Just Paying Lip Service? Public Trust and Public Support for Armed Forces in Germany

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Armed Forces & Society Pub Date : 2022-02-05 DOI:10.1177/0095327X211043917
H. Biehl
{"title":"Just Paying Lip Service? Public Trust and Public Support for Armed Forces in Germany","authors":"H. Biehl","doi":"10.1177/0095327X211043917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents an empirical analysis of whether, how, and why people are active to either support or protest against the Bundeswehr. Public opinion polls consistently report high levels of trust in the military. According to the social-psychological approach of participation theory, this trust should lead to corresponding actions. However, the literature on civil–military gaps claims that the majority of people pay mere lip service to soldiers rather than actively support the armed forces. No active support despite high levels of trust? In an effort to empirically test the level and the determinants of the public’s support for and protest against the military, an activity scale was included in a representative opinion poll in Germany. The analyses show that a fairly large part of the German population engages in activities that support the Bundeswehr and that public trust in the military predicts that supportive behavior. Importantly, trust in the armed forces remains a strong predictor of citizens’ activities related to the armed forces even when controlling for numerous other factors. Taken together, these findings contradict the widely shared view of a civil–military gap and instead provide empirical evidence for the social-psychological approach of participation theory.","PeriodicalId":47332,"journal":{"name":"Armed Forces & Society","volume":"56 1","pages":"395 - 418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Armed Forces & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X211043917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents an empirical analysis of whether, how, and why people are active to either support or protest against the Bundeswehr. Public opinion polls consistently report high levels of trust in the military. According to the social-psychological approach of participation theory, this trust should lead to corresponding actions. However, the literature on civil–military gaps claims that the majority of people pay mere lip service to soldiers rather than actively support the armed forces. No active support despite high levels of trust? In an effort to empirically test the level and the determinants of the public’s support for and protest against the military, an activity scale was included in a representative opinion poll in Germany. The analyses show that a fairly large part of the German population engages in activities that support the Bundeswehr and that public trust in the military predicts that supportive behavior. Importantly, trust in the armed forces remains a strong predictor of citizens’ activities related to the armed forces even when controlling for numerous other factors. Taken together, these findings contradict the widely shared view of a civil–military gap and instead provide empirical evidence for the social-psychological approach of participation theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
只是说说而已?德国公众对武装部队的信任和支持
本文对人们是否、如何以及为什么积极支持或抗议联邦国防军进行了实证分析。民意调查一直显示民众对军队的信任度很高。根据参与理论的社会心理学方法,这种信任应该导致相应的行动。然而,关于军民差距的文献声称,大多数人对士兵只是口头上的支持,而不是积极支持武装部队。尽管高度信任却没有积极的支持?为了从经验上检验公众对军队的支持和抗议的水平和决定因素,在德国进行了一次有代表性的民意调查,其中包括一项活动量表。分析表明,相当大一部分德国人参与支持联邦国防军的活动,公众对军队的信任预示着这种支持行为。重要的是,即使在控制了许多其他因素的情况下,对武装部队的信任仍然是公民与武装部队相关活动的有力预测指标。综上所述,这些发现与广泛认同的军民差距观点相矛盾,反而为参与理论的社会心理学方法提供了经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Armed Forces & Society: an interdisciplinary journal publishing articles on military institutions, civil-military relations, arms control and peacemaking, and conflict management. The journal is international in scope with a focus on historical, comparative, and interdisciplinary discourse. The editors and contributors include political scientists, sociologists, historians, psychologists, scholars, and economists, as well as specialists in military organization and strategy, arms control, and peacekeeping.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Teaching and Learning the West Point Way Do the Best and Brightest West Point Officers Stay in or Leave the Army? Book Review: Thanks for your service: The causes and consequences of public confidence in the U.S. military Book Review: Military Sociology: A Guided Introduction Military-Connected Children With Special Health Care Needs and Their Families: A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1