Evaluation of Patient- and Parent-Rated Emotional Expression Using theExpression and Emotion Scale for Children (EESC) in an ObservationalStudy of ADHD in Children and Adolescents

A. Schacht, A. Bürger, P. Wehmeier, M. Huss
{"title":"Evaluation of Patient- and Parent-Rated Emotional Expression Using theExpression and Emotion Scale for Children (EESC) in an ObservationalStudy of ADHD in Children and Adolescents","authors":"A. Schacht, A. Bürger, P. Wehmeier, M. Huss","doi":"10.2174/1874354401206010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The assessment of emotional expression in patients with ADHD can differ between parent/caregiver and child. Therefore, a new patient-rated version of the Expression and Emotion Scale for Children (EESC) was created and psychometrically analysed. Methods: This is a 6-month follow-up data analysis of a multicenter, prospective, 12-month observational study in children and adolescents with ADHD. Agreement between the two EESC versions (patient- and parent-rated), internal consistency, sensitivity for changes, floor and ceiling effects as well as test-retest variability were evaluated. The relationship between both EESC scores and the physician-rated ADHD-rating scale (ADHD-RS), Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S), and General Impression of Percieved Difficulties (GIPD) were also calculated. Results: 504 patients (mean age 9.6 years) were included and treated with non-stimulant medication (n=252) or stimulant medication (n=247); 5 patients received both medications. The EESC scores decreased similarly for patients and parents and in parallel over time by about 15 points, with the patient EESC scores being always about 3-4 points less than the parent-rated score. Both satisfaction scores increased in parallel by 2-3 points. The agreement and the correlation between the two EESC versions were in a modest range of approximately 0.5 to 0.6 and stable over time. The item-total correlations and analysis of Cronbach's Alpha showed mostly good support of the different items for the total scores, except items 19 and 24 (r 0.48). Correlations between the EESC score and other ADHD scales (ADHD-RS, CGI-S) were small to moderate for both ratings. The correlation between the GIPD and the EESC within raters was constant over time (r� 0.5). Conclusion: This analysis showed that both EESC versions have sound psychometrical properties and can be used in routine settings.","PeriodicalId":88755,"journal":{"name":"The open psychiatry journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open psychiatry journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874354401206010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The assessment of emotional expression in patients with ADHD can differ between parent/caregiver and child. Therefore, a new patient-rated version of the Expression and Emotion Scale for Children (EESC) was created and psychometrically analysed. Methods: This is a 6-month follow-up data analysis of a multicenter, prospective, 12-month observational study in children and adolescents with ADHD. Agreement between the two EESC versions (patient- and parent-rated), internal consistency, sensitivity for changes, floor and ceiling effects as well as test-retest variability were evaluated. The relationship between both EESC scores and the physician-rated ADHD-rating scale (ADHD-RS), Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S), and General Impression of Percieved Difficulties (GIPD) were also calculated. Results: 504 patients (mean age 9.6 years) were included and treated with non-stimulant medication (n=252) or stimulant medication (n=247); 5 patients received both medications. The EESC scores decreased similarly for patients and parents and in parallel over time by about 15 points, with the patient EESC scores being always about 3-4 points less than the parent-rated score. Both satisfaction scores increased in parallel by 2-3 points. The agreement and the correlation between the two EESC versions were in a modest range of approximately 0.5 to 0.6 and stable over time. The item-total correlations and analysis of Cronbach's Alpha showed mostly good support of the different items for the total scores, except items 19 and 24 (r 0.48). Correlations between the EESC score and other ADHD scales (ADHD-RS, CGI-S) were small to moderate for both ratings. The correlation between the GIPD and the EESC within raters was constant over time (r� 0.5). Conclusion: This analysis showed that both EESC versions have sound psychometrical properties and can be used in routine settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿童和青少年ADHD的观察性研究中,使用儿童情绪表达量表(EESC)评估患者和家长评定的情绪表达
背景:ADHD患者情绪表达的评估在父母/照顾者和儿童之间可能存在差异。因此,一个新的病人评价版本的表达和情绪量表的儿童(EESC)被创建和心理计量学分析。方法:这是一项针对儿童和青少年多动症的多中心、前瞻性、12个月观察性研究的6个月随访数据分析。评估两个EESC版本(患者评分和家长评分)之间的一致性、内部一致性、对变化的敏感性、下限和上限效应以及重测变异性。计算EESC评分与医生评定的adhd评定量表(ADHD-RS)、临床严重程度总体印象(CGI-S)和感知困难总体印象(GIPD)之间的关系。结果:504例患者(平均年龄9.6岁)接受非兴奋剂药物治疗(n=252)或兴奋剂药物治疗(n=247);5例患者同时接受两种药物治疗。随着时间的推移,患者和家长的EESC分数下降相似,并平行下降约15分,患者的EESC分数总是比家长评定的分数低约3-4分。这两项满意度都同步提高了2-3分。两个EESC版本之间的一致性和相关性在大约0.5到0.6的适度范围内,并且随着时间的推移保持稳定。项目-总分相关和Cronbach's Alpha分析显示,除第19项和第24项外,其他项目对总分的支持度均较好(r = 0.48)。EESC评分与其他ADHD量表(ADHD- rs, CGI-S)之间的相关性在两个评分中均为小到中等。评分者的GIPD和EESC之间的相关性随着时间的推移是恒定的(r - 0.5)。结论:本分析显示两种EESC版本具有良好的心理测量特性,可用于常规设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Structural and Functional Neuroimaging Findings in Delusional Disorder: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications Association Between Anxiety Level of Child with Parental and PatientFactors During Preoperative Anesthesia Visit Patterns of Psychiatric Morbidity Before and After a War in Lebanon at Twelve Months Following Cessation of Hostilities Medical Professionalism in the U.S.: Under Vigorous Challenge by International medical graduate committee of gap Mind-Body Parallelism Revisited
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1