Book Review: Magdalena de Cao: An Early Colonial Town on the North Coast of Peru by Jeffery Quilter

IF 0.7 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY NORTH AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGIST Pub Date : 2021-10-11 DOI:10.1177/01976931211048208
Mark R. Barnes, PhD.
{"title":"Book Review: Magdalena de Cao: An Early Colonial Town on the North Coast of Peru by Jeffery Quilter","authors":"Mark R. Barnes, PhD.","doi":"10.1177/01976931211048208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1976, I co-authored an article on the Guevaví Mission site, founded in 1701, as one of the northernmost Jesuit missions in the American Southwest (Robinson and Barnes, 1976). My contribution to this article was the description and analysis of the material culture recovered in archaeological investigations (1964–1966). Like many other southwestern Spanish colonial mission sites, Guevaví had been the target of “treasure hunting,” casual surface collecting of artifacts, and post-Jesuit occupation disturbance, so “only broken, worn, or lost items remained” (Robinson and Barnes, 1976). Slightly more than 5,000 pieces of Native American pottery were recovered in excavations, but how much of this material preor post-dated this eighteenth century Jesuit mission was unknown. All of the imported ceramics (Mexico, Spain, and China), broken glass and beads, and metal fragments fit neatly into three archival drawers in the Arizona State Museum and did not exceed 100 items, or one half of one percent of the total number of recovered artifacts. As an archaeologist who has specialized in the research of Spanish colonial material culture, I was most interested in reviewing Jeffrey Quilter’s work on the colonial town and church of Magdalena de Cao along the Pacific coast of Peru to see how artifacts recovered from South America missions compared to those of North America. The differences between Magdalena de Cao and Guevaví were readily apparent in terms of size of occupation, environment, and the amount and variety of artifacts. Magdalena de Cao was originally the site of a major prehistoric Moche town and monumental huaca or earthen mound complex, located on the El Brujo Terrace adjacent to the Pacific Ocean. Decades of archaeological investigations on sites on this terrace was the basis for the development of a tourist facility, as this area appears to have been continuously occupied for as long as 14,000 years, and where in the last Book Review","PeriodicalId":43677,"journal":{"name":"NORTH AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGIST","volume":"30 1","pages":"177 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NORTH AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGIST","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01976931211048208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1976, I co-authored an article on the Guevaví Mission site, founded in 1701, as one of the northernmost Jesuit missions in the American Southwest (Robinson and Barnes, 1976). My contribution to this article was the description and analysis of the material culture recovered in archaeological investigations (1964–1966). Like many other southwestern Spanish colonial mission sites, Guevaví had been the target of “treasure hunting,” casual surface collecting of artifacts, and post-Jesuit occupation disturbance, so “only broken, worn, or lost items remained” (Robinson and Barnes, 1976). Slightly more than 5,000 pieces of Native American pottery were recovered in excavations, but how much of this material preor post-dated this eighteenth century Jesuit mission was unknown. All of the imported ceramics (Mexico, Spain, and China), broken glass and beads, and metal fragments fit neatly into three archival drawers in the Arizona State Museum and did not exceed 100 items, or one half of one percent of the total number of recovered artifacts. As an archaeologist who has specialized in the research of Spanish colonial material culture, I was most interested in reviewing Jeffrey Quilter’s work on the colonial town and church of Magdalena de Cao along the Pacific coast of Peru to see how artifacts recovered from South America missions compared to those of North America. The differences between Magdalena de Cao and Guevaví were readily apparent in terms of size of occupation, environment, and the amount and variety of artifacts. Magdalena de Cao was originally the site of a major prehistoric Moche town and monumental huaca or earthen mound complex, located on the El Brujo Terrace adjacent to the Pacific Ocean. Decades of archaeological investigations on sites on this terrace was the basis for the development of a tourist facility, as this area appears to have been continuously occupied for as long as 14,000 years, and where in the last Book Review
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:马格达莱纳德曹:秘鲁北部海岸的一个早期殖民小镇杰弗里·奎尔特著
1976年,我与人合作撰写了一篇关于Guevaví传教网站的文章,该网站成立于1701年,是美国西南部最北的耶稣会传教会之一(Robinson and Barnes, 1976)。我对这篇文章的贡献是对考古调查中发现的物质文化(1964-1966)的描述和分析。像许多其他西南西班牙殖民传教地点一样,Guevaví曾经是“寻宝”的目标,偶尔在地面收集文物,以及耶稣会占领后的骚乱,所以“只有破碎,磨损或丢失的物品留下来”(Robinson和Barnes, 1976)。在挖掘中发现了5000多件美洲原住民陶器,但这些材料在18世纪耶稣会传教之前或之后有多少是未知的。所有进口的陶瓷(墨西哥、西班牙和中国)、破碎的玻璃和珠子以及金属碎片整齐地放在亚利桑那州立博物馆的三个档案抽屉里,不超过100件,占回收文物总数的0.5%。作为一名专门研究西班牙殖民物质文化的考古学家,我最感兴趣的是回顾杰弗里·奎尔特(Jeffrey Quilter)关于秘鲁太平洋沿岸马格达莱纳河(Magdalena de Cao)殖民城镇和教堂的工作,看看从南美任务中恢复的文物与北美任务相比如何。Magdalena de Cao和Guevaví之间的差异在职业规模、环境以及人工制品的数量和种类方面很明显。Magdalena de Cao最初是一个主要的史前莫切镇和巨大的瓦卡或土丘建筑群的所在地,位于毗邻太平洋的El Brujo露台上。数十年的考古调查是开发旅游设施的基础,因为这个地区似乎已经连续被占领了长达14,000年,在最近的书评中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Published quarterly, this is the only general journal dedicated solely to North America—with total coverage of archaeological activity in the United States, Canada, and Northern Mexico (excluding Mesoamerica). The North American Archaeologist surveys all aspects of prehistoric and historic archaeology within an evolutionary perspective, from Paleo-Indian studies to industrial sites. It accents the results of Resource Management and Contract Archaeology, the newest growth areas in archaeology, often neglected in other publications. The Journal regularly and reliably publishes work based on activities in state, provincial and local archaeological societies.
期刊最新文献
A brief history of bison zooarchaeological research in eastern Washington Resituating the deep history of the Chesapeake Kiskiak: The settlement history of a dispersed village in Tidewater Virginia Climate-conscious archaeology: contextualizing drought and history in the Chesapeake Archaeology and Applied Anthropology as a Collaborative Approach to Decolonization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1