Use of Silicon Vaginal Pessary for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Afroza Akther Mazumder, S. Begum, N. Yousuf
{"title":"Use of Silicon Vaginal Pessary for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse","authors":"Afroza Akther Mazumder, S. Begum, N. Yousuf","doi":"10.3329/jcmcta.v33i1.67286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Use of vaginal pessary as a conservative therapy for pelvic organ prolapse is very common and upto 77% of clinicians uses ring pessary for 1 line management of prolapse. Aim to treat prolapse by conservative approach is to alleviate the symptoms of prolapse and avert or delay the need for surgery. Aim of this study was to find out improvements of symptoms related to pelvic organ prolapse and satisfaction rate after 3 months of using vaginal pessary.   \nMaterials and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from January 2019 –to June 2019 in the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Bangabandu Memorial Hospital, Chattogram. Total 31 patients were included with symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) willing to use pessary. Primary outcome were improvement of symptoms and their satisfaction from baseline to 3 months.   \nResults: Age of the respondents were between 25-80 years with a mean of 50 ( +-12) years, maximum respondents were postmenopausal 54.8% .Out of 31 respondents 27(87.1%) continue pessary use upto 3 months and their after, 2(6.5%) cases spontaneous expulsion took place, 2(6.5%) discontinue the use. Compare with base line findings significant improvement in patients symptoms were observed at 3 months. Nearly all symptoms related to pelvic organ prolapse resolved from baseline to to 3 months: buldge (92.3% to 7.7% , p < 0.001), dragging pain in lower abdomen (100% to 14.8% , p<0.001). Urinary symptoms voiding difficulty improved in 88% ( p<0.001), urinary urgency improved in 81.8% (p<0.001), urge and stress incontinence improved in 100% (p<0.001). Incomplete empting of bowel improved in 100%(p<0.001). During follow up 4(12.9%) women complain of vaginal discharge. At 3months 88.9% women were satisfied with pessary and 3(11.1%) were dissatisfied.   \nConclusion: This study showed that treatment with use of ring pessary in women with pelvic organ prolapse had significant improvements in the symptoms with high satisfaction rate.   \nJCMCTA 2022 ; 33 (1) : 118-123","PeriodicalId":93458,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers' Association","volume":"127 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jcmcta.v33i1.67286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Use of vaginal pessary as a conservative therapy for pelvic organ prolapse is very common and upto 77% of clinicians uses ring pessary for 1 line management of prolapse. Aim to treat prolapse by conservative approach is to alleviate the symptoms of prolapse and avert or delay the need for surgery. Aim of this study was to find out improvements of symptoms related to pelvic organ prolapse and satisfaction rate after 3 months of using vaginal pessary.   Materials and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from January 2019 –to June 2019 in the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Bangabandu Memorial Hospital, Chattogram. Total 31 patients were included with symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) willing to use pessary. Primary outcome were improvement of symptoms and their satisfaction from baseline to 3 months.   Results: Age of the respondents were between 25-80 years with a mean of 50 ( +-12) years, maximum respondents were postmenopausal 54.8% .Out of 31 respondents 27(87.1%) continue pessary use upto 3 months and their after, 2(6.5%) cases spontaneous expulsion took place, 2(6.5%) discontinue the use. Compare with base line findings significant improvement in patients symptoms were observed at 3 months. Nearly all symptoms related to pelvic organ prolapse resolved from baseline to to 3 months: buldge (92.3% to 7.7% , p < 0.001), dragging pain in lower abdomen (100% to 14.8% , p<0.001). Urinary symptoms voiding difficulty improved in 88% ( p<0.001), urinary urgency improved in 81.8% (p<0.001), urge and stress incontinence improved in 100% (p<0.001). Incomplete empting of bowel improved in 100%(p<0.001). During follow up 4(12.9%) women complain of vaginal discharge. At 3months 88.9% women were satisfied with pessary and 3(11.1%) were dissatisfied.   Conclusion: This study showed that treatment with use of ring pessary in women with pelvic organ prolapse had significant improvements in the symptoms with high satisfaction rate.   JCMCTA 2022 ; 33 (1) : 118-123
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴道硅托在盆腔器官脱垂治疗中的应用
背景:使用阴道阴道托作为盆腔器官脱垂的保守治疗是非常常见的,高达77%的临床医生使用环子宫托进行1线脱垂治疗。保守治疗脱垂的目的是减轻脱垂的症状,避免或延迟手术的需要。本研究的目的是了解使用阴道托具3个月后盆腔器官脱垂相关症状的改善情况及满意度。材料与方法:2019年1月- 2019年6月在Chattogram邦班班杜纪念医院妇产科进行前瞻性观察研究。共有31例有症状的盆腔器官脱垂(POP)患者愿意使用子宫托。主要结局是症状的改善和从基线到3个月的满意度。结果:受访者年龄在25-80岁之间,平均50(+-12)岁,绝经后最多占54.8%。31名受访者中27例(87.1%)持续使用子宫托3个月,其中2例(6.5%)发生自然排出,2例(6.5%)停止使用。与基线结果相比,3个月时观察到患者症状显著改善。从基线到3个月,几乎所有与盆腔器官脱垂相关的症状都消失了:肿胀(92.3%至7.7%,p<0.001),下腹部拖痛(100%至14.8%,p<0.001)。泌尿系统症状排尿困难改善率为88% (p<0.001),尿急改善率为81.8% (p<0.001),尿急和压力性尿失禁改善率为100% (p<0.001)。肠道不完全排空改善率为100%(p<0.001)。在随访期间,4名(12.9%)妇女抱怨阴道分泌物。3个月时,88.9%的妇女对子宫托满意,3名妇女(11.1%)不满意。结论:应用托环治疗盆腔器官脱垂患者症状明显改善,满意率高。Jcmcta 2022;33 (1): 118-123
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Management of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture of Femur Biliary Ascariasis: Overall Perspective of Management Comparison of Disability Indices by Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire and Short Form 36 in Patients of Rheumatoid Arthritis With or Without Fibromyalgia Endoscopic Adenoidectomy with Microdebrider Versus Conventional Adenoidectomy Clinical Profile of RT-PCR Positive Paediatric Patients with COVID 19: Overview from Chattogram, Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1