The Sozialer Rechsstaat as a reference for privacy right and data protections laws in German jurisprudence

Q4 Social Sciences International Journal of Private Law Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1504/IJPL.2015.076601
Alejandro Laje
{"title":"The Sozialer Rechsstaat as a reference for privacy right and data protections laws in German jurisprudence","authors":"Alejandro Laje","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2015.076601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Privacy right is generally based on individualistic arguments, however the solidarity principle must apply, providing privacy right a social approach. This paper argues that such understanding is found in the rulings of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany and analysis relevant evidence in that regard. It concludes that the right of information self-determination in Germany is set within its proper social place, where the person must be able to maintain his/her autonomy in a context defined socially, and remain responsible for the general good.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"22 1","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2015.076601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Privacy right is generally based on individualistic arguments, however the solidarity principle must apply, providing privacy right a social approach. This paper argues that such understanding is found in the rulings of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany and analysis relevant evidence in that regard. It concludes that the right of information self-determination in Germany is set within its proper social place, where the person must be able to maintain his/her autonomy in a context defined socially, and remain responsible for the general good.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国隐私权和数据保护法律的判例参考
隐私权一般以个人主义论证为基础,但必须适用团结原则,为隐私权提供一种社会性的途径。本文认为这种认识在德国联邦宪法法院的判决中有所体现,并对相关证据进行了分析。它的结论是,在德国,信息自决权被置于其适当的社会地位,在那里,个人必须能够在社会定义的背景下保持他/她的自主权,并对普遍利益负责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
The evolution of the non-oral modification clause Legal regulation of migration policy in EU countries: current challenges The application of the concept of consideration to smart contracts on a blockchain. The propriety of mandatory arbitration in Nigeria vis-à-vis the doctrine of voluntariness: the imperativeness of charting a new course The evolution of the non-oral modification clause
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1