{"title":"Predicting Academic Success from Academic Motivation and Learning Approaches in Classroom Teaching Students.","authors":"B. Çetin","doi":"10.19030/CIER.V8I3.9316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 Our aim was to determine whether learning approaches and academic motivation together predict academic success of classroom teaching students. The sample of the study included 536 students (386 female, 150 male) studying at the Classroom Teaching Division of Canakkale 18 Mart University. Our research was designed as a prediction study. Data was collected by using “The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire” developed by Biggs, Kember, and Leung (2001) and adapted to Turkish by Yilmaz (2009), “The Academic Motivation Scale” developed by Vallerand et al. (1992) and adapted to Turkish byEymur and Geban (2011), and “The Personal Information Form”. It was found that there is not a relationship between academic success and learning approaches. There was no significant correlation between academic success and academic motivation. Academic motivation and learning approaches were correlated (r=.258). Academic motivation and learning approaches, together, explained academic success (.078).","PeriodicalId":91062,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.)","volume":"141 1","pages":"171-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/CIER.V8I3.9316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Abstract
1 Our aim was to determine whether learning approaches and academic motivation together predict academic success of classroom teaching students. The sample of the study included 536 students (386 female, 150 male) studying at the Classroom Teaching Division of Canakkale 18 Mart University. Our research was designed as a prediction study. Data was collected by using “The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire” developed by Biggs, Kember, and Leung (2001) and adapted to Turkish by Yilmaz (2009), “The Academic Motivation Scale” developed by Vallerand et al. (1992) and adapted to Turkish byEymur and Geban (2011), and “The Personal Information Form”. It was found that there is not a relationship between academic success and learning approaches. There was no significant correlation between academic success and academic motivation. Academic motivation and learning approaches were correlated (r=.258). Academic motivation and learning approaches, together, explained academic success (.078).
我们的目的是确定学习方法和学习动机是否能共同预测课堂教学学生的学业成功。本研究的样本包括在Canakkale 18 Mart大学课堂教学部学习的536名学生(女386名,男150名)。我们的研究被设计成一项预测研究。数据收集方法包括Biggs, Kember, and Leung (2001) (Yilmaz(2009))(土耳其语)、Vallerand等人(1992)(yeymur和Geban(2011))(土耳其语)、“个人信息表”(The Personal Information Form)(修订的双因素研究过程问卷)。研究发现,学业成功和学习方法之间没有关系。学业成功与学业动机之间无显著相关。学习动机与学习方法相关(r= 0.258)。学习动机和学习方法共同解释了学业成功(0.078)。