"Can we study episodic-like memory in preschoolers from an animal foraging model": Correction.

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition Pub Date : 2022-05-19 DOI:10.1037/xan0000324
J. Vila, E. Strempler-Rubio, Angélica Alvarado
{"title":"\"Can we study episodic-like memory in preschoolers from an animal foraging model\": Correction.","authors":"J. Vila, E. Strempler-Rubio, Angélica Alvarado","doi":"10.1037/xan0000324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reports an error in \"Can we study episodic-like memory in preschoolers from an animal foraging model\" by Javier Vila, Eneida Strempler-Rubio and Angélica Alvarado (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 2021[Jul], Vol 47[3], 357-363). In the original article, a repeated measure analysis of variance was calculated with incorrect numerator and denominator degrees of freedom, which resulted in incorrect F, MSE, and R² values being reported in the Results section. When calculated correctly, the significant differences found in the new analysis of variance were the same as before. The results and conclusions are unchanged. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2021-92066-011). Episodic-like memory (ELM) involves remembering the what, where, and when (WWW) of an event as a whole, and it can be studied behaviorally. In research regarding this type of memory with children, one experiment proposes a new task adapted from animal foraging studies. A task derived from a foraging model was presented its considers the characteristics required for ELM study in children and employs a single trial presented from an egocentric perspective to avoid memory consolidation. One study compared four-year-old children's choices after being trained with one or three trials using a hide-and-seek task. The consequence size and retention interval between training and test were manipulated. Results showed that children chose the optimal outcome after an immediate or delayed test. The children's choices were conditional on the size of the consequences and the time at retrieval according to the Temporal Weighting Rule (Devenport & Devenport, 1994). The results were similar to those of animal studies and were consistent with a foraging memory model. In discussion, the advantages and limitations of the proposed task for the study of ELM in children are described and explained. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":54259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reports an error in "Can we study episodic-like memory in preschoolers from an animal foraging model" by Javier Vila, Eneida Strempler-Rubio and Angélica Alvarado (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 2021[Jul], Vol 47[3], 357-363). In the original article, a repeated measure analysis of variance was calculated with incorrect numerator and denominator degrees of freedom, which resulted in incorrect F, MSE, and R² values being reported in the Results section. When calculated correctly, the significant differences found in the new analysis of variance were the same as before. The results and conclusions are unchanged. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2021-92066-011). Episodic-like memory (ELM) involves remembering the what, where, and when (WWW) of an event as a whole, and it can be studied behaviorally. In research regarding this type of memory with children, one experiment proposes a new task adapted from animal foraging studies. A task derived from a foraging model was presented its considers the characteristics required for ELM study in children and employs a single trial presented from an egocentric perspective to avoid memory consolidation. One study compared four-year-old children's choices after being trained with one or three trials using a hide-and-seek task. The consequence size and retention interval between training and test were manipulated. Results showed that children chose the optimal outcome after an immediate or delayed test. The children's choices were conditional on the size of the consequences and the time at retrieval according to the Temporal Weighting Rule (Devenport & Devenport, 1994). The results were similar to those of animal studies and were consistent with a foraging memory model. In discussion, the advantages and limitations of the proposed task for the study of ELM in children are described and explained. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们能否从动物觅食模型中研究学龄前儿童的情景记忆”:修正。
报告了Javier Vila, Eneida strepler - rubio和angaccumica Alvarado在“我们可以从动物觅食模型中研究学龄前儿童的情景记忆”中的错误(实验心理学杂志:动物学习和认知,2021年[7],Vol 47[3], 357-363)。在最初的文章中,使用不正确的分子和分母自由度计算了重复测量方差分析,导致结果部分报告的F、MSE和R²值不正确。当计算正确时,在新的方差分析中发现的显著差异与以前相同。结果和结论不变。本文的在线版本已被更正。(原文摘要见记录2021-92066-011)类情景记忆(ELM)包括将事件的内容、地点和时间作为一个整体来记忆,它可以从行为上进行研究。在关于儿童这类记忆的研究中,一个实验提出了一个新的任务,这个任务改编自动物觅食研究。提出了一个从觅食模型衍生出来的任务,它考虑了儿童ELM研究所需的特征,并采用了从自我中心的角度提出的单一试验,以避免记忆巩固。一项研究比较了四岁儿童在接受过一次或三次捉迷藏任务训练后的选择。结果大小和训练与测试之间的保留间隔被操纵。结果表明,儿童在立即或延迟测试后选择了最佳结果。根据时间加权规则,孩子们的选择取决于结果的大小和检索的时间(Devenport & Devenport, 1994)。研究结果与动物实验相似,与觅食记忆模型一致。在讨论中,对儿童ELM研究提出的任务的优点和局限性进行了描述和解释。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition Psychology-Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition publishes experimental and theoretical studies concerning all aspects of animal behavior processes.
期刊最新文献
Impact of equivalence class training on same/different learning by pigeons. Test performance in optional shift and configural acquired equivalence are positively correlated. Contextual modulation of human associative learning following novelty-facilitated extinction, counterconditioning, and conventional extinction. Both probability and rate of reinforcement can affect the acquisition and maintenance of conditioned responses. Dual-system free-operant avoidance: Extension of a theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1