect (FPE; mTICI 2c-3 at first-pass), successful and complete final reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3 and 2c-3 at end of all procedures, respectively), 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin scale 0-2), 90-day mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were included, with 477 patients receiving combined techniques, and 670 patients receiving single-device thrombectomy. Combined techniques achieved significantly higher odds of mFPE [odds ratio (OR), 2.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-4.02; <i>p</i> = 0.021] and FPE (OR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.97-6.38; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with lower odds of sICH (OR, 0.23; 95% CI 0.06-0.93; <i>p</i> = 0.040). There were no significant differences in final reperfusion, functional independence (OR, 1.19; 95% CI 0.87-1.63; <i>p</i> = 0.658), or mortality (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.50-1.76; <i>p</i> = 0.850).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In DMVO-AIS patients, mechanical thrombectomy combining stent retrievers and aspiration catheters achieved higher odds of FPE and lower odds of sICH over single-device techniques. There were no differences in functional independence and mortality. Further trials are warranted to establish these findings.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_recor d.php?ID=CRD42022370160, identifier: CRD42022370160.</p>","PeriodicalId":73108,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in stroke","volume":"65 1","pages":"1126130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fstro.2023.1126130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal mechanical thrombectomy technique for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) caused by distal, medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) is uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of first-line thrombectomy with combined techniques, which entail simultaneous use of a stent retriever and aspiration catheter, vs. single-device techniques, whether stent retriever or direct aspiration alone, for DMVO-AIS patients.

Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from inception until 2 September 2022 for studies comparing combined and single-device techniques in DMVO-AIS patients. We adopted the Distal Thrombectomy Summit Group's definition of DMVO. Our outcomes were the modified first-pass effect [mFPE; modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b-3 at first-pass], first-pass effect (FPE; mTICI 2c-3 at first-pass), successful and complete final reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3 and 2c-3 at end of all procedures, respectively), 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin scale 0-2), 90-day mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

Results: Nine studies were included, with 477 patients receiving combined techniques, and 670 patients receiving single-device thrombectomy. Combined techniques achieved significantly higher odds of mFPE [odds ratio (OR), 2.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-4.02; p = 0.021] and FPE (OR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.97-6.38; p < 0.001), with lower odds of sICH (OR, 0.23; 95% CI 0.06-0.93; p = 0.040). There were no significant differences in final reperfusion, functional independence (OR, 1.19; 95% CI 0.87-1.63; p = 0.658), or mortality (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.50-1.76; p = 0.850).

Conclusions: In DMVO-AIS patients, mechanical thrombectomy combining stent retrievers and aspiration catheters achieved higher odds of FPE and lower odds of sICH over single-device techniques. There were no differences in functional independence and mortality. Further trials are warranted to establish these findings.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_recor d.php?ID=CRD42022370160, identifier: CRD42022370160.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远端中血管闭塞性卒中的血栓切除术:联合与单一装置技术-系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:远端、中端血管闭塞(DMVO)引起的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的最佳机械取栓技术尚不确定。我们对DMVO-AIS患者进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估一线联合技术取栓的有效性和安全性,联合技术需要同时使用支架取栓器和抽吸导管,与单装置技术相比,无论是支架取栓器还是单独直接抽吸。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL数据库,从建立到2022年9月2日,比较DMVO-AIS患者的联合和单一设备技术的研究。我们采用远端取栓高峰小组对DMVO的定义。我们的研究结果是改良首过效应[mFPE;改良脑梗死溶血栓(mTICI) (2b-3),首过效应(FPE; mTICI 2c-3),最终再灌注成功和完全(所有手术结束时分别为mTICI 2b-3和2c-3), 90天功能独立性(改良Rankin量表0-2),90天死亡率,症状性颅内出血(sICH)。结果:纳入9项研究,477例患者接受联合技术,670例患者接受单装置取栓。联合技术可显著提高mFPE的发生率[比值比(OR), 2.12;95%置信区间(CI), 1.12-4.02;p = 0.021]和FPE (OR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.97-6.38; p < 0.001), sICH的发生率较低(OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.93; p = 0.040)。两组在最终再灌注、功能独立性(OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.87-1.63; p = 0.658)和死亡率(OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.50-1.76; p = 0.850)方面无显著差异。结论:在DMVO-AIS患者中,机械取栓联合支架回收器和抽吸导管比单一装置技术获得更高的FPE几率和更低的siich几率。功能独立性和死亡率无差异。需要进一步的试验来证实这些发现。系统评审注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_recor d.p p?ID=CRD42022370160,标识符:CRD42022370160。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The APOE paradox: divergent genetic influences on hemorrhagic stroke risk-A meta-analysis. Role of C-reactive protein and fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing as early markers of stroke-associated pneumonia. Comprehensive immunological profiling of acute ischemic stroke during mechanical thrombectomy: myeloid cell activation and molecular signatures in blood and thrombus. Sex as a predictor and moderator of psychosocial determinants of cardiometabolic risks for Métis People in Canada. Is early thrombectomy of proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion to salvage internal capsule associated with improved clinical outcomes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1