Return to work journey: an injured worker perspective

P. Odgers
{"title":"Return to work journey: an injured worker perspective","authors":"P. Odgers","doi":"10.1017/IDM.2014.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Returning to work following a workplace injury or illness is a complex, multi-faceted and continuously evolving issue that involves a range of challenges and complexities. Very little, however, is known about the stages individual injured worker's progress through, from their personal perspective, in returning to work. Objectives: The objectives of this research were to provide Comcare with greater insights and a better understanding about how to positively engage with injured/unwell workers in the federal jurisdiction, and to encourage more positive return to work (RTW) and recovery outcomes. Methods: A total of 47 in-depth interviews were conducted with injured workers from both premium paying and self-insured organisations in four Australian States and Territories. An independent research company conducted the interviews on behalf of Comcare between December 2012 and February 2013. A purposeful sampling approach was employed, however, this was influenced by the willingness of people to participate. Principle Findings:- Six stages were identified in the RTW journey, with each stage representing a distinct dynamic. The mind-set and needs of an individual were found to shift through each of these stages, thereby influencing the likelihood of them achieving a successful RTW outcome. Discussion: The RTW experience of injured and unwell workers was found to be a very personal journey that encompasses a range of experiences which can be completed in a few weeks, or continue for years. It is very emotionally charged, challenging, and tends to result in changes to personal and professional identity, life and work expectations. Conclusion: The insights gained by Comcare into an individual's RTW journey have reaffirmed our commitment to having the injured/unwell worker at the centre of what we do, and to continuing to tailor our claims management strategies to meet their individual needs. le: Key factors influencing an organisation's approach to return to work.","PeriodicalId":53532,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disability Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disability Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/IDM.2014.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Returning to work following a workplace injury or illness is a complex, multi-faceted and continuously evolving issue that involves a range of challenges and complexities. Very little, however, is known about the stages individual injured worker's progress through, from their personal perspective, in returning to work. Objectives: The objectives of this research were to provide Comcare with greater insights and a better understanding about how to positively engage with injured/unwell workers in the federal jurisdiction, and to encourage more positive return to work (RTW) and recovery outcomes. Methods: A total of 47 in-depth interviews were conducted with injured workers from both premium paying and self-insured organisations in four Australian States and Territories. An independent research company conducted the interviews on behalf of Comcare between December 2012 and February 2013. A purposeful sampling approach was employed, however, this was influenced by the willingness of people to participate. Principle Findings:- Six stages were identified in the RTW journey, with each stage representing a distinct dynamic. The mind-set and needs of an individual were found to shift through each of these stages, thereby influencing the likelihood of them achieving a successful RTW outcome. Discussion: The RTW experience of injured and unwell workers was found to be a very personal journey that encompasses a range of experiences which can be completed in a few weeks, or continue for years. It is very emotionally charged, challenging, and tends to result in changes to personal and professional identity, life and work expectations. Conclusion: The insights gained by Comcare into an individual's RTW journey have reaffirmed our commitment to having the injured/unwell worker at the centre of what we do, and to continuing to tailor our claims management strategies to meet their individual needs. le: Key factors influencing an organisation's approach to return to work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复工之旅:一个受伤工人的视角
背景:工作场所受伤或生病后重返工作岗位是一个复杂的、多方面的、不断发展的问题,涉及一系列挑战和复杂性。然而,从受伤工人个人的角度来看,他们重返工作岗位所经历的阶段却鲜为人知。目的:本研究的目的是为Comcare提供更深入的见解,更好地了解如何积极参与联邦管辖范围内的受伤/不适工人,并鼓励更多积极的重返工作岗位(RTW)和康复结果。方法:对澳大利亚四个州和地区的保费支付和自我保险组织的受伤工人进行了总共47次深入访谈。一家独立研究公司在2012年12月至2013年2月期间代表Comcare进行了访谈。采用了有目的的抽样方法,然而,这受到人们参与意愿的影响。主要发现:-在环球旅行中确定了六个阶段,每个阶段代表一个独特的动态。研究发现,个人的心态和需求在每个阶段都会发生变化,从而影响他们实现成功的RTW结果的可能性。讨论:受伤和身体不适的工人的环球旅行经历被发现是一个非常个人的旅程,包括一系列的经历,可以在几周内完成,也可以持续数年。这是非常情绪化的,具有挑战性的,往往会导致个人和职业身份,生活和工作期望的变化。结论:Comcare对个人RTW旅程的洞察再次肯定了我们的承诺,即以受伤/身体不适的工人为中心,并继续调整我们的索赔管理策略,以满足他们的个人需求。le:影响组织重返工作岗位的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Disability Management
International Journal of Disability Management Social Sciences-Health (social science)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Voraussetzungen für eine erfolgreiche Implementierung Vorteile eines gelingenden DisAbility-Managements Interrelated Factors for Return to Work of Sick-Listed Employees in Sweden Disclosing a Diagnosis in the Workplace: Perspective of People With Multiple Sclerosis Mögliche Widerstände
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1